metro
‘I am a mad man if I do not contest this’ — Ibori reacts to £101.5m forfeiture order
‘I am a mad man if I do not contest this’ — Ibori reacts to £101.5m forfeiture order
James Onanefe Ibori, a former Governor of Delta State, has broken silence over the UK’s Southwark Crown Court’s ruling to forfeit £101.5 million or risk eight years in jail.
In a Facebook statement, the former governor said that after more than a decade of confiscating and investigating his assets, Judge David Tomlinson’s July 21 ruling demonstrated that he could no longer trust the court to treat him fairly or give him justice, and that he would appeal the ruling.
Ibori had previously spent a five-year jail term in the UK from 2012 to 2016, after pleading guilty to ten counts of fraud and money laundering charges. In 2020, the UK authorities reopened charges against him, tying him to illicitly obtained assets worth £117 million.
On Friday, Tomlinson, a Southwark Crown Court Judge, ruled that Ibori must pay £101.5 million right away or face an eight-year prison sentence.
Responding, Ibori wrote:
“Albert Einstein is quoted as saying that the ‘definition of madness is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result’”.
“If that is true then I must be going mad because in over a decade since the British courts have been persecuting myself and those close to me, I kept believing that justice and fairness would eventually triumph.
READ ALSO:
- A’court nullifies order on e-transmission of election results in Lagos
- Bauchi govt sacks six traditional rulers
- Palliative: Bayero University to give staff, students loan to buy bicycles
“In hearing after hearing through the years, despite some of the most logic defying rulings against me, I still believed. Despite clear evidence of police corruption against the main officer in my case (evidence so strong that it caused the lead prosecutor to resign from my case), I still believed. Despite a clear victory in my 2013 confiscation hearing which left the Judge unable to make an order against me, only to have him rule that the prosecution should start the trial afresh some years later – I still believed.
“However, today’s ruling from Judge Tomlinson is difficult to comprehend and even harder to accept. I have to move past the fact that the British courts found themselves competent to sit in judgment over contracts awarded in Delta State; contracts that were legitimately awarded and completed. I have come to accept my fate despite the inability of the British prosecutors to show any evidence whatsoever of monies defrauded or indeed missing from Delta State.
“Since 2005, the British prosecutors have investigated my assets worldwide; they have had a restraint order in place on most of those assets and they are well aware that the total monetary value of those assets is nowhere close to the sums that were the subject of today’s order.
“Notwithstanding the fact that many of the assets are not and have never been owned by me – it seems that if you are my friend and you allowed me to spend some holiday time in your house, then by this order I now own your home and must ask you to sell it to satisfy the Order.
“The Order made today was to be paid immediately, this was made in the full knowledge that it could take many months to actually realise the sale of many of these assets.
READ ALSO:
- Tinubu slams Atiku over claims on Judiciary
- 46-year-old Nigerian dies mysteriously in Scotland
- NNPC breaks the jinx, pays N123bn interim dividend to FAAC
- Six die after consuming alcohol to settle fight in Ogun
“There is an eight-year default sentence, which means that if I do not co-operate and pay nothing at all, then the prosecution can apply for the imposition of the default sentence. However, as the prosecution already has a Restraint Order over the assets – the situation of my not co-operating or paying should not arise.
“However, an issue arises if my Restrained Assets are sold, and the total realised from the sale does not equal the amount in the Order, then the Prosecution can still apply for part of the default sentence to be applied, but they could only ask for a sliding scale reduction of the eight years default sentence based on the amounts that remain outstanding.
“If such an application were to be made it would be vigorously contested. In the normal course of events any talk of a default sentence would normally be stayed until any outstanding Appeal has been concluded.
“The Judge in this case has appeared to have cast aside any pretence of impartiality and has made an Order which is both wholly unrealistic and unrealisable. He has completely disregarded any arguments, evidence or expert witnesses in my favour. It was apparent during these last two days that he has forgotten many of the important elements of the case which is unsurprising as it almost 2 years since the case concluded.
“It has taken him two years to write this Judgment and in the interim he has presided over hundreds of cases, but I refuse to make excuses for him.
“At this point in time words fail me and so the question for me as I take my case to the Court of Appeal, is, if I continue to believe that I may finally get some Justice, is this the definition of madness? I know one thing for sure, that if I do not go to the Court of Appeal to contest this outrageous Order the people will definitely say that I am a madman!”
![]()
metro
Trump Denies Offering Iran Sanctions Relief, Release of Frozen Funds
Trump Denies Offering Iran Sanctions Relief, Release of Frozen Funds
US President Donald Trump has denied reports that he offered Iran sanctions relief and access to frozen funds in exchange for concrete concessions on Tehran’s nuclear programme.
