International
US signals support for possible ICC sanctions over Israel warrants
US signals support for possible ICC sanctions over Israel warrants
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has suggested he will work with lawmakers on potential sanctions against the International Criminal Court as its prosecutor seeks arrest warrants for senior Israeli officials.
Mr Blinken told a congressional hearing he was “committed” to taking action against the “profoundly wrong-headed decision”.
His comments come amid a Republican push to impose sanctions on ICC officials, which may see a vote as soon as this week.
The United States is not a member of the court but has backed previous prosecutions, including the ICC’s arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin over the war in Ukraine.
At a Tuesday hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, James Risch, its top Republican, asked whether Mr Blinken would support legislation to address the ICC “sticking its nose in the business of countries that have an independent, legitimate, democratic judicial system”.
“We want to work with you on a bipartisan basis to find an appropriate response. I’m committed to doing that,” the secretary of state said.
Mr Blinken said “there’s no question we have to look at the appropriate steps to take to deal with, again, what is a profoundly wrong-headed decision”.
The ICC’s chief prosecutor Karim Khan announced on Monday that he had applied for arrest warrants against Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Yoav Gallant.
READ ALSO:
- Why 600,000 Kenyans stopped using mobile money in 2023 – Statistics bureau
- Police rescue kidnapped women, child in Kwara
- Ekiti teacher jailed 15 years for raping minor
Mr Khan is also seeking arrest warrants for three Hamas officials – Yahya Sinwar, its leader in Gaza, Mohammed Deif, the commander of its Qassam Brigades military wing, and Ismail Haniyeh, the head of its political bureau.
US President Joe Biden said on Monday it was “outrageous” to apply for arrest warrants. There was “no equivalence – none – between Israel and Hamas”, he added.
Mr Blinken’s remarks echoed the broader pushback in Washington over the court’s decision.
At least two measures imposing sanctions on the ICC had already been introduced in Congress as the court ramped up its inquiry into Israel’s handling of the war in Gaza.
Support on Capitol Hill appears to be coalescing around a bill launched earlier this month by Texas Republican Chip Roy.
The Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act would target ICC officials involved with the case by blocking their entry to the US, revoking any current US visas they hold, and prohibiting them from any property transactions within the country – unless the court ceases its cases against “protected persons of the United States and its allies”.
At least 37 lawmakers in the Republican-led House are now co-sponsoring the legislation, including Elise Stefanik, the chamber’s third highest-ranking Republican.
Ms Stefanik is fresh off a visit to Israel, where she met with Mr Netanyahu, spoke at the Knesset and met with the families of hostages trapped in Gaza.
The court “equivocates a peaceful nation protecting its right to exist with radical terror groups that commit genocide”, she told the BBC in a statement.
Andy Barr of Kentucky, another Republican supporting the bill, said further pursuit of the ICC’s case against Israel must “be met with the full force of our sanctions”.
Less clear, however, is whether Democratic lawmakers will get behind the effort.
The party’s moderate and liberal wings have grappled with Mr Biden’s Israel policy for months, as young progressive voters have pushed the president to more sharply criticise the Netanyahu government’s operations in Gaza.
READ ALSO:
- Russian forces simulate nuclear drills near Ukraine
- Shettima emphasizes implementation of Tinubu’s 8-point agenda at APC policy roundtable
- Woman arrested in Gombe for abuse of naira notes
Ohio’s Greg Landsman, one of a few Democrats who voted last week to reverse Mr Biden’s pause on a weapons shipment to Israel, told the BBC he hopes Congress will issue a bipartisan rebuke of the ICC “to send the strongest message possible”.
“The decision [to seek arrest warrants] will only further inflame tensions and divisions, embolden anti-Israel conspiracies, and ultimately, it will undermine the credibility of the ICC,” he said in a statement.
Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson urged Chuck Schumer, the Senate’s top Democrat, to sign a letter on Tuesday inviting Mr Netanyahu to address a joint meeting of Congress.
In March, Mr Schumer called for new elections in Israel but he described the ICC’s case on Monday as “reprehensible”.
Sen Chris Coons, a Democrat from Delaware and member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told the BBC that he was unsure about moves to sanction ICC officials.
“I’m not there yet imposing sanctions on the ICC, as opposed to looking to see whether the off ramp of a ruling by the judges of the ICC that they’re not going to proceed with warrants is something I think may come in the next couple of days,” the Democrat said.
But Mr Coons added that he is discussing taking action with his committee colleagues from both parties.
But some left-wing Democrats have expressed their support for the ICC’s actions.
Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar said the court’s allegations are “significant” and the US must support its work as it has done on past occasions, including in the case of Libya.
“The application for arrest warrants is merely the beginning of a judicial process,” she wrote in a statement on Monday.
“The ICC has been a functioning court – it has seen convictions, acquittals, and dismissals, as we would expect from an impartial and non-political judicial body.”
It remains unclear whether any sanction efforts have yet gathered the support needed to advance through either the Republican-led House or the Democrat-controlled Senate.
White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters Tuesday that administration officials were discussing “next steps” with lawmakers.
Watching from across the world in Russia, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters that its adversary’s “attitude and willingness to use sanctions methods even against the ICC” was “more than curious”.
US signals support for possible ICC sanctions over Israel warrants
![]()
International
UK Navy Sailor Charged Over Alleged Plot to Leak Intelligence to Russia
UK Navy Sailor Charged Over Alleged Plot to Leak Intelligence to Russia
A 24-year-old British Royal Navy sailor has been charged with national security offences over an alleged plot to obtain sensitive military intelligence and pass protected information to Russia, raising fresh concerns about the security of classified defence information.
The suspect, Teddy Young, appeared before Westminster Magistrates’ Court in London on Thursday, October 8, where the allegations against him were outlined.
According to British authorities, Young faces two charges under the National Security Act 2023 relating to the alleged retention of protected information and preparations to disclose sensitive material for the benefit of a foreign power.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) alleged that Young accessed and retained sensitive United Kingdom defence and intelligence information while serving as a Royal Navy warfare intelligence rating with high-level security clearance and access to intelligence systems.
Prosecutors said the alleged offences occurred between November 2024 and May 2025, during his first deployment, which began on November 4, 2024.
The allegations include obtaining, copying, recording or retaining protected information with the intention of benefiting a foreign power, as well as engaging in conduct in preparation for disclosing the material.
READ ALSO:
- How Parents Raised Millions to Free 20 Abducted NYSC Members
- Lasaco Assurance Retains A(NG) Rating as Revenue Rises 35.2% to N30.8bn
- Man Allegedly Caught Using Old Tyres to Scam POS Operator
Although the charges identify an unnamed foreign power, British media reports have identified Russia as the country Young allegedly sought to assist.
Investigators reportedly suspect that Young used the dark web to explore ways of contacting Russian authorities. He is also alleged to have drafted a message in Russian intended to establish contact with a potential recipient of the sensitive information.
Reports further alleged that he copied information to a private email account, in breach of Navy rules.
Young joined the Royal Navy in April 2024 and was serving in a warfare intelligence role when the alleged offences took place.
He was first arrested on May 21, 2025, and subsequently released on bail while investigations continued. His security clearance was suspended, and he was removed from his duties.
Counterterrorism police arrested him again at his home in Bedfordshire on Tuesday, October 6, 2026, before charging him with the offences.
During Thursday’s brief court hearing, Young was not asked to enter a plea because the seriousness of the charges meant the case could not be dealt with at the magistrates’ court.
District Judge Annabel Pilling ordered that he remain in custody pending his next appearance at the Central Criminal Court, commonly known as the Old Bailey, on October 16.
The Royal Navy confirmed that a serving member had been charged following an investigation by Counter Terrorism Policing London.
The Navy declined to comment further, citing the ongoing legal proceedings.
British authorities also stressed that the investigation was separate from a recent security incident involving suspicious vehicles near RAF Fairford, a military airbase in Gloucestershire.
The case comes amid continuing concerns among Western governments about espionage, the protection of sensitive military information and attempts by foreign powers to obtain intelligence relating to national security.
However, the allegations against Young remain unproven, and any determination of his criminal responsibility will be made through the judicial process.
UK Navy Sailor Charged Over Alleged Plot to Leak Intelligence to Russia
![]()
International
Russian Bomb Kills 33 in Ukraine, Hits Two Passenger Buses
Russian Bomb Kills 33 in Ukraine, Hits Two Passenger Buses
At least 33 people have been killed and 18 others injured after a Russian guided bomb struck a road in Kramatorsk, eastern Ukraine, hitting two passenger buses in one of the deadliest attacks on civilians reported in the country this year.
The attack occurred at about 10am in the Donetsk region, where two scheduled buses were operating when the Russian munition struck the road.
The blast triggered fires in the buses and surrounding area, leaving passengers and other civilians dead or injured. Emergency workers were deployed to the scene to extinguish the fires, recover victims and evacuate the wounded.
The death toll rose from an initial figure of 12 as rescuers continued their search of the area.
Preliminary investigations indicated that the weapon may have been a UMPB D-30SN guided aerial bomb, although authorities said investigations were continuing to establish the exact type of munition used.
Images from the scene showed a badly burned bus, debris scattered across the road and bodies lying near the site of the explosion.
Donetsk Governor Vadym Filashkin accused Russian forces of deliberately targeting civilians, while Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy condemned the attack and described the location as a bus stop.
