Trump’s classified Mar-a-Lago docs 'should concern every American' - Hillary Clinton - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Trump’s classified Mar-a-Lago docs ‘should concern every American’ – Hillary Clinton

Published

on

Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton expressed her concern over the classified documents seized at former President Donald Trump‘s Mar-a-Lago estate last month, sharing a warning that “every American” should be concerned.

On Wednesday, the former secretary of state joined “The View” alongside daughter Chelsea Clinton to share about their new docuseries, “Gutsy” on Apple TV+ premiering on Friday. Before delving into their new show, which highlights some of America’s biggest heroines, they weighed in on one of the nation’s hottest topics: the FBI’s search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home and the documents found at the residence.

The FBI executed a search warrant for Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home on August 8. According to the inventory list unsealed Friday by a federal judge, agents gathered more than 11,000 documents or photographs without classification markings that were described as property of the U.S. government.

Hundreds of the documents retrieved during the search were considered confidential, secret and top-secret documents, as well as more than 40 empty folders with either “CLASSIFIED” banners on them or labeled “Return to Staff Secretary/Military Aide.”

ABC News previously reported that the FBI remains concerned about classified records that could still be missing even after their search of Mar-a-Lago.

On “The View,” Hillary Clinton said the seized documents from Mar-a-Lago “should be taken really seriously.”

READ ALSO:

“It should concern every American, because those documents and the empty folders as they were marked suggest that there was really important secret information that is essential to our country’s defense and security,” she said.

Clinton went on to explain how classified documents were securely shared with her during her time as secretary of state under former President Barack Obama from 2009 to 2013.

“A military courier would come into my office. It would be an emergency. There wouldn’t be time to get to the White House and have an emergency meeting in a SCIF,” she explained. “Usually a man — it was always a man, I remember — walked in, he would have a briefcase locked to his wrist.” A SCIF is a U.S. government–approved secure facility where sensitive information can be looked over by government officials.

“He would come into my office and he would say, ‘You have to look at this immediately, secretary.’ He would unlock the briefcase; he would stand there; he would give me this document that had really delicate, secret information about something of importance,” she continued. “I would read it, then I would sign that I read it. It would go back into the locked box attached to his wrist and off he would go.”

With that knowledge, Clinton was left puzzled as to how sensitive documents could be moved at all. “I don’t understand how [Trump] was permitted to take them, even to the residence, let alone to a country club in Florida,” she said.

Clinton went on to say that the country doesn’t have a clear understanding of what was in the seized documents, but reminded viewers on the daytime talk show that “people literally die to get our government information. They go to prison. They get exiled.”

“The idea that this would have been done, I hope everybody takes really seriously,” she added.

On Monday, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon granted a request from Trump’s legal team to appoint a special master to review documents seized in the FBI’s Mar-a-Lago search. The judge’s order halts all reviews of the documents by the Justice Department in its criminal investigation.

MORE: No, the FBI’s Trump investigation is not just like the Hillary Clinton email probe. Here’s why

When co-host Joy Behar asked Clinton if Trump should be indicted over the documents found in his Mar-a-Lago estate, she said that she didn’t want to “prejudge.”

“I have been prejudged wrongly enough. I’m not going to judge somebody else, and so I think the key is what the facts and the evidence are, what the FBI and the intelligence community learn about these documents, how they ended up there, who else saw them,” Clinton responded.

She went on to explain how the public should have “two minds” about the investigation. “No one is above the law, and the rule of law in a democracy … has to be our standard.”

The public “should not rush to judgment,” Clinton continued, but “we should be concerned about it, and we should follow the facts and the evidence.”

Chelsea Clinton also weighed in on South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham claiming political violence would break out if Trump were to be indicted over mishandling of presidential records.

“I’m very worried about our country,” she said. “Sen. Graham and others … should know better and should be more responsible with their platforms.”

“After the white nationalist insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, we know that there are people who believe that violence is an acceptable tool, even in our democracy, even in the 21st century in the United States of America,” she continued.

“I’m very concerned and I’m very disappointed in the senator,” Chelsea Clinton said. “I hope that others do not follow his lead.”

ABC News

International

Trump Orders US Navy to Blockade Strait of Hormuz After Iran Talks Collapse

Published

on

US President Donald Trump

Trump Orders US Navy to Blockade Strait of Hormuz After Iran Talks Collapse

Donald Trump has ordered the United States Navy to begin an immediate blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, escalating tensions with Iran after the collapse of critical peace talks in Islamabad.

The directive, announced Sunday via Truth Social, signals a major shift from diplomacy to military pressure in one of the world’s most sensitive geopolitical flashpoints. Trump said U.S. naval forces would intercept all vessels attempting to enter or leave the Strait of Hormuz, particularly those suspected of paying transit tolls to Iran, which he described as “extortion.”

The move follows the breakdown of high-level negotiations between Washington and Tehran, widely seen as a rare attempt to de-escalate tensions. Although Trump acknowledged that discussions were partly productive, he insisted that the core issue—Iran’s nuclear programme—remained unresolved.

Sources familiar with the talks revealed that the مذاکرات collapsed over Iran’s refusal to give up its enriched uranium stockpile and its insistence on maintaining control over shipping activities in the strategic waterway. The Iranian delegation, led by Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf, blamed the United States for failing to build trust during the negotiations.

The Strait of Hormuz blockade carries enormous global implications. The narrow waterway handles roughly 20% of global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments, making it one of the most critical energy chokepoints in the world. Any disruption threatens to send shockwaves through global markets.

READ ALSO:

Indeed, oil prices have already surged amid the crisis, with Brent crude and WTI climbing above $115 per barrel at peak levels. Analysts warn that the blockade could push prices even higher, worsening inflation and straining economies heavily dependent on energy imports.

The escalation comes just a day after the U.S. military intensified operations in the region. The United States Central Command confirmed that American forces had begun mine-clearing operations in the Strait of Hormuz, amid allegations that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps deployed naval mines to restrict shipping.

Two U.S. Navy destroyers, USS Frank E. Peterson and USS Michael Murphy, were spotted transiting the strait as part of efforts to secure maritime routes and ensure safe passage for commercial vessels.

Trump framed the blockade as a defence of global shipping freedom, warning that any Iranian attack on U.S. or allied vessels would be met with overwhelming force. However, the Pentagon has yet to release full operational details, leaving uncertainty around how the blockade will be enforced.

The situation is further complicated by developments involving Israel. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently signalled that Israeli military operations against Iran are ongoing, despite ceasefire discussions. He stressed that Israel would act independently to protect its national interests.

Experts warn that the U.S.-Iran conflict escalation could rapidly spiral into direct military confrontation, with far-reaching consequences for global security. Shipping companies have already begun rerouting vessels, while insurers are raising premiums due to heightened risks in the Gulf.

As of now, Iranian authorities have not issued an official response to the blockade order. Meanwhile, global markets are bracing for volatility as trading resumes, with investors closely monitoring developments in the region.

The unfolding crisis highlights the fragile state of U.S.-Iran relations and underscores the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz to global energy supply and economic stability.

Trump Orders US Navy to Blockade Strait of Hormuz After Iran Talks Collapse

Continue Reading

International

Elon Musk Slams South Africa Over Starlink Ban, Calls Policy ‘Racist’

Published

on

𝗘𝗹𝗼𝗻 𝗠𝘂𝘀𝗸
𝗘𝗹𝗼𝗻 𝗠𝘂𝘀𝗸

Elon Musk Slams South Africa Over Starlink Ban, Calls Policy ‘Racist’

Elon Musk has escalated his criticism of South Africa, accusing the government of racial discrimination following the continued refusal to grant an operating licence to his satellite internet service, Starlink.

In a strongly worded post on X (formerly Twitter) on Sunday, the SpaceX founder claimed that Starlink’s application had been blocked because he is not Black, despite being born in South Africa. The billionaire further alleged that the company was informally offered a workaround involving the appointment of a Black executive to satisfy ownership requirements, a move he said he rejected on principle.