Trump rejected the reports on Monday, describing them as false after Axios reported, citing unnamed US officials, that his administration was willing to provide sanctions relief and release Iranian funds as part of a potential deal.
“This is untrue. I offered them NOTHING,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.
CNN separately reported, also citing an unidentified US official, that Trump was prepared to offer similar concessions if Iran demonstrated concrete progress on the nuclear issue.
The conflicting reports emerged as US and Iranian officials engaged separately with mediators in a renewed diplomatic effort aimed at ending the seven-month conflict between Washington and Tehran.
READ ALSO:
- Nigeria XI vs Guinea-Bissau: Awoniyi, Lookman, Adams Lead Super Eagles Attack
- Federal Workers Back N500 Petrol Demand, Threaten Three-Day Warning Strike
- NNPC Profit Rises to N7.2tn Despite Revenue Decline
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has said Tehran is prepared to negotiate over its nuclear programme and other issues but would not accept what he described as pressure or coercion.
Iran maintains that it is not seeking nuclear weapons and insists it has the right to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has also said that diplomacy remains the route to resolving the conflict, while Tehran has linked any reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to the fulfilment of conditions under discussion with mediators.
The Strait of Hormuz remains a major issue in the negotiations because it is a crucial route for global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments. Disruptions linked to the conflict have contributed to higher energy prices and increased concerns about global supplies.
Trump had rejected an earlier Iranian proposal concerning the reopening of the waterway, while Araghchi said Tehran was awaiting a formal response through mediators.
The latest disagreement over the reported sanctions offer adds uncertainty to the diplomatic efforts, with Washington and Tehran yet to announce a final agreement on the nuclear programme or the broader conflict.
Trump Denies Offering Iran Sanctions Relief, Release of Frozen Funds
![]()
metro
Federal Workers Back N500 Petrol Demand, Threaten Three-Day Warning Strike
Federal Workers Back N500 Petrol Demand, Threaten Three-Day Warning Strike
Federal workers have backed the demand by organised labour for a reduction in the pump price of petrol to N500 per litre, warning that they will join a proposed three-day warning strike if the Federal Government fails to address their concerns.
The Federal Workers Forum (FWF) announced its position in a communiqué issued on Tuesday, September 29, 2026, after an online general meeting of federal workers held on Sunday.
The workers said they unanimously supported the call by the Joint National Public Service Negotiating Council (JNPSNC) for the Federal Government to reduce the price of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), commonly known as petrol, to N500 per litre.
The JNPSNC had given the Federal Government until September 30, 2026, to respond to its demands, which include a reduction in petrol prices, an immediate wage award and a review of salaries and allowances across the public service.
The Federal Workers Forum said its members were prepared to participate in the proposed three-day warning strike if the government failed to act.
The group also called for any reduction in petrol prices to be reflected in the prices of kerosene, diesel and cooking gas, arguing that high energy costs were contributing to the wider cost-of-living crisis.
READ ALSO:
- NNPC Profit Rises to N7.2tn Despite Revenue Decline
- Hamzat Clarifies Lagos Traffic ‘Lifestyle’ Remark After Backlash
- US Judge Blocks Trump From Tying Counterterrorism Grants to Election Rules
The workers said the current price of petrol was placing additional pressure on households through higher transportation, food and other living costs.
They also backed labour’s demand for an immediate Wage Award, which they said should be converted into a reasonable Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) to provide continuing relief to workers.
The forum argued that workers’ incomes had been eroded by rising prices and called for urgent measures to restore their purchasing power.
Beyond the immediate wage relief, organised public-sector workers are seeking the commencement of negotiations for a new National Minimum Wage ahead of January 2027.
The JNPSNC has proposed a minimum monthly salary of N500,000 for an officer on Grade Level 01, Step 1 under the proposed 2027 salary structure.
The council also wants salaries and allowances across federal, state and local government services to be harmonised and periodically reviewed in line with inflation.
The Federal Workers Forum had previously called for an upward review of the current N70,000 minimum wage, saying rising food, fuel, transportation and housing costs had reduced its purchasing power.
The workers also criticised reliance on food palliatives as a response to the economic hardship, arguing that a reduction in petrol prices would have a wider impact because transportation and the cost of moving goods are closely linked to fuel costs.
The forum urged Nigerians to support organised labour’s campaign for lower petrol prices and said federal workers should mobilise for any industrial action approved by labour leadership.
The group further backed proposals for greater use of Nigeria’s domestic refining capacity, including making crude oil available to local refineries in naira and expanding national petroleum storage capacity.
It said such measures could strengthen energy security, create economic value and reduce the country’s exposure to fluctuations in international oil prices.
The latest position by federal workers adds pressure to an already tense labour-government relationship as the September 30 deadline approaches.
However, the workers’ statement does not mean that a nationwide strike has already commenced. Their commitment is to participate in the proposed three-day warning strike if the labour leadership calls the action and the government fails to address the outstanding demands.
The Federal Workers Forum also expressed hope that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu would address the concerns in his forthcoming Independence Day broadcast.
The government’s response to the workers’ demands, particularly on petrol prices, wage relief and negotiations for a new minimum wage, is expected to determine the next steps by organised labour.
Federal Workers Back N500 Petrol Demand, Threaten Three-Day Warning Strike
![]()
metro
Hamzat Clarifies Lagos Traffic ‘Lifestyle’ Remark After Backlash
Hamzat Clarifies Lagos Traffic ‘Lifestyle’ Remark After Backlash
Lagos State Deputy Governor Obafemi Hamzat has clarified his controversial description of Lagos traffic as a “lifestyle”, saying the remark was taken out of context and was not intended as an endorsement of persistent gridlock.
Hamzat made the original comment while speaking at Podfest Naija 2026, where he discussed storytelling, the creative industry and how Lagos residents consume digital content during their daily journeys.
Using the experience of commuters on the Third Mainland Bridge as an example, Hamzat said traffic had become part of everyday life in Lagos. He also linked the long hours residents spend commuting to the growing consumption of podcasts, music, films and other digital content.
He specifically referred to journeys between Ojota and Obalende, suggesting that many Lagos residents listen to podcast episodes and consume other creative content while travelling through the city’s heavily congested roads.
The remarks generated criticism on social media, with some people interpreting the “lifestyle” description as an indication that the Lagos State Government considered traffic congestion a normal condition that residents should accept.
READ ALSO:
- US Judge Blocks Trump From Tying Counterterrorism Grants to Election Rules
- School Attack: 13-Year-Old Student Kills Teacher, Injures Two
- Bauchi Woman Arrested After Co-Wife Dies in Alleged Pestle Attack
Hamzat subsequently addressed the controversy, explaining that he was speaking about the relationship between Lagos traffic and the creative industry, rather than discussing the causes of congestion, road design or suggesting that traffic should be regarded as desirable.
He also questioned how his remarks had been connected to separate criticisms of the state’s traffic situation.
Hamzat said he decided to clarify the remarks after seeing how excerpts from his speech were interpreted on social media.
The controversy has nevertheless renewed discussion about the impact of Lagos traffic congestion on commuters, businesses and productivity.
Lagos remains one of Nigeria’s busiest urban centres, with long commuting times forming part of the daily experience for many residents, particularly along major routes during peak periods.
The deputy governor’s remarks also highlighted the opportunities created by the city’s large and diverse audience for podcasters, filmmakers, musicians, writers and other content creators.
His argument was that the time residents spend travelling has contributed to increased consumption of creative content, creating opportunities for the industry to reach audiences during daily commutes.
The Lagos State Government has continued to promote investments in rail transportation, waterways, road construction, junction improvements and intelligent traffic management as part of efforts to improve mobility across the state.
The debate has therefore shifted beyond the wording of Hamzat’s “lifestyle” remark to broader questions about Lagos traffic, urban mobility and the challenges faced by residents who spend significant time commuting.
Hamzat Clarifies Lagos Traffic ‘Lifestyle’ Remark After Backlash
![]()
-
International2 days agoIran Claims Capture of Second US Underwater Drone in Strait of Hormuz
-
metro3 days agoWoman Busted With Alleged Alcohol Hidden in Water Pack at Ogun Prison
-
News2 days agoFake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila Says He Never Betrayed Tinubu’s Trust
-
metro16 hours agoOsogbo Food Bonanza Turns Nightmare as Discount Vendor Vanishes With Customers’ Millions
-
News2 days agoAnambra Govt Demands Unreserved Apology From Peter Obi Over Debt Claims
-
metro1 day ago24 Hours in Darkness: Iju Ishaga Residents, Businesses Count Losses as Ikeja Electric Fails to Restore Power
-
metro2 days agoPassenger Dies After Jumping From Moving Bus In Lagos
-
Politics3 days ago2027: NDC State Chairmen Reject Obi-Kwankwaso Movement’s Parallel Structures