READ ALSO:
- How Six Members of a Family Were Murdered in Oyo
- World Bank Raises Nigeria Growth Forecast, Demands More Jobs, Poverty Reduction
- Flood Submerges Enugu Road, Strands School Children, Passengers
Russia has not immediately commented on the attack or the reported casualty figures. Moscow has consistently denied deliberately targeting civilians during its war against Ukraine.
Authorities suspended public transportation in Kramatorsk and neighbouring Sloviansk following the attack as a precaution against further strikes.
Kramatorsk, an important Ukrainian-controlled city in the Donetsk region, has faced repeated Russian drone and guided-bomb attacks as fighting intensifies along the eastern front.
The latest attack came a day after another deadly Russian strike on Pryluky, in Ukraine’s Chernihiv region, where a missile hit a five-storey residential building.
The death toll in Pryluky rose to 22 people, including five children, while 54 others were injured. Several people were rescued from the damaged building as emergency crews continued search-and-rescue operations.
The attacks came amid an intensified Russian aerial campaign involving missiles, drones and guided bombs against Ukrainian cities and infrastructure.
Ukrainian authorities have appealed for stronger air-defence support from international partners as the country faces renewed attacks ahead of winter.
The latest strikes have also renewed concerns over the safety of civilians and critical infrastructure nearly five years after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Russian Bomb Kills 33 in Ukraine, Hits Two Passenger Buses
![]()
International
US Proposes $70,000 OPT Fee for Nigerians, Other Foreign Students
US Proposes $70,000 OPT Fee for Nigerians, Other Foreign Students
The administration of US President Donald Trump has proposed a $70,000 fee for international students seeking to participate in a programme that allows them to work in the United States after completing their studies.
The proposed rule by the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) targets the Optional Practical Training (OPT) programme available to eligible foreign students on F-1 visas, including Nigerians studying in the US.
Under the proposal, US educational institutions would be required to pay $70,000 for each student’s initial OPT participation, while an additional $30,000 fee would apply for each renewal or further training.
The proposal does not initially require students themselves to pay the $70,000 directly. Instead, the financial obligation would fall on the schools recommending students for OPT, although education groups warn that the cost could ultimately affect students and universities.
The OPT programme allows eligible international students to obtain temporary work experience in jobs related to their fields of study. Most students can participate for up to one year after graduation, while graduates in qualifying science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields can receive an additional two years.
READ ALSO:
- EFCC Re-Arraigns Two Over Alleged £110,000 Money Laundering, ₦500m Fraud
- Three Killed, 36 Injured as Houthi Attacks Hit Saudi Airports
- Bandits Kill Three in Fresh Attack on Kebbi Community
DHS said the proposed fees are intended to combat fraud, strengthen the integrity of the immigration system and protect US workers.
The department has also argued that OPT has been misused as a source of cheap foreign labour and that the proposed fees would encourage universities to exercise greater scrutiny when recommending students for the programme.
The proposed charge represents a sharp increase from the current cost associated with OPT applications, which is around $500.
The plan could have significant implications for international students from countries such as Nigeria, India and China, whose graduates make substantial use of OPT, particularly in technology and other specialised fields.
American universities and business groups have raised concerns that the proposed fee could discourage international students from studying in the US and make it harder for companies to recruit skilled graduates.
Education groups have also warned that the measure could affect American universities that rely on international enrolment for tuition revenue and employers that depend on foreign graduates to fill specialised positions.
The proposal is part of the Trump administration’s broader effort to tighten US immigration policies and impose greater restrictions on foreign students and workers.
The DHS proposal is subject to a public comment period before it can be finalised. If approved, the rule would take effect after an additional implementation period, while legal challenges are also expected.
The proposed OPT fee is separate from other changes to the H-1B visa programme, which has also faced increased costs and restrictions under the Trump administration.
US Proposes $70,000 OPT Fee for Nigerians, Other Foreign Students
![]()
-
metro1 day ago[UPDATED] 20 NYSC Prospective Corps Members Freed After Seven Days in Captivity
-
metro3 days agoSupreme Council For Sharia Secretary-General Nafiu Baba-Ahmed Dies
-
metro3 days agoUCH CMD: After Decades Without Muslim, Agunbiade Demands Fair Chance
-
News3 days agoIwo Son Becomes Yorubaland’s First Muslim Professor of Arabic Without Secondary School
-
Politics2 days ago‘No Decent Wages, No Credible Elections’ — Sowore Threatens 2027 Boycott
-
Politics3 days agoTompolo’s PBAT Movement Suspends Campaign Over Ondo Military Crash
-
metro2 days agoSeven Years With Parkinson’s: Man Seeks N65m for Brain Surgery in Türkiye
-
Politics2 days ago2027: Obi Makes U-Turn, Vows to Restore Fuel Subsidy If Elected
