News
Controversy over timeframe as Presidential Tribunal commences pre-hearing session
Controversy over timeframe as Presidential Tribunal commences pre-hearing session
The Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT) will today commence pre-hearing session in the five petitions challenging the declaration of Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC), as the President- elect.
The Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, Mahmood Yakubu, had on March 1 declared Tinubu the president-elect on the grounds that his party scored the majority of votes cast in the polls.
Dissatisfied with the result, five political parties and their presidential candidates filed separate petitions seeking orders to annul the election and declared them as winners or alternatively an order directing the INEC to conduct a fresh election.
The petitioners are the opposition Peoples Democratic Party(PDP) and Atiku Abubakar, marked CA/PEPC/05/2023; the Labour Party (LP) and Peter Obi, marked: CA/PEPC/04/2023; the Action Alliance (AA) and its presidential candidate, Solomon Okangbuan; with No: CA/PEPC/01/2023; Allied Peoples Movement (APM) and its candidate, Chichi Ojei, with suit number: CA/PEPC/03/2023; and the Action Peoples Party (APP) in a petition with No CA/PEPC/02/2023.
READ ALSO:
- Presidential Tribunal: Why Obi will lose in court — Primate Ayodele
- Troops destroy notorious bandits’ leader camps, rescue kidnap victims in Zamfara
- Landlord remanded for beating female tenant
The tribunal has fixed the pre-hearing session after it has stopped receiving replies to the various petitions on April 23.
Technically, today’s proceedings are specifically to sort preliminary applications before proceeding with the substantive petitions.
Regardless of the date fixed for the hearing of the petitions, there are calls by some legal experts, political analysts, Civil Society Organizations, religious leaders and other stakeholders for the amendment of the electoral process in a manner that every election petition case would be dispensed with before swearing in the declared winner.
In Nigeria, election petitions are governed by specific electoral law making them unique in nature. Section 288 of the constitution and the Electoral Act 2022 regulate elections, while petitions are also governed by the 1999 Constitution and the Electoral Act.
The call is necessitated by the fact that some provisions of the 1999 constitution and the Electoral Act erect legal roadblocks and difficult for petitioners challenging the conduct and outcome of elections to sail through to victory at the tribunals.
One of such notorious provisions is section 285 (6) which provides that “An election tribunal shall deliver judgment in writing within 180 days from the date of filing of the petition.”
Those advocating for the amendment of the electoral process are of the view that the Section 285 (6) is inimical to achieving fair hearing enshrined in the same Constitution. To them, setting 21-day time frame within which to file a petition challenging the conduct of elections in Nigeria is ridiculous.
READ ALSO:
- 95-year-old man ‘marries 14 years old girl’ in Abuja community
- Tinubu, Peter Obi celebrates Osimhen for breaking Samuel Eto’o, George Weah records
- Gas explosion kills pastor, wife, housemaid in Delta
They noted that challenging the conduct or outcome of a presidential election implies challenging the election conducted in 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). According to the legal experts, law that gives the petitioner 21 days to gather his materials and articulate his grievances in a form that can be presented before the tribunal within 21 days is not progressive, considering the fact that the same 21-day deadline was also given to opposition candidates to file their petitions for other categories of election held in smaller geographical areas like state, district and constituency.
It is therefore their opinion that these requirements of the laws do not provide a fair and level playing grounds for the parties involved in election petitions as swearing in those declared winners pending the determination of the tribunal cases has often given the defendants undue advantage to use the state resources to fight their opponents at the tribunal.
Since the return of the fourth republic, presidential election results have always been rejected and contested at the tribunal with exception to the 2015 presidential election won by President Muhammadu Buhari.
In 1999, the election of former President Olusegun Obasanjo was challenged at the tribunal by Chief Olu Falae. In 2003, Obasanjo’s re-election was challenged by Muhammadu Buhari.
In 2007, both Muhammadu Buhari and Atiku Abubakar challenged the victory of late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua who won a highly controversial election. Buhari returned to the tribunal in 2011 when he challenged the election of President Goodluck Jonathan.
There was no challenge of Buhari’s victory in 2015 as the then incumbent President, Jonathan conceded defeat and congratulated the winner. However, in 2019, Atiku Abubakar challenged the re-election of President Muhammadu Buhari.
READ ALSO:
- Adamawa man beats wife to death over plans to dump him for another man
- Klopp hails “all-time great” Salah after Liverpool’s win over Brentford
- Diezani Alison-Madueke prays court to vacate bench warrant against her
It is interesting to know that historically, no presidential election tribunal has upturned the election of the declared winner. The closest was in 2007 when the Supreme Court in a split decision of 4- 3 upheld the election of late President Umaru Musa Yar’ Adua.
The point to be considered is that, in all of the above situations, the presidential candidates so declared as winners by the electoral body, all took their oath of office on May 29, while petitions against them were still pending at the tribunals.
Those advocating for the conclusion of election petitions before swearing in the declared winner are of the view that the fact that the constitution prescribed a time frame of about 180 days, doesn’t mean that it must run its course since the policy has been overheated.
However, in as much as it is true that justice delayed is justice denied, it is no less axiomatic that justice rushed is justice crushed.
Until and unless a major constitutional adjustment is carried out, to the effect that nobody must be sworn in as anything whether president or governor or lawmakers until the petition has been exhausted, the laws regulating the hearing and determination of election petitions remains sacrosanct.
Dayo Akinlaja (SAN) said it is not feasible to achieve because there are inbuilt procedures to ensure fair hearing and parties are given timelines for filing processes.
He explained that a party cannot be stampeded to file processes before the expiry of the timelines allowed under the law and each party may decide to hurry or speed up the process.
All parties are entitled to fair hearing and there is no way fair hearing would not be sacrificed where the procedure of adjudication is inordinately rushed.
READ ALSO:
- BREAKING: Tyre bursts into flames as plane crash lands at Abuja airport
- Lagos-Ibadan accident: FRSC advises motorists to use alternative routes
- Why we can’t send wide-body aircraft to Port Sudan – FG
To that extent, the agitation for the completion of election cases before May 29, 2023, cannot be effectuated within the prism or framework of the constitution and the Electoral Act, 2022, which provides for a decision or judgment to be delivered within 180 days of the filing of the petition against the return of a candidate in an election.
There are also the appeals arising therefrom to be completed within 60 days from the date of filing. To be achievable, both the Constitution and the Electoral Act will have to be amended to make such a provision.
In addition to the above, although the timeframe had been spelt out, parties still find ways to raise technical issues like failure to serve parties directly, failure to file within a certain time, failure to tender certain vital documents, objections and arguments over the admissibility of documents, lengthy cross-examination of witnesses etc.
Unfortunately, these are allowed by the (tribunal) courts which have stalled the process thus defeating the purpose of the legislative solutions or gains made.
Furthermore, all decisions must be within the law with judicial activism to restore confidence in the Nigerian election systems and to ensure no party is robbed as justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done.
In the future, it is possible to amend our laws and rules of court to accommodate such an idea, but it is clearly impossible under the nation’s present circumstances.
It is more arduous to prove an election petition than to defend it. That is why the petitioners need more time to prove their cases and not necessarily the defendants.
That is why the Petitioners are given 21 days to file and the defendants have 14 days to respond. And the Petitioners have a further 7 days to reply, making a total of 30 days as against the 14 days of the Respondents. It follows that in leading evidence in court/Tribunal in support of the petitions, the petitioners would also take more time.
Quote: “the agitation for the completion of election cases before May 29, 2023, cannot be effectuated within the prism or framework of the constitution and the Electoral Act, 2022, which provides for a decision or judgment to be delivered within 180 days of the filing of the petition against the return of a candidate in an election”
Controversy over timeframe as Presidential Tribunal commences pre-hearing session
SUN
![]()
News
BREAKING: Kidnapped Oyo Pupils, Teachers Regain Freedom After 55 Days + VIDEO
Kidnapped Oyo Pupils, Teachers Regain Freedom After 55 Days
– Eight Arrested, Several Neutralised
The pupils and teachers abducted from three schools in Oriire Local Government Area of Oyo State have regained their freedom after spending 55 days in captivity, the Presidency has confirmed. The release was announced on Friday evening by Bayo Onanuga, Special Adviser to President Bola Tinubu on Information and Strategy, in a post on his verified X handle: “Finally, all the kidnapped pupils and teachers in Orire, Oyo have been rescued by our security agencies”. The announcement brought relief to families who had endured nearly two months of agonising uncertainty, with communities across Oyo State celebrating the safe return of their loved ones.
A total of 46 people—comprising 39 pupils and seven teachers—were abducted when gunmen launched simultaneous attacks on Baptist Nursery and Primary School (Yawota) , Community High School (Ahoro-Esinele) , and L.A. Primary School (Ahoro-Esinele) on May 15, 2026. The Defence Headquarters later identified the abductors as dislodged members of Boko Haram, confirming that the terrorists had crossed into Oyo State from the North-East after being displaced by sustained military operations. The kidnapping triggered widespread concern and prompted the Nigeria Union of Teachers (NUT) to declare a statewide strike in Oyo, which was later suspended following assurances from the Oyo State Government on improved security measures.
READ ALSO:
- NRC Begins Major Operational Reset with Review of 150 Standard Procedures
- Two Arrested for Smoking on Air Peace Flight from South Africa – Police
- “I Just Learned I Filed for Divorce” – Nnamdi Kanu’s Wife Breaks Silence
In a follow-up post, Onanuga provided further details on the operation, stating that eight of the kidnappers were arrested and are now in DSS custody, while some others were neutralised during the rescue. He emphasised that “there was no quid pro quo in the rescue” and that the kingpin whose release the kidnappers had demanded remains under prosecution for his terrorist activities. The rescue followed months of coordinated operations involving security forces from the Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) , the State Security Service (SSS) , the Nigerian Army, and other security agencies, with sources familiar with the operation telling Premium Times that several terrorists were killed during the rescue mission.
The abduction triggered widespread concern, especially after one of the abducted teachers, Michael Oyedokun, was reportedly killed and his execution shown in a disturbing video released by the kidnappers. During the 55-day ordeal, security forces faced significant challenges, with Minister of Defence Christopher Musa revealing that the kidnappers had threatened to kill all the children if troops advanced on their hideout. The abductors were reportedly seeking the release of detained terrorist commanders, including Mahmud Usman (also known as Abu Bara’a or Abbas Mukhtar) and his deputy Abubakar Abba (also known as Isah Adam or Mahmud Al-Nigeri), both senior members of the Jama’atu Ansarul Muslimeena Fi Biladis Sudan (Ansaru) faction of Boko Haram.
Following their release, one of the rescued teachers expressed gratitude to President Bola Tinubu and security agencies in a video shared by the Presidency. The teacher praised the security operatives involved in the operation, saying: “Every security operative tried so much and that is why we are still alive now”. The Oyo State Government has previously denied claims of ransom payment, describing such reports as “false, misleading and a deliberate attempt to misinform the public”. As of the time of this report, full details of the rescue operation—including where the victims were found—remain unclear. Authorities are expected to provide further information in the coming hours as investigations continue into the circumstances surrounding the 55-day captivity ordeal.
One of the rescued teachers in Oyo sends a thank you message to President Tinubu and the security agencies. pic.twitter.com/bGeuhvWH7F
— Bayo Onanuga, OON, CON (@aonanuga1956) July 10, 2026
BREAKING: Kidnapped Oyo Pupils, Teachers Regain Freedom After 55 Days
![]()
News
INEC Disowns Fake CVR Portal, Warns Nigerians of Phishing Scam
INEC Disowns Fake CVR Portal, Warns Nigerians of Phishing Scam
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has disowned an online portal for the ongoing Continuous Voter Registration (CVR) exercise currently circulating on social media platforms, describing it as a phishing scam designed to harvest the personal data of unsuspecting citizens. The Commission’s Deputy Director of Information and Publicity, Wilfred Ifogah, issued the warning in an interview in Abuja on Thursday, urging Nigerians to exercise caution and ignore the fraudulent message. The viral post, titled “INEC ONLINE VOTERS REGISTRATION 2026 ONGOING,” has been widely shared on WhatsApp and other digital platforms. It directs users to the fraudulent website https://linksnapro.com/cvrreg, falsely claiming that the registration deadline is August 17, 2026. The post also falsely states that the home addresses provided by applicants would be used to deliver their Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs).
READ ALSO:
- Xenophobic Attacks: NANS Threatens Shutdown of MTN, MultiChoice, Stanbic IBTC
- Relief for Last-Mile Delivery Operators as TSS Motors launches Forland T5 light Trucks
- MURIC Demands Release of El-Rufai’s Personal Physician, Condemns ICPC Arrest
Ifogah advised members of the public to disregard the message and avoid clicking on the link, warning that doing so could expose users to identity theft and cyber fraud. He emphasised that INEC does not use third-party blogging links or private URLs for official exercises, nor does it deliver PVCs to private residences. The only official and approved INEC portal for all voter registration activities, including updates, transfers, PVC replacement, and registration centre location, remains https://cvr.inecnigeria.org. Ifogah urged citizens to verify all electoral information through INEC’s official website inecnigeria.org or its verified social media handles.
The warning comes as the Commission recently extended the nationwide CVR exercise by two weeks and introduced a self-service online registration option for eligible first-time voters. The exercise, which began on August 18, 2025, was originally scheduled to end on July 10, 2026, but will now close on Friday, July 24, 2026. The new self-service portal, launched on July 8, 2026, allows eligible citizens to initiate and complete their voter registration, including biometric capture, using their personal devices without visiting an INEC office. This development is part of INEC’s broader efforts to leverage technology to enhance voter participation and make the registration process more accessible to Nigerians across the country.
INEC Disowns Fake CVR Portal, Warns Nigerians of Phishing Scam
![]()
News
Soldiers Reject N100,000 Salary as Tinubu Holds Emergency Security Meeting
Soldiers Reject N100,000 Salary as Tinubu Holds Emergency Security Meeting
The Federal Government’s disclosure that the lowest-paid Nigerian soldier now earns N100,000 monthly has sparked criticism from serving and retired military personnel, who say the amount falls far short of addressing the country’s economic realities .
The backlash followed comments by the Minister of Defence, Christopher Musa, who said the government had doubled soldiers’ minimum salary from N49,000 to N100,000 as part of efforts to improve their welfare . The minister made the disclosure during an interview on News Central on Wednesday, ahead of its broadcast on the NC Exclusive programme on Friday . He also admitted, however, that defence funding remains inadequate, stating: “It’s not enough” .
Many personnel argued that the increase remains inadequate and urged President Bola Tinubu to fulfil his promise of a broader salary review announced earlier this year . On March 7, 2026, during an interfaith breaking of fast with Service Chiefs, the President had assured members of the Armed Forces that his administration would prioritise their welfare, accommodation and other benefits . Serving personnel who spoke on condition of anonymity pressed the government to implement the promised salary increase, warning that poor remuneration was contributing to declining morale and increasing cases of personnel going AWOL .
A retired soldier, Abdul Isiak, said the current salary could not sustain military personnel in the face of rising living costs. “It is not enough at all. What is N100,000 with the current situation of the country? It can’t get to anywhere. They should do better. If they pay more, they would put more effort into what they are doing” .
Another retired serviceman, Sergeant Zaki Williams, questioned whether the amount announced by the minister was actually being paid. “I doubt if they are paying up to that amount now. It is a lie,” he said . He also criticised the remuneration offered to soldiers: “Even at that, that money is too ridiculous. Any government paying a soldier N100,000 is not a serious one. If you know what they are passing through, you would not offer them such money. We have been crying but no help. The government has tried, but they can do better” .
The Coordinator of the Coalition for Concerned Veterans, Abiodun Herbert-Durowaye, described the salary as insufficient for personnel risking their lives to defend the country . “How can that be sufficient for someone who’s putting his life on the line for the country? We know the cost of living in this country today. That’s not sufficient for any man who is ensuring the peaceful coexistence of the country. It is far from it. My brother, how much is a bag of rice today? We are not talking about children’s school fees, shelter and what have you” .
READ ALSO:
- DJ Chicken Arrested Over Viral Video Threatening Seyi Tinubu
- Israel Warns US of ‘Specific’ Iranian Assassination Plot Against Trump
- Troops intercept foreign courier carrying drugs, alcohol to terrorists in Borno
Serving personnel who spoke anonymously urged the Federal Government to implement the salary increase President Tinubu announced in March, saying the promised review had yet to take effect . One officer said: “The Federal Government should immediately implement the new salary structure it promised members of the Armed Forces of Nigeria if it is serious about restoring morale and strengthening the nation’s military. Today, many personnel are living in conditions that do not reflect the enormous sacrifices they make in defence of the country” . Another personnel appealed directly to the President: “During Iftar, the President raised our hopes and we were very happy. He should please make it a reality so that everybody will be happy. Things are quite expensive, which has made our current salaries not enough. I personally need the increment as I speak. I have children and dependents to cater for” .
The controversy unfolded as President Tinubu on Thursday convened a high-level security meeting at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, with service chiefs, intelligence heads and senior security advisers to review the nation’s security situation . The closed-door meeting, which lasted more than two hours, brought together the nation’s top military commanders and security leadership .
Those present at the meeting included the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu; Minister of Defence, General Christopher Musa (retd.); Chief of Defence Staff, General Olufemi Oluyede; Chief of Army Staff, Lieutenant General Waidi Isa; Chief of Defence Intelligence, Lieutenant General Emmanuel Undiandeye; Director-General of the Department of State Services, Adeola Ajayi; Director-General of the National Intelligence Agency, Mohammed Mohammed; Special Adviser to the President on Homeland Security, Major General Adeyinka Famadewa (retd.); and Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu .
READ ALSO:
- Kogi Teacher’s Murder: Three Suspects Arrested, to Face Trial for Culpable Homicide
- Nigeria’s stock market surpasses South Korea as world’s top-performing equity market
- Tinubu vows not to betray Nigerians, says economic reforms will secure brighter future
The meeting focused on a comprehensive review of security challenges and developments across various theatres of operation . It came two days after troops of Operation FANSAN YAMMA, supported by the Air Component of the Joint Task Force, disrupted what the military described as a major planned terrorist offensive in Zamfara and Katsina States . During the July 7 operation, three Nigerian Air Force aircraft reportedly tracked a convoy of approximately 300 heavily armed terrorists on motorcycles and conducted precision airstrikes on the formation .
In a separate engagement, troops neutralised Alhaji Tukur, identified by military authorities as a notorious bandit commander and younger brother of wanted kingpin Alhaji Shehu Bagiwaye, in Dogon Kade . In the North-East, troops of Operation Hadin Kai have continued operations against ISWAP and other terrorist groups . Although details of the deliberations were not made public, officials familiar with the meeting said it focused on reviewing ongoing military operations against terrorists, bandits and other criminal elements .
Meanwhile, in a separate interview, the Defence Minister addressed the recent abduction of pupils in Oyo State, alleging that the kidnappers were seeking the release of detained commanders . “You know, it’s a very sad event. Unfortunately, bad things do happen. For whatever reason, they are looking for leverage because we have some of their commanders with us, and they feel taking these kids and holding them to ransom will make us release their commander” . He added: “They are now threatening that if we come any closer, they’re going to kill all the kids” .
The minister also called for stiffer penalties against kidnappers, including capital punishment. “I think we should do that. There must be deterrence. The laws are soft, and that’s why people take advantage. If they know once you commit an offence, there must be punishment” .
Badaru also rejected claims circulating on social media that soldiers were poorly fed, insisting that a viral video had been manipulated . “The soldier’s food was okay. There was meat; there was all this. But he told them to pull out those things and make it look as if those things were not there” .
As of the time of filing this report, neither the Presidency nor the Defence Headquarters had issued an official statement on the outcome of Thursday’s security meeting . The State House announced the meeting through a photograph released on Thursday evening but did not immediately disclose the resolutions reached during the engagement .
Soldiers Reject N100,000 Salary as Tinubu Holds Emergency Security Meeting
![]()
-
News4 hours agoBREAKING: Kidnapped Oyo Pupils, Teachers Regain Freedom After 55 Days + VIDEO
-
metro3 days agoRescue Hope Rises as Security Operatives Identify Oyo Kidnappers’ Network
-
metro2 days agoAppeal Court orders status quo in ISI hijab case, adjourns hearing to Oct. 7
-
News2 days agoEl-Rufai’s Wives Beg Tinubu for Fair Treatment, Say Family Is Traumatised
-
News2 days agoProperties Razed as Yoruba, Hausa Residents Clash in Ibadan
-
metro3 days agoMan Seeks Divorce Over Wife’s Alleged Refusal to Fund Daughter’s Treatment
-
Business2 days agoDangote launches free petrol delivery in Lagos, Abuja, five other states
-
metro1 day agoOyo school abduction: Bandits threaten to kill abducted pupils if troops advance
