Stopping fuel importation will create monopoly, sustain fuel crisis  - Marketers - Newstrends
Connect with us

Business

Stopping fuel importation will create monopoly, sustain fuel crisis  – Marketers

Published

on

Court restrains NMDPRA from shutting down Dangote Refinery over regulatory dispute

Stopping fuel importation will create monopoly, sustain fuel crisis  – Marketers

Three major oil marketers in the country, yesterday, asked the Federal High Court in Abuja to stop what they described as plot by Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals FZE, to monopolise the energy sector of the economy.

The marketers, including AYM Shafa Limited, A. A. Rano Limited and Matrix Petroleum Services Limited, maintained that allowing Dangote Refinery to takeover the oil sector would spell doom for the country.

However, efforts made to reach the Group Head, Communications, Dangote Group, Mr. Anthony Chiejina, last night, were unsucces-sful as several calls made to his known mobile phone were unanswered, while text and WhatsApp messages were not also responded to at press time.
The companies took the position in a reply they filed to challenge the competence of the suit Dangote’s firm filed to nullify licenses they secured to import refined petroleum products into the country.

The marketers were cited as defendants in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1324/2024, which also has the Nigeria Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority, NMDPRA, and the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation Limited, NNPC, as defendants.

It will be recalled that Dangote Refinery had, in its suit, queried the propriety of licences issued to other key oil marketers to bring refined petroleum products into the country when it has not recorded any shortfall in its own operations.

According to the plaintiff, NMDPRA acted in breach of Sections 317(8) and (9) of the Petroleum Industry Act, PIA, by issuing licenses for the importation of petroleum products to the defendants.

READ ALSO:

The plaintiff told the court that the licences were issued to the defendants, “despite the production of AGO and Jet-A1 that exceeds the current daily consumption of petroleum products in Nigeria by Dangote Refinery.”

It, therefore, prayed the court to award N100billion in damages against the NMDPRA for allegedly continuing to issue import licenses to NNPCL and the other defendants for the import of petroleum products, such as Automotive Gas Oil, AGO, and jet fuel (aviation turbine fuel) into Nigeria.

Specifically, Dangote Refinery, among other things, applied for an order of injunction, restraining the 1st defendant (NMDPRA) from further issuing and/or renewing import licenses to the 2nd to 7th defendants or other companies for the purpose of importing petroleum products.

It further sought an order of court directing the 1st defendant to seal off all tank farms, storage facilities, warehouses, and stations used by the defendants for the storage of all refined petroleum products imported into Nigeria.

“An order of mandatory injunction directing the 1st defendant to withdraw immediately all import licenses issued to the 2nd-7th defendants and other companies other than the plaintiff and other local refineries for the purpose of importing refined petroleum products into Nigeria.

“An order of injunction restraining the 1st defendant from imposing and demanding a 0.5% levy meant for off-takers of petroleum products directly and an additional 0.5% wholesale levy in favour of MDGIF or any other levy or sum against the plaintiff.”

However, in their reply to the suit, dated November 5, 2024, the three marketers told the court that the plaintiff does not produce adequate petroleum products for the daily consumption of Nigerians, saying there was nothing before the court to prove the contrary.

The defendants told the court that they were well qualified and entitled to be issued a licence by the 1st defendant to import petroleum products into the country within the provisions of Section 317(9) of the PIA.

They argued that vesting the plaintiff with the power of monopoly in Nigeria’s petroleum industry, as it was seeking through the legal action, would kill competitive pricing of petroleum products in the country, further deteriorate Nigeria’s critically ailing economy “and unleash untold hardship on Nigerians, all of which constitute a recipe for disaster in the polity.

“That if Nigeria puts all her energy eggs in one basket by stopping importation of petroleum products and allowing the Plaintiff to be the sole producer and supplier of petroleum products in Nigeria, with liberty to determine the prices at which it supplies the products, the prices of petroleum products in Nigeria will continue to rise and energy security will elude Nigeria.

“That in the event of any breakdown in or obstruction to the production chain of the plaintiff which stops it from producing, Nigeria will be thrown into energy crises as Nigeria does not have the reserves that would last it for the at least 30 days that it would need to order, pay for, freight and import refined products into tanks in Nigeria.

“That amid the glaring absence of any credible and demonstrable proof that the Plaintiff refines and supplies adequate petroleum products for the daily use/consumption of Nigerians, giving the plaintiff judicial imprimatur to be the sole supplier of refined petroleum products to Nigerians, thereby encouraging monopoly in a major aspect of Nigeria’s oil industry, is a recipe for disaster in Nigeria’s energy sector,” the defendants added.

They insisted that granting the reliefs sought by the plaintiff, which is aimed at making it a monopolist in Nigeria’s petroleum sector, would leave Nigeria and Nigerians at the mercy of the olaintiff, with respect to availability and cost of purchasing petroleum products in the country.
More so, the defendants told the court that they were fully qualified for the import licences issued to them by the 1st Defendant, as they duly met all the legal requirements.

“The import licences lawfully and validly issued to the defendants did not in any way whatsoever, cripple the Plaintiff’s business or its refinery.

“The import licences issued to the defendants by the 1st defendant are in line with the provisions of Petroleum Industry Act, 2021, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2018 and other relevant laws,” the defendants averred.

Justice Inyang Ekwo had earlier adjourned the matter till January 20, 2025, to enable the parties explore an out-of-court settlement of the dispute, even as the plaintiff expressed its readiness to withdraw the suit.

 

Stopping fuel importation will create monopoly, sustain fuel crisis  – Marketers

Loading

Business

NCAA Moves Against Airlines Over Rising Flight Delays

Published

on

NCAA Moves Against Airlines Over Rising Flight Delays

Thousands of Nigerian air passengers faced delays in August as domestic airlines struggled to keep to their scheduled flight times.

Now, the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) says it is taking regulatory steps that could lead to sanctions against airlines responsible for persistent delays.

The regulator’s August data showed that 4,765 of 7,961 scheduled domestic flights were delayed. In other words, nearly 60 per cent of the flights did not leave as scheduled.

Air Peace and United Nigeria Airlines recorded some of the highest delay rates, with 71 per cent and 76 per cent of their flights respectively affected.

NCAA Warns Airlines

NCAA Director of Public Affairs and Consumer Protection, Michael Achimugu, said that the regulator had already engaged some of the airlines involved.

According to him, the NCAA met with Air Peace, United Nigeria Airlines and Max Air and issued stern warnings over their operations.

The authority is now weighing further regulatory measures as the problem continues to affect passengers.

Achimugu also urged travellers to consider other airlines when repeated delays make a particular carrier unreliable.

When one airline is continuously misbehaving, buy tickets on another airline and make your flight” he said.

READ ALSO:

Passenger Rights Put Enforcement Under Spotlight

However, aviation consultant Capt. John Ojikutu believes the recurring problem exposes a wider weakness in the sector.

Ojikutu said Nigeria has regulations intended to protect air travellers, but questioned how consistently those rules are enforced.

The regulation is there to protect the customer. What is the enforcement?” he said.

He noted that passengers can report violations to the appropriate authorities. But, in his view, regulators must follow up on those complaints with meaningful action.

The aviation expert also recalled experiencing severe delays himself.

He said he once travelled to Abuja and passengers had to board an aircraft three times before another plane was brought in to complete the journey.

The disruption, he said, left him returning to Lagos considerably later than expected.

Are Airlines Planning Their Routes Properly?

Ojikutu also linked the industry’s problems to the way some airlines plan their operations.

He questioned the number of carriers competing on the Lagos-Abuja route, particularly when several airlines operate multiple flights each day.

His argument is that airlines should first establish the level of passenger demand before selecting routes, aircraft sizes and flight frequencies.

According to him, deploying aircraft capable of carrying more than 100 passengers without sufficient demand can put additional financial pressure on an airline.

He therefore advised carriers to consider routes with enough passengers but less competition.

Smaller Aircraft Could Serve Regional Routes

Ojikutu said the industry could also learn from the operational model used by the former Nigerian Airways.

He recalled that the airline used larger aircraft on major routes while smaller planes connected regional destinations to major airports.

He suggested that modern carriers could adopt a similar approach by connecting cities such as Sokoto, Kaduna, Jos and Minna to larger aviation hubs.

Rather than having every airline compete directly on major routes, he said carriers could develop regional networks that feed passengers into bigger airports.

He also called for more airlines to establish bases outside Lagos.

According to him, encouraging operations in other parts of the country could reduce the heavy concentration of airlines in Lagos and create stronger regional connections.

Concern Over Airline Survival

Ojikutu further questioned the short lifespan of many Nigerian airlines.

He attributed part of the problem to weak business planning and argued that airlines should present credible, sustainable plans before receiving regulatory approval to operate.

The latest development therefore puts both airlines and the aviation regulator under scrutiny, as passengers continue to deal with delays despite existing rules designed to protect them.

NCAA Moves Against Airlines Over Rising Flight Delays

Loading

Continue Reading

Business

Fuel Prices Climb to ₦1,500 per Litre Across Nigeria, Sparking Calls for Urgent Action

Published

on

Fuel Prices Climb to ₦1,500 per Litre Across Nigeria, Sparking Calls for Urgent Action

Workers’ unions and fuel sellers appeal to the government to protect families from soaring transportation and food costs.

Fuel stations across Nigeria have raised the price of petrol to as high as ₦1,500 per litre, creating fresh financial strain for working people, small business operators, and families. Across cities such as Kano, Maiduguri, Damaturu, and Sokoto, drivers and commercial riders now pay higher rates at the pump, while stations in central and southern communities also report steady increases.

Because transportation costs directly influence the price of everyday essentials, bus drivers and tricycle operators have raised passenger fares to cover their fuel bills. As a result, parents and commuters face steeper daily travel expenses and rising grocery bills.

READ ALSO:

To address this pressure, the Nigeria Labour Congress urged federal authorities to step in quickly with practical relief measures. These proposals include providing cost-of-living allowances to workers, ensuring local refineries can purchase crude oil directly in local currency, and using surplus oil earnings to keep pump prices affordable.

At the same time, fuel sellers warned that pump prices could rise even further if international oil markets remain volatile. Retail associations noted that recent wholesale adjustments from local refineries have increased costs for station owners, who must pay more to restock their tanks.

To keep fuel affordable for the general public, union leaders and station operators are encouraging the government to reduce shipping and regulatory fees, helping ensure that reliable energy remains accessible to every community across the country.

Fuel Prices Climb to ₦1,500 per Litre Across Nigeria, Sparking Calls for Urgent Action

Loading

Continue Reading

Business

Why Petrol Remains Expensive Despite Dangote Refinery’s Local Production

Published

on

Why Petrol Remains Expensive Despite Dangote Refinery’s Local Production

Why Petrol Remains Expensive Despite Dangote Refinery’s Local Production

Nigeria’s emergence as a major local refining hub has reduced the country’s dependence on imported petroleum products, but it has not insulated consumers from rising petrol prices, with the cost of crude oil, international market conditions, refinery economics and downstream distribution continuing to influence pump prices.

The development has renewed debate over why Nigerians are still paying relatively high prices for Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) despite the operation of the Dangote Petroleum Refinery, Africa’s largest refinery.

The refinery recently increased its petrol gantry price to N1,350 per litre, from N1,265, amid higher crude oil prices and rising replacement costs in the downstream market. The increase has subsequently put pressure on marketers and filling stations to adjust their pump prices.

Dangote Group President Aliko Dangote has explained that domestic refining does not automatically mean petrol will be priced independently of the international oil market because crude remains the principal raw material for refining.

The refinery therefore remains exposed to the cost of crude oil, whether the feedstock is sourced locally or imported.

This is particularly important because Nigerian crude is commercially linked to international benchmarks. As a result, producing petrol domestically removes some import-related costs but does not eliminate the underlying value of the crude used to manufacture the product.

Recent developments also show that the availability and cost of Nigerian crude oil remain central to the economics of the Dangote refinery.

The Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) reported that 53.7 million barrels of crude oil and condensate were supplied to local refineries between April and June 2026, representing 97.4 per cent performance under the Domestic Crude Supply Obligation (DCSO).

READ ALSO:

At the Dangote refinery, producers offered 68.1 million barrels against the facility’s requirement of 63 million barrels during the second quarter. The refinery eventually accepted 52.6 million barrels, equivalent to about 78 per cent of the volumes offered to it.

The figures indicate that the issue is not simply whether crude is available in Nigeria, but also the commercial terms, grades, logistics and timing involved in supplying it to the refinery.

Dangote has previously raised concerns about the cost and competitiveness of some domestic crude supplies. A portion of the refinery’s crude intake has at times been imported, while the company has continued seeking ways to secure sufficient Nigerian crude at competitive prices.

The refinery’s access to domestic crude has, however, improved considerably.

Dangote secured at least 16 million barrels of Nigerian crude for October delivery, equivalent to about 520,000 barrels per day and representing most of the refinery’s 700,000-barrel-per-day capacity.

The October supply includes allocations from the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) as well as additional crude purchased through tenders.

The refinery received an average of about 565,000 barrels per day of Nigerian crude in August, nearly twice its average intake in 2025.

The increased domestic supply could reduce the refinery’s exposure to imported crude, but it does not necessarily mean petrol prices will fall immediately.

The reason is that the cost of crude is only one component of the final price of petrol.

Other factors include refining costs, financing, storage, transportation, depot charges, distribution and retail margins. Exchange-rate movements can also affect costs linked to dollar-denominated purchases and other imported inputs.

The removal of the petrol subsidy has further changed Nigeria’s fuel-pricing structure. Rather than having the government absorb a large portion of the difference between market costs and the regulated pump price, consumers are now more directly exposed to changes in market conditions.

Consequently, movements in global crude prices can affect locally refined petrol just as they affect imported products.

The recent rise in the Dangote refinery’s petrol price demonstrates this relationship. The refinery’s latest adjustment reflected rising crude prices and increased replacement costs faced by refiners, importers and depot operators.

READ ALSO:

The relationship between global prices and domestic petrol prices has also worked in the opposite direction when crude prices declined.

Earlier in the year, the Dangote refinery reduced its petrol price as international crude prices eased, illustrating how changes in the global market can be transmitted to locally refined products.

The refinery is also increasingly becoming a participant in the international refined-products market rather than solely a supplier to Nigeria.

The facility generated $1.82 billion in net profit during the first half of 2026, on revenue of more than $13 billion, reversing a $476 million loss recorded in 2025.

The refinery has expanded exports of jet fuel, diesel and gasoil, with the company becoming a significant supplier to international markets during disruptions to global fuel supplies.

The development demonstrates the commercial reality of operating a large refinery: refined products can be sold into domestic or international markets depending on market conditions, prices and demand.

For Nigeria, the refinery nevertheless represents a major structural change in the downstream petroleum sector.

The country previously relied heavily on imported refined petrol despite being a major crude oil producer. Increased domestic refining means more crude can be converted into petroleum products within Nigeria, reducing dependence on imported finished products and potentially improving energy security.

The refinery is also expected to expand its capacity further, with plans to increase refining capacity to 1.4 million barrels per day over the next three years.

The larger capacity could increase domestic availability of refined products and strengthen Nigeria’s position as a regional supplier.

However, greater refining capacity by itself does not guarantee permanently cheaper petrol.

For consumers, the crucial issue is how efficiently the entire petroleum value chain operates—from crude production and supply to refining, transportation, storage and retail distribution.

The Domestic Crude Supply Obligation is intended to improve access to Nigerian crude for local refineries. Increased domestic crude production and stronger commercial arrangements between producers and refiners could further improve the reliability of supply.

There are also efforts to address logistics and supply challenges, including proposals for crude-swap arrangements designed to match domestic refiners with local producers and potentially reduce delivery times and logistical complications.

If such measures improve the reliability and competitiveness of domestic crude supply, they could strengthen the economics of local refining.

For now, however, Nigerians remain exposed to a combination of global crude oil prices, domestic crude supply costs, exchange-rate pressures and downstream distribution expenses.

This means that the biggest benefit of the Dangote refinery may not necessarily be an immediate collapse in petrol prices, but a reduction in Nigeria’s dependence on imported refined fuel, greater domestic refining capacity and the potential to retain more value from the petroleum chain within the country.

The immediate challenge remains translating those structural gains into greater petrol price stability and affordability for households, businesses and transport operators.

As Dangote increases its intake of Nigerian crude and moves towards higher utilisation, the cost and reliability of its feedstock will remain critical to the price of petrol in Nigeria.

The latest developments therefore suggest that local refining has changed Nigeria’s fuel supply landscape, but it has not disconnected petrol prices from the international oil market.

Why Petrol Remains Expensive Despite Dangote Refinery’s Local Production

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending