Education
Trump Expands Efforts to Revoke Citizenship of Some Foreign-Born Americans
Trump Expands Efforts to Revoke Citizenship of Some Foreign-Born Americans
The administration of United States President Donald Trump has intensified efforts to strip citizenship from some naturalised Americans, launching fresh denaturalisation cases against individuals accused of fraud, terrorism-related activities, war crimes and other serious offences.
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) confirmed that new proceedings have been filed against about a dozen foreign-born US citizens accused of concealing critical information during their immigration and naturalisation processes or engaging in criminal activities that could have disqualified them from obtaining citizenship.
Among the most prominent cases is that of Debashis Ghosh, an Indian-origin businessman accused of orchestrating an investment fraud scheme valued at approximately $2.5 million.
According to court filings, Ghosh allegedly defrauded investors both before and after obtaining US citizenship by misleading them about the management and location of investment funds.
Federal authorities alleged that he intentionally concealed aspects of the scheme during his naturalisation process and continued the fraudulent operation after becoming a US citizen.
The latest actions are part of a broader immigration enforcement strategy by the Trump administration, which has increasingly focused on denaturalisation as a tool for addressing alleged immigration fraud and national security concerns.
US officials said the new cases were filed through collaboration between the Department of Justice’s Office of Immigration Litigation, the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and federal prosecutors across multiple states.
Authorities stated that some of the individuals targeted in the latest crackdown are accused of terrorism-related offences, firearms trafficking, financial crimes and even war crimes.
Under US law, denaturalisation is the legal process through which citizenship obtained through naturalisation can be revoked if the government proves that the person intentionally concealed material facts or committed fraud during the citizenship process.
READ ALSO:
- Israel Jails Soldiers Over Virgin Mary Statue Desecration in Lebanon
- Frank Edoho Breaks Silence on Collapse of Second Marriage
- Repentant Terrorists Swear Quran Oath Before Reintegration — Borno Govt
Legal experts note that denaturalisation remains relatively uncommon because US citizenship enjoys strong constitutional protections.
However, federal courts may revoke citizenship in cases involving deliberate deception, false identity claims, undisclosed criminal conduct or affiliations with terrorist or extremist organisations.
Statistics released by immigration authorities show that between 1990 and 2017, the United States filed slightly more than 300 denaturalisation cases — averaging about 11 cases annually — making the recent increase under the Trump administration particularly significant.
The renewed push follows years of stricter immigration policies introduced during Trump’s presidency, including expanded vetting procedures, tougher asylum policies and intensified reviews of old immigration records for possible fraud.
The Department of Justice has previously argued that citizenship obtained through deception undermines the integrity of the US immigration system and should be revoked when evidence supports such action.
Critics, however, warn that aggressive denaturalisation efforts could create widespread anxiety among immigrant communities and naturalised citizens who fear increased government scrutiny.
Civil liberties organisations and immigration advocacy groups have repeatedly argued that expanding citizenship revocation policies risks undermining confidence in the immigration system and may discourage eligible immigrants from applying for US citizenship.
Legal scholars have also raised concerns that broad denaturalisation campaigns could disproportionately affect minority and immigrant populations, particularly individuals from developing countries.
Although the current list of defendants does not specifically target any nationality, the inclusion of an Indian-origin businessman has attracted significant attention within South Asian communities in the United States.
Many immigrant advocacy groups believe the development signals a broader immigration enforcement approach rather than a nationality-specific crackdown.
Immigration lawyers also noted that denaturalisation cases can have severe consequences beyond the loss of citizenship, including possible criminal prosecution, detention and eventual deportation if courts rule against the accused individuals.
The Justice Department has not disclosed how many of the ongoing cases could ultimately lead to deportation proceedings or additional criminal charges.
Meanwhile, supporters of the administration’s immigration policies argue that enforcing denaturalisation laws is necessary to preserve the credibility of the US citizenship process and ensure that citizenship is not granted through fraud or deception.
The renewed enforcement push is expected to further fuel political debate over immigration, citizenship rights and national security as the United States moves deeper into another heated election season.
Trump Expands Efforts to Revoke Citizenship of Some Foreign-Born Americans
![]()
Education
JAMB to Allow Candidates Use Personal Computers for UTME from 2027
JAMB to Allow Candidates Use Personal Computers for UTME from 2027
The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) has announced plans to introduce a “Bring Your Own Device” (BYOD) option for the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) beginning from 2027 as part of efforts to improve examination efficiency and reduce technical problems experienced at Computer-Based Test (CBT) centres.
The Registrar of JAMB, Prof. Ishaq Oloyede, disclosed this on Monday during the 2026 Policy Meeting on Admissions into Tertiary Institutions held in Abuja.
According to Oloyede, candidates will be allowed to use their personal laptops or computers for the examination under a controlled system designed to preserve the integrity and security of the UTME process.
He explained that a specially configured flash drive and other security mechanisms would be deployed to restrict unauthorised access, prevent malpractice and ensure candidates cannot tamper with the examination platform during the test.
“Candidates would be allowed to use their personal devices for the examination, but a flash drive would be inserted to prevent malpractice,” Oloyede stated.
The JAMB registrar said the initiative was introduced to make the examination process more convenient, reliable and cost-effective for both candidates and the examination body.
According to him, the move would also address frequent complaints by candidates about malfunctioning computers and sudden system shutdowns at CBT centres during examinations.
READ ALSO:
- Lagos to Launch State Driver’s License, Expand Rail Network
- ASUU Threatens Fresh Showdown with FG Over Alleged Breach of 2025 Agreement
- Tinubu’s Policies End Era of State Bailouts, Boost FX Reserves to $49.4bn – Uzodimma
Oloyede noted that many candidates perform better on devices they are already familiar with, adding that the BYOD option would reduce anxiety associated with using unfamiliar systems during the high-stakes examination.
He further explained that the board was developing additional technological safeguards ahead of the 2027 rollout to ensure that the system meets global examination standards and remains resistant to cyber threats or examination fraud.
The planned reform forms part of JAMB’s broader digital transformation strategy aimed at improving the credibility, efficiency and transparency of Nigeria’s tertiary admission process.
In recent years, JAMB has introduced stricter examination monitoring systems including biometric verification, IP address tracking, candidate login restrictions and real-time surveillance at accredited CBT centres to curb examination malpractice.
The registrar also disclosed that the board had continued to sanction CBT centres found guilty of violating examination guidelines, while several centres were delisted during the 2026 UTME exercise over technical and ethical breaches.
During the same policy meeting, JAMB announced top performers in the 2026 UTME examination.
According to Oloyede, John Ayuba Enwere emerged as the overall best candidate with a score of 372.
Enwere, who sat for the examination in Lagos State, selected Nile University as his first-choice institution and intends to study Computer Science.
Ayomide Bamisile from Ondo State emerged as the third-best candidate with a score of 369 and chose the Federal University of Technology, Akure (FUTA) as his preferred institution to study Software Engineering.
JAMB also used the meeting to discuss admission benchmarks, institutional capacities and reforms aimed at improving fairness and transparency in the admission process across Nigerian tertiary institutions.
The UTME remains Nigeria’s primary entrance examination for admission into universities, polytechnics and colleges of education, with over two million candidates sitting for the examination annually.
JAMB to Allow Candidates Use Personal Computers for UTME from 2027
![]()
Education
ASUU Threatens Fresh Showdown with FG Over Alleged Breach of 2025 Agreement
ASUU Threatens Fresh Showdown with FG Over Alleged Breach of 2025 Agreement
The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has threatened a fresh confrontation with the Federal Government over what it described as the flawed and selective implementation of the December 2025 agreement reached after years of negotiations aimed at stabilising Nigeria’s university system.
The warning followed the union’s National Executive Council (NEC) meeting held at Modibbo Adama University, Yola, Adamawa State, where ASUU leaders expressed frustration over what they called the government’s failure to fully implement critical aspects of the agreement signed with the union.
Reading the communiqué to journalists in Abuja on Monday, ASUU President, Prof. Christopher Piwuna, said the growing dissatisfaction among lecturers could trigger another round of industrial unrest across public universities if urgent steps are not taken.
According to him, the union had deliberately remained patient since the agreement was publicly unveiled in January 2026 to allow the Federal Government demonstrate commitment to implementation, but the process has remained slow and inconsistent.
“The increasing frustration occasioned by the seeming government’s disinterestedness in the welfare of Nigerian academics is brewing a pent-up anger which could erupt into a new wave of industrial unrest if not addressed,” Piwuna warned.
ASUU accused both Federal and State Governments of failing to faithfully implement several provisions of the agreement, particularly those relating to lecturers’ welfare, salary adjustments and university funding.
READ ALSO:
- Tinubu’s Policies End Era of State Bailouts, Boost FX Reserves to $49.4bn – Uzodimma
- Alleged Coup Trial: Cleric In Video Says He Warned Plotters Of Failure
- CBN Raises Alarm Over Rising Risks In Non-Interest Banking Sector
The union listed unresolved issues to include the withheld three-and-half months’ salaries from the 2022 strike period, promotion arrears, salary shortfalls linked to the Integrated Personnel and Payroll Information System (IPPIS), unremitted third-party deductions and outstanding arrears of the 25–35 per cent wage award approved for university workers.
ASUU also faulted the Federal Government for failing to inaugurate the Implementation Monitoring Committee (IMC), which was expected to oversee the execution of the agreement and prevent bureaucratic delays.
According to the union, the absence of the monitoring committee has created loopholes that allowed what it described as distorted and selective implementation of some aspects of the deal by university authorities and government agencies.
The December 2025 agreement between ASUU and the Federal Government was considered a major breakthrough after nearly 16 years of disputes surrounding the renegotiation of the 2009 FG-ASUU agreement.
The deal reportedly included a 40 per cent salary increase for academic staff, improved university funding, enhanced welfare packages, research support and measures to strengthen university autonomy and academic freedom.
Part of the agreement also covered the payment of outstanding salary arrears, revitalisation funds for public universities and protection for lecturers who participated in previous industrial actions.
However, ASUU said many of the promises made under the agreement have either been partially implemented or ignored entirely.
The union stressed that the worsening welfare conditions of lecturers and the poor state of public universities could further damage the education sector if government fails to act swiftly.
Piwuna appealed to Nigerians, parents and stakeholders in the education sector to prevail on both federal and state governments to fully implement the agreement in order to avoid another disruption of the academic calendar.
“Our union’s doors remain open for working with the government to realise all our demands,” he said.
“At the same time, NEC directs an emergency meeting of NEC to be called in the next few weeks to review the situation and take appropriate action as may be necessary.”
The latest threat has renewed concerns over the possibility of another nationwide university strike, barely months after the Federal Government assured Nigerians that the new agreement with ASUU would guarantee lasting industrial peace in the tertiary education sector.
ASUU Threatens Fresh Showdown with FG Over Alleged Breach of 2025 Agreement
![]()
Education
JAMB Pegs 2026 University Admission Cut-Off Mark at 150
JAMB Pegs 2026 University Admission Cut-Off Mark at 150
The Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board has fixed 150 as the minimum cut-off mark for admission into Nigerian universities for the 2026 academic session.
The decision was announced on Monday during the 2026 Policy Meeting on Admissions held in Abuja, where key stakeholders in the education sector gathered to deliberate on admission guidelines for tertiary institutions across the country.
The meeting was attended by the Minister of Education, Tunji Alausa, alongside representatives of universities, polytechnics, colleges of education, and other stakeholders.
![]()
-
metro2 days agoHuman Traffickers Remove Teenager’s Womb to Punish Her for Rejecting Sex Work
-
metro2 days agoRCCG Pastor Faces Rape, Oral Sex Allegation as Church Refuses Suspension
-
Education1 day agoHope, Fear as JAMB Releases Fresh Cut-Off Marks for Tertiary Institutions
-
Education1 day agoUTME No Longer Compulsory for Colleges of Education Admissions
-
Politics2 days agoRivers 2027: Why Fubara Missed APC Screening — Yilwatda
-
Politics2 days agoLagos 2027: Hamzat Gains Massive Backing as APC Battles Over Running Mate
-
Politics2 days agoFubara Walks Out of APC Screening, Declines to Speak With Journalists
-
Education1 day agoFG Introduces Mandatory Drug Tests for Secondary School Students Nationwide