The controversy centres on South Africa’s Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) policy, which requires companies operating in sectors like telecommunications to meet equity thresholds, typically mandating at least 30 percent Black ownership. The policy was introduced to correct deep economic imbalances created during apartheid, but it has increasingly become a point of friction for foreign investors.

South African regulators, including the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa, have consistently maintained that the rules apply uniformly to all operators and are a legal requirement for licensing. Authorities have pushed back against claims of discrimination, insisting that the policy is aimed at economic redress rather than racial exclusion.

READ ALSO:

Musk has repeatedly criticised the framework, describing it as “unashamedly racist” and claiming that such policies contradict the legacy of Nelson Mandela. He has also alleged that numerous laws in the country unfairly disadvantage non-Black citizens, further fuelling the ongoing debate.

Despite the standoff, Starlink has continued its rapid expansion across Africa, now operating in nearly two dozen countries where it provides high-speed internet access to underserved communities, including schools and healthcare centres. South Africa, however, remains one of the few major economies on the continent where the service is unavailable.

Musk had previously proposed initiatives to support connectivity in rural South African communities, including offers to provide internet access to thousands of schools, but those plans have stalled due to regulatory hurdles tied to ownership compliance.

As of now, the South African government has not issued an official response to Musk’s latest remarks. However, previous statements suggest that there is unlikely to be any regulatory concession without full adherence to B-BBEE requirements.

The dispute highlights a broader tension between South Africa’s post-apartheid transformation policies and the expectations of global technology investors. Analysts say the outcome could shape future investment decisions and influence how African nations balance economic redress with the need to attract international business.

Elon Musk Slams South Africa Over Starlink Ban, Calls Policy ‘Racist’

Continue Reading

International

Machete-Wielding Man Shot Dead After Injuring Three in New York

Published

on

Machete-Wielding Man Shot Dead After Injuring Three in New York

Machete-Wielding Man Shot Dead After Injuring Three in New York

A machete-wielding man who allegedly identified himself as “Lucifer” was shot dead by police after attacking three people at a subway station in New York City on Saturday, in a violent incident that triggered panic across the transit system and led to temporary train disruptions.

The suspect, identified as 44-year-old Anthony Griffin, reportedly launched the attack inside the subway network in Queens before being confronted by responding officers. Authorities said the incident began at the 7 train platform, where commuters were suddenly attacked in a series of violent slashes.

Police reported that the first victim, an 84-year-old man, was struck on the head. Griffin then allegedly moved through the station and attacked a 65-year-old man, causing injuries to his head and face, before proceeding to another platform where a 70-year-old woman was cut on the shoulder.

The attacks caused chaos inside the station, with passengers fleeing as the suspect moved between platforms, continuing the rampage before officers arrived at the scene.

READ ALSO:

According to the New York City Police Department, officers quickly located the suspect and issued repeated commands for him to drop the weapon. Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch said Griffin ignored at least 20 instructions to disarm and instead advanced toward officers while holding the machete and behaving erratically.

Officials said the suspect repeatedly claimed he was “Lucifer” during the confrontation, heightening concerns about his mental state as the situation escalated rapidly.

Police said an officer opened fire when Griffin advanced toward them with the weapon still raised. He was struck twice and later pronounced dead at Bellevue Hospital.

All three victims were also taken to hospital for treatment. Authorities confirmed their conditions were stable following the attack, though they sustained significant injuries.

Officials further revealed that Griffin had previously been arrested three times, although he had no documented history indicating classification as an emotionally disturbed person under police records. Investigators are now reviewing CCTV footage and eyewitness accounts to determine the full sequence of events.

The attack caused temporary disruptions across subway services as emergency responders secured the area and evacuated passengers from affected platforms. Train operations were later restored after the scene was brought under control.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul condemned the incident, describing it as a “senseless act of violence,” while city officials praised the rapid response of police officers in preventing further harm. Authorities say investigations are ongoing as they assess security measures across the city’s transit network following the attack.

Machete-Wielding Man Shot Dead After Injuring Three in New York

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending