'HNO Must Go' — WAEC Workers Declare After 9-Hour Talks End in Deadlock - Newstrends
Connect with us

Education

‘HNO Must Go’ — WAEC Workers Declare After 9-Hour Talks End in Deadlock

Published

on

'HNO Must Go' — WAEC Workers Declare After 9-Hour Talks End in Deadlock

‘HNO Must Go’ — WAEC Workers Declare After 9-Hour Talks End in Deadlock

LAGOS— The crisis rocking the West African Examinations Council (WAEC) in Nigeria has taken a dramatic new turn as workers have called for the immediate termination of the appointment of the council’s Head of National Office (HNO), Dr. Amos Dangut, adding a fresh and explosive dimension to their ongoing grievances over unresolved welfare issues and alleged unfair labour practices.

The workers, operating under the aegis of the Non-Academic Staff Union of Educational and Associated Institutions (NASU) , WAEC branch, made the demand at the weekend following a marathon nine-and-a-half-hour meeting between the union’s branch leadership and WAEC management last Thursday. The meeting, which began at approximately 6:30 p.m. and stretched into the early hours of Friday morning, ending around 3:00 a.m., concluded in a deadlock with no resolution on the majority of the workers’ demands.

According to the Chairman of NASU, WAEC branch, Mr. Kayode Ogunyale, in an exclusive interview with the Nigerian Tribune, workers have now resolved that the only path to peace within the examination body is the removal of the HNO. Ogunyale accused Dr. Dangut of being unwilling to address the contentious issues raised by the workers, noting that while their original demands were nine, the list had increased to 12 issues during the course of the agitation.

“But out of the 12 issues,” Ogunyale pointed out, “management only agreed to address five, which are less critical, leaving out the remaining seven.” He emphasized that the deadlock occurred despite the extraordinarily long hours spent in negotiations. “We started the meeting around 6:30 p.m. on Thursday and ended around 3:00 a.m. on Friday, with three recesses, yet only five minor issues were addressed,” he added.

Ogunyale stated that the matter should not have degenerated to this level if management had handled it with caution, especially with final-year secondary school students nationwide currently taking their terminal examinations. He noted that the union was initially moderate in its approach to show concern for the students, but management’s unfavourable handling of the issues forced their hand.

READ ALSO:

The workers’ demands, which have now expanded, include the suspension of staff upgrade programmes affecting career progression, the introduction of a minimum net pay policy, the formation of disciplinary panels without union representation, and disregard for seniority in promotions. Other grievances include the alleged victimisation of workersirregular recruitment practices, unfavourable changes in the WASSCE framework (including the reduction of examination subjects from 76 to 38 and corresponding shortening of the exam period), and excessive workload.

Ogunyale declared that the workers are now convinced that the HNO, as the Chief Administrative Officer of WAEC Nigeria, is not “ready to shift ground.” He revealed that the union’s position had fundamentally shifted as a result of the failed negotiation. “So, our number 13 agenda — which is for him to go — has now become the only agenda before us. We informed him of this last Friday during the meeting and have communicated it to our national body. We just do not want him again as our HNO,” Ogunyale said.

While declaring that their next line of action would depend on directives from the NASU national body, Ogunyale vowed that WAEC workers would not back down on their demand for the HNO’s removal, even ahead of the completion of his tenure, which is scheduled to end in September 2026.

The three-day nationwide warning protest conducted by NASU last week — from Wednesday, May 13, to Friday, May 15, 2026 — temporarily paralysed activities at WAEC offices across the country, including the national headquarters in Yaba, Lagos, and regional and state offices nationwide. The protest, which ran daily from 7:30 a.m. to 12 noon, saw workers carrying placards and singing solidarity songs while demanding improved welfare conditions and an end to what they described as “impunity” and “discriminatory practices” within the examination body.

The industrial action followed the expiration of a seven-day ultimatum issued by NASU’s national leadership to WAEC management regarding the nine critical issues. In a letter dated May 5, 2026, and signed by NASU General Secretary, Peters Adeyemi, the union warned that workers would embark on a protest if management failed to address the concerns within the stipulated timeframe. The letter was titled: “Re: A Call For Immediate Stop to the Shady Recruitment Interview Practices.”

The union’s grievances, as contained in the letter, included the suspension of staff upgrade programmes, imposition of a minimum net pay balance policy, unilateral constitution of investigative panels without consultation, reduction of WASSCE duration, coordinated attempts to weaken the union, breach of seniority principle in appointment and placement, incessant dismissals and disproportionate sanctions, examination for promotion, and indiscriminate recruitment of contract Examination Officers and Assistant Examination Officers.

READ ALSO:

In response to the initial protest and the union’s demands, WAEC management, in a letter dated May 8 and signed on behalf of the HNO by the Director of Administration, Eucharia Onodu, denied the allegations, insisting that the council operates within established conditions of service and has remained responsive to staff concerns. The management noted that it had looked at the policy on minimum net pay and decided to suspend it forthwith, with a memorandum circulated to that effect.

Regarding the reduction in the number of days for the conduct of WASSCE, WAEC management explained that the decision was based on directives from the Federal Ministry of Education “in view of the realignment/allocation of subjects.” The examination body clarified that the adjustment in examination days was necessitated by the streamlining of WAEC subjects from 76 to 38, and consequently, the shortened number of days reflected the new number of subjects vis-à-vis the hybrid mode of examination conduct.

However, the union rejected this explanation, arguing that the change was implemented without adequate consultation and that students and teachers had not been properly prepared for such a significant shift in the examination framework. This issue was one of the seven that management allegedly refused to address during the marathon meeting.

When contacted on Sunday for a reaction to the union’s demand for his removal, Dr. Amos Dangut told the Nigerian Tribune to contact the council’s spokesperson, Mrs. Moyosola Adesina (also identified as Moyosola F. Adesina), for a response, saying: “Get in touch with the Head of Public Affairs and direct your enquiry to her.”

However, when Mrs. Adesina was reached, she stated that she was not aware of the call for the HNO’s removal. In earlier press statements issued during the three-day protest, Adesina had reassured candidates, parents, school owners, stakeholders and the general public of WAEC’s unwavering commitment to the seamless, hitch-free and successful conduct of the ongoing West African Senior School Certificate Examination (WASSCE) for School Candidates, 2026.

READ ALSO:

Her statement read in part: “While we are concerned about the rights of unions and staff to express their grievances, we are also committed to ensuring seamless and smooth conduct of the ongoing examination.” The council maintained that all disciplinary and career progression matters are handled in line with the WAEC staff handbook and relevant statutory provisions, describing the union’s assertion of “incessant dismissal and inappropriate sanction” as “fallacious.”

The ongoing WASSCE, which commenced on Tuesday, April 21, 2026, involves a total of 1,959,636 candidates from 24,207 schools nationwide. This represents one of the largest examination cohorts in WAEC’s 74-year history of conducting assessments in Nigeria.

The current crisis is not the first industrial action threat by WAEC workers since Dr. Dangut assumed leadership. In December 2024, a salary review committee recommended a 30 per cent salary increase for staff, but WAEC management only implemented a 25 per cent increase, prompting NASU to call for a four-day strike. The strike ended after NASU and WAEC reached a compromise, securing a 27.5 per cent increase.

However, NASU alleged that even after the strike’s resolution, WAEC management continued retaliatory actions, including issuing an internal memo ordering the stoppage of NASU check-off dues deductions. The union noted that WAEC’s actions had violated not only the Memorandum of Understanding signed in March 2025 but also Nigeria’s Labour Act, specifically Section 5(3)(a), which mandates that once a trade union is recognized, employers must automatically deduct and remit union dues without requiring further consent.

As the crisis deepens, Ogunyale has made it clear that the union is prepared to escalate its actions if the demand for the HNO’s removal is not met. “We have communicated this to our national body,” he reiterated. “Further actions will be dictated by the NASU national body, but we will not back down on our demand for the HNO’s removal — even ahead of the completion of his tenure in September.”

Meanwhile, WAEC management has not issued any formal response to the specific demand for Dr. Dangut’s removal. The council’s Public Affairs Department has maintained that dialogue remains open and that management is committed to resolving the issues through established channels.

The unfolding situation represents one of the most serious labour crises in WAEC Nigeria’s recent history, with the potential to disrupt not only the welfare of its workers but also the integrity and smooth conduct of examinations for millions of Nigerian students. As one of Africa’s largest examination bodies, the resolution of this crisis is critical — and with the union now making the HNO’s removal its “only agenda,” the path to resolution appears increasingly uncertain.

‘HNO Must Go’ — WAEC Workers Declare After 9-Hour Talks End in Deadlock

Loading

Education

Appeal Court Overturns Hijab Verdict, Declares UI International School Can Enforce Dress Code

Published

on

Appeal Court Overturns Hijab Verdict, Declares UI International School Can Enforce Dress Code

Appeal Court Overturns Hijab Verdict, Declares UI International School Can Enforce Dress Code

The Court of Appeal, Ibadan Division, has set aside the judgment of the Oyo State High Court that allowed Muslim female students to wear hijab as part of the official uniform at the International School, University of Ibadan (ISI), ruling that the institution is a private school with the legal authority to enforce its dress code.

The appellate court delivered the judgment on Friday in a split 2-1 decision, allowing the appeal filed by the management of ISI against the earlier High Court ruling that recognised the students’ right to wear hijab while in school.

The legal dispute dates back to 2018, when 11 Muslim female students, supported by the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), instituted a suit challenging the school’s prohibition of hijab, arguing that the policy violated their constitutional rights to freedom of religion and freedom from discrimination.

In May 2024, Justice Moshood Ishola of the Oyo State High Court ruled in favour of the students, describing the school’s policy as an infringement on their fundamental rights guaranteed under the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

The court declared that the students were entitled to wear hijab with their school uniforms and restrained the school authorities from enforcing the restriction.

Dissatisfied with the decision, the management of the International School, University of Ibadan approached the Court of Appeal, arguing that the institution is privately managed and possesses the legal authority to determine and enforce its internal regulations, including its dress code.

READ ALSO:

Delivering the lead judgment, Justice Biobele Abraham Georgewill, with Justice K.I. Amadi concurring, held that previous Supreme Court decisions permitting the use of hijab apply only to public schools and not to private educational institutions.

According to the appellate court, although the school is affiliated with the University of Ibadan, it remains a private educational institution and is therefore entitled to establish and enforce its own rules governing students’ appearance and conduct.

Justice Georgewill ruled that the constitutional right to freedom of religion is a personal right that may be voluntarily waived.

He held that by seeking admission into ISI and signing undertakings to obey the school’s rules and regulations, students and their parents accepted the institution’s dress code and other conditions governing admission.

“In public schools, you can wear hijab on school uniforms based on the judgment of the Supreme Court. But the Supreme Court is yet to make any decision on the use of hijab in private schools,” Justice Georgewill stated.

The appellate court concluded that the contractual relationship between the school and its students gives the institution the authority to insist on compliance with its established policies.

However, Justice Fadawu Umar, in his dissenting judgment, held that the appeal lacked merit and should have been dismissed, effectively affirming the earlier High Court decision that upheld the students’ constitutional rights.

Following the judgment, the management of the International School, University of Ibadan notified parents and guardians that it would immediately implement the appellate court’s ruling.

In a notice circulated to parents, the school announced that from Monday, July 6, 2026, no student would be permitted to wear hijab or any headscarf with the official school uniform.

The management said all students are expected to comply fully with the school’s rules and regulations in line with the Court of Appeal’s decision.

The judgment has sparked fresh debate among legal practitioners, education stakeholders, religious organisations and civil society groups over the balance between religious freedom and the autonomy of private schools to regulate student conduct.

Supporters of the ruling argue that private educational institutions should retain the right to establish policies that preserve their identity and operational standards.

Others, however, contend that constitutional rights should remain protected irrespective of whether an institution is publicly or privately managed, describing the judgment as one that raises significant constitutional questions.

The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has expressed disappointment over the verdict and indicated that it would study the Certified True Copy of the judgment before deciding on its next legal steps.

Legal analysts note that the case could still proceed to the Supreme Court, which would have the final authority to determine whether private educational institutions can lawfully restrict the wearing of religious attire as part of their uniform policies.

Until any further judicial pronouncement, the Court of Appeal’s decision remains binding, paving the way for the International School, University of Ibadan to enforce its existing dress code.

Appeal Court Overturns Hijab Verdict, Declares UI International School Can Enforce Dress Code

Loading

Continue Reading

Education

Appeal Court Verdict: UI International School to Enforce Hijab Ban from Monday

Published

on

Appeal Court Verdict: UI International School to Enforce Hijab Ban from Monday

Appeal Court Verdict: UI International School to Enforce Hijab Ban from Monday

The International School, University of Ibadan (ISI) has announced that it will begin enforcing its dress code by prohibiting the use of hijab and headscarves with the school uniform from Monday, July 6, 2026, following a landmark judgment by the Court of Appeal declaring the institution a private school.

The school communicated the decision to parents and guardians through an official notice shared on its WhatsApp platform shortly after the appellate court delivered its judgment on Friday.

According to the notice, all students are expected to comply with the school’s regulations in line with the Court of Appeal’s ruling.

“Following the judgment of the Court of Appeal delivered on Friday, 3 July 2026, declaring The International School, University of Ibadan, a private school, all students are required to comply with the rules and regulations of the school.

“Accordingly, with effect from Monday, 6 July 2026, no student will be allowed to wear a hijab with the school uniform.

“Parents and guardians are kindly requested to ensure that their children comply with this directive. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.”

The directive follows a split 2-1 judgment of the Court of Appeal, Ibadan Division, which overturned an earlier judgment of the Oyo State High Court that had permitted Muslim female students to wear hijab as part of the school’s uniform.

READ ALSO:

In the lead judgment, Justice Biobele Abraham Georgewill, supported by Justice K.I. Amadi, held that the International School, University of Ibadan operates as a private educational institution and is therefore entitled to enforce its internal rules, including its uniform policy.

The appellate court distinguished the case from previous Supreme Court decisions that allowed the use of hijab in public schools, ruling that those decisions do not automatically apply to privately run institutions.

According to the court, while the 1999 Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of religion, students and parents who voluntarily enrol in a private school are deemed to have accepted the institution’s regulations, including its dress code.

The court further held that students admitted into ISI had signed undertakings agreeing to comply with the school’s rules and could not selectively disregard those conditions after admission.

Justice Georgewill noted that although religious freedom is constitutionally protected, it is not absolute in the context of contractual relationships voluntarily entered into with private institutions.

However, Justice Fadawu Umar, who dissented from the majority judgment, maintained that the appeal lacked merit and should have been dismissed, effectively supporting the earlier High Court ruling that recognised the Muslim students’ right to wear hijab.

The legal battle dates back to 2018, when 11 Muslim female students, supported by the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) and other stakeholders, challenged the school’s prohibition of hijab, arguing that the policy violated their constitutional rights to freedom of religion and protection from discrimination.

In May 2024, the Oyo State High Court ruled in favour of the students and declared that they could wear hijab with their school uniforms.

Dissatisfied with the judgment, the International School, University of Ibadan appealed the decision, arguing that the institution is privately managed and possesses the legal authority to establish and enforce its own rules regarding student appearance and conduct.

The Court of Appeal has now set aside that earlier judgment, effectively restoring the school’s authority to implement its uniform policy.

The ruling has generated widespread reactions among religious organisations, legal practitioners, education stakeholders and civil society groups, with many describing it as a significant decision on the relationship between religious freedom and the autonomy of private schools in Nigeria.

While supporters of the judgment argue that private institutions should retain the right to regulate their operations without external interference, others contend that constitutional rights should not be limited by school policies.

The decision is not necessarily the final chapter in the dispute, as parties dissatisfied with the appellate court’s verdict retain the constitutional right to approach the Supreme Court for a final determination on the issues raised in the case.

For now, however, the management of the International School, University of Ibadan says all students must comply with the school’s dress code beginning on Monday, in accordance with the appellate court’s ruling.

Appeal Court Verdict: UI International School to Enforce Hijab Ban from Monday

Loading

Continue Reading

Education

He Pinned Me to the Bathroom Door, UNIOSUN Student Recounts Alleged Assault by Soldier

Published

on

"He Pinned Me to the Bathroom Door" — UNIOSUN Student Recounts Alleged Assault by Soldier

He Pinned Me to the Bathroom Door, UNIOSUN Student Recounts Alleged Assault by Soldier

A female student of Osun State University (UNIOSUN) has alleged that one of the soldiers who invaded off-campus student hostels in Osogbo, Osun State, attempted to sexually assault her after forcing his way into her room during a late-night operation that has sparked widespread outrage.

The student, identified simply as Ademola, recounted her experience in a video that has since circulated on social media. According to her, she was alone in her hostel room preparing a meal when soldiers, believed to be from the Nigerian Army Depot, Osogbo, arrived in the area on Monday night.

She said the soldiers initially moved through the neighbourhood before returning later in the evening, knocking on doors, searching rooms and ordering students to open their doors.

“My name is Ademola, a student of Osun State University. I was in my hostel room cooking when I noticed they were around. After a while everything died down. However, later, we started hearing noise again,” she said.

According to the student, one of the soldiers directed a flashlight into her room and asked how many people were inside.

“One of them asked how many of us were inside the room and I told him two. I also told him my roommate wasn’t around.”

She alleged that the encounter turned violent after one of the soldiers entered her room.

“He pinned me to my bathroom door, told me I would like it. He also told me not to shout. So, I begged him.”

Ademola said she managed to free herself and moved towards the door while repeatedly asking the soldier to leave.

“I had to look for a way to get out of his hold and moved to the door. On moving to the door, I told him to move out.”

She further alleged that another soldier entered the room and attempted to calm her while encouraging his colleague.

“His colleague came in and also told me to calm down, that I would love it and that I shouldn’t shout.”

According to her, she raised the alarm by screaming loudly, forcing both soldiers to flee.

“When they started moving, I shouted and screamed. After shouting, they both moved out and I had to use force to close the door.”

READ ALSO:

She added that another student later came to check on her after hearing the commotion.

The allegation comes amid growing reports that soldiers invaded several off-campus hostels occupied by UNIOSUN students on Monday night. Multiple students alleged that military personnel stormed hostels in the Oke Baale and Shasha areas of Osogbo, physically assaulted residents and forcefully entered rooms.

Witnesses claimed that more than 20 student hostels were affected during the operation, with several students reportedly sustaining injuries after being beaten. Students also alleged that over 60 mobile phones, laptops and other electronic devices were taken during the raid.

Some female students further alleged that they were stripped and subjected to degrading treatment during the incident, while others claimed they were threatened and intimidated. These allegations have not been independently verified, and investigations are ongoing. Some residents also alleged that the soldiers demanded money from young people they encountered before proceeding to the student hostels.

The incident triggered protests on Tuesday as hundreds of UNIOSUN students blocked sections of the Osogbo–Ikirun Road, demanding justice for victims and the prosecution of any personnel found responsible. The protesters carried placards condemning the alleged assault and called on both the Federal Government and the military authorities to ensure accountability.

The management of Osun State University condemned the reported invasion, describing it as disturbing and unacceptable. Vice-Chancellor Professor Clement Adebooye visited some of the affected hostels and assured students that the institution would continue engaging relevant security agencies to ensure justice is served.

The university disclosed that it had formally notified the leadership of the Nigerian Army Depot, Osogbo, over the allegations and reiterated its commitment to ensuring the safety and welfare of students.

Responding to the allegations, the Nigerian Army Depot, Osogbo, confirmed that it had commenced an investigation following a petition submitted by the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS), Southwest Zone D.

In a statement issued on Tuesday, the Army said the Commandant had directed a thorough investigation to establish the facts surrounding the incident. The military assured the public that any officer or soldier found culpable would face appropriate disciplinary measures and any other legal consequences.

The Army also appealed to victims and witnesses to cooperate with investigators by providing statements and any available evidence to support the inquiry. The investigation remains ongoing.

He Pinned Me to the Bathroom Door, UNIOSUN Student Recounts Alleged Assault by Soldier

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending