International
Israeli Security Cabinet approves plan to take over Gaza
Israeli Security Cabinet approves plan to take over Gaza
TEL AVIV: Israel’s Security Cabinet has approved a plan to take over Gaza City, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said. The decision taken early Friday marks another escalation of Israel’s 22-month offensive launched in response to Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack.
The war has already killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, destroyed much of Gaza and pushed the territory of some 2 million Palestinians toward famine.
Ahead of the Security Cabinet meeting, which began Thursday and ran through the night, Netanyahu said Israel planned to retake control over the entire territory and eventually hand it off to friendly Arab forces opposed to Hamas.
The announced plans stop short of that, perhaps reflecting the reservations of Israel’s top general, who reportedly warned that it would endanger the remaining 20 or so living hostages held by Hamas and further strain Israel’s army after nearly two years of regional wars. Many families of hostages are also opposed, fearing further escalation will doom their loved ones.
Israel has repeatedly bombarded Gaza City and carried out numerous raids there, only to return to different neighborhoods again and again as militants regrouped. Today it is one of the few areas of Gaza that hasn’t been turned into an Israeli buffer zone or placed under evacuation orders.
A major ground operation there could displace tens of thousands of people and further disrupt efforts to deliver food to the territory.
It’s unclear how many people reside in the city, which was Gaza’s largest before the war. Hundreds of thousands fled Gaza City under evacuation orders in the opening weeks of the war but many returned during a ceasefire at the start of this year.
Expanding war risks countless lives and could further isolate Israel
Expanding military operations in Gaza would put the lives of countless Palestinians and the roughly 20 remaining Israeli hostages at risk while further isolating Israel internationally. Israel already controls around three quarters of the devastated territory.
Families of hostages held in Gaza fear an escalation could doom their loved ones, and some protested outside the Security Cabinet meeting in Jerusalem. Former top Israeli security officials have also come out against the plan, warning of a quagmire with little added military benefit.
READ ALSO:
- US offers $50m reward for arrest of Venezuelan president
- Kenyan pastor, two daughters face deportation after Canadian court rejects asylum claim
- Apprehension as 32 states, 832 communities now on flood alert
An Israeli official had earlier said the Security Cabinet would discuss plans to conquer all or parts of Gaza not yet under Israeli control. The official, speaking on condition of anonymity pending a formal decision, said that whatever is approved would be implemented gradually to increase pressure on Hamas.
Israel’s air and ground war has killed tens of thousands of people in Gaza, displaced most of the population, destroyed vast areas and caused severe and widespread hunger. Palestinians are braced for further misery.
“There is nothing left to occupy,” said Maysaa Al-Heila, who is living in a displacement camp. “There is no Gaza left.”
At least 42 Palestinians were killed in Israeli airstrikes and shootings across southern Gaza on Thursday, according to local hospitals.
‘We don’t want to keep it’
Asked in an interview with Fox News ahead of the Security Cabinet meeting if Israel would “take control of all of Gaza,” Netanyahu replied: “We intend to, in order to assure our security, remove Hamas there, enable the population to be free of Gaza.”
“We don’t want to keep it. We want to have a security perimeter,” Netanyahu said in the interview. “We want to hand it over to Arab forces that will govern it properly without threatening us and giving Gazans a good life.”
The Security Cabinet, which would need to approve such a decision, began meeting Thursday evening, according to Israeli media, and it was expected to stretch into the night.
Israel’s military chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, warned against occupying Gaza, saying it would endanger the hostages and put further strain on the military after nearly two years of war, according to Israeli media reports.
Hamas-led militants abducted 251 people and killed around 1,200 in the Oct. 7, 2023, attack that triggered the war. Most of the hostages have been released in ceasefires or other deals but 50 remain inside Gaza, around 20 of them believed by Israel to be alive.
Almost two dozen relatives of hostages set sail from southern Israel toward the maritime border with Gaza on Thursday, where they broadcast messages from loudspeakers.
Yehuda Cohen, the father of Nimrod Cohen, an Israeli soldier held in Gaza, said from the boat that Netanyahu is prolonging the war to satisfy extremists in his governing coalition. Netanyahu’s far-right allies want to escalate the war, relocate most of Gaza’s population to other countries and reestablish Jewish settlements that were dismantled in 2005.
READ ALSO:
- 6 die in Kenyan plane crash after Ghana helicopter disaster
- Students, parents, educationists berate WAEC over results review
- Prosecute Wasiu Ayinde ‘KWAM1’ for terrorism over Abuja airport misconduct, ADC tells FG
“Netanyahu is working only for himself,” Cohen said.
Palestinians killed and wounded as they seek food
Israel’s military offensive has killed over 61,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, which does not say how many were fighters or civilians. The ministry is part of the Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals who keep and share detailed records.
The United Nations and independent experts view the ministry’s figures as the most reliable estimate of casualties. Israel has disputed them without offering a toll of its own.
Of the 42 people killed on Thursday, at least 13 were seeking aid in an Israeli military zone in southern Gaza where UN aid convoys are regularly overwhelmed by looters and desperate crowds. Another two were killed on roads leading to nearby sites run by the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an American contractor, according to Nasser Hospital, which received the bodies.
GHF said there were no violent incidents at or near its sites on Thursday. There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military. The military zone, known as the Morag Corridor, is off limits to independent media.
Hundreds of people have been killed in recent weeks while heading to GHF sites and in chaotic scenes around UN convoys, most of which are overwhelmed by looters and crowds of hungry people. The UN human rights office, witnesses and health officials say Israeli forces have regularly opened fire toward the crowds going back to May, when Israel lifted a complete 2 1/2 month blockade.
The military says it has only fired warning shots when crowds approach its forces. GHF says its armed contractors have only used pepper spray or fired into the air on some occasions to prevent deadly stampedes.
Israel and GHF face mounting criticism
Doctors Without Borders, a medical charity known by its French acronym MSF, published a blistering report denouncing the GHF distribution system. “This is not aid. It is orchestrated killing, ” it said.
MSF runs two health centers very close to GHF sites in southern Gaza and said it had treated 1,380 people injured near the sites between June 7 and July 20, including 28 people who were dead upon arrival. Of those, at least 147 had suffered gunshot wounds — including at least 41 children.
MSF said hundreds more suffered physical assault injuries from chaotic scrambles for food at the sites, including head injuries, suffocation, and multiple patients with severely aggravated eyes after being sprayed at close range with pepper spray. It said the cases it saw were only a fraction of the overall casualties connected to GHF sites; a nearby Red Cross field hospital has independently reported receiving thousands of people wounded by gunshots as they sought aid.
“The level of mismanagement, chaos and violence at GHF distribution sites amounts to either reckless negligence or a deliberately designed death trap,” the report said.
GHF said the “accusations are both false and disgraceful” and accused MSF of “amplifying a disinformation campaign” orchestrated by Hamas.
The US and Israel helped set up the GHF system as an alternative to the UN-run aid delivery system that has sustained Gaza for decades, accusing Hamas of siphoning off assistance. The UN denies any mass diversion by Hamas. It accuses GHF of forcing Palestinians to risk their lives to get food and say it advances Israel’s plans for further mass displacement.
Israeli Security Cabinet approves plan to take over Gaza
ARAB NEWS
![]()
International
UAE Announces Social Media Ban for Children Under 15
UAE Announces Social Media Ban for Children Under 15
The United Arab Emirates has set a minimum age of 15 for social media use, becoming the first Arab country to introduce such a restriction as governments worldwide seek to address growing concerns over the impact of online platforms on children. The Cabinet resolution, chaired by His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President, Prime Minister and Ruler of Dubai, was announced on Thursday and forms part of a broader legislative framework aimed at protecting children in the digital environment. The resolution reflects the UAE’s commitment to establishing an advanced model for child protection in the digital space, reinforcing the national digital safety framework in line with the rapid evolution of technology use, and striking a balance between enabling responsible use of modern technologies and ensuring the highest standards of child protection.
Under the resolution, children under 15 are prohibited from creating, using, or operating personal social media accounts. The ban means they will not be able to post content, comment, share, or join public groups, open channels, or any large-scale interactive spaces. Crucially, parental consent does not constitute a valid exemption from the prohibition. Platforms are required to implement all necessary technical and administrative measures to enforce this ban, including monitoring personal accounts created by underage children and taking immediate action to suspend or disable such accounts. The resolution applies to all social media platforms operating in the UAE, whether free or paid, that enable users to create accounts or personal profiles, engage in social interaction, publish or share content, or that rely on algorithmic systems to display, rank or recommend content.
READ ALSO:
- Kingibe Denies Endorsing Akpoti-Uduaghan Suspension
- Witness Reveals How Sirika Approved Nigeria Air Consultancy Deal for Associate
- Police Arrest Boko Haram, Lakurawa Terror Suspects, Rescue Kidnap Victim
Teenagers aged 15 and 16 will be allowed to use social media platforms, subject to enhanced protective measures applied to their accounts. These measures include age-appropriate content classification and restriction, disabling high-risk features such as interaction with unknown users, regulation of usage time and duration, and the provision of parental control tools, allowing caregivers to configure account settings provided such configuration does not contravene prescribed prohibitions. The enhanced safeguards are designed to create a safer online environment for older teenagers while still allowing them to benefit from social media’s educational and social opportunities.
The rules apply to all social media platforms operating in the UAE and require companies to implement robust age-verification measures. Self-declaration of age will not be accepted as a valid form of verification. Platforms must adopt digital identity checks and artificial intelligence-supported technologies such as biometric tools to verify user ages, or any other mechanisms approved by the Child Digital Safety Council. They are also required to disable accounts created by children under 15, prevent users from circumventing age-verification systems, refrain from using children’s personal data for targeted advertising or behavioural profiling, and ensure data is not retained beyond the period strictly necessary. These provisions place significant compliance burdens on social media companies operating in the UAE market.
The social media age restriction is part of a wider Federal Decree-Law on Child Digital Safety (No. 26/2025) , which came into force on January 1, 2026. The comprehensive legislation establishes a new era of accountability for digital platforms operating in the UAE. The decree-law establishes the Child Digital Safety Council, chaired by the Minister of Family, tasked with proposing policies, legislation, and national awareness initiatives. It also establishes a platform classification system to assess risk and impact on children, and prohibits platforms from collecting, processing, or sharing personal data of children under 13 unless strict conditions are met. The law further mandates that platforms implement blocking and filtering tools, age-rating systems, and controls on targeted advertising, while also providing user-friendly reporting mechanisms for harmful content.
READ ALSO:
- Kebbi Police Arrest School Guard for Alleged Defilement of 10-Year-Old Girl
- Nigerian Migrant Arrested for Alleged Murder of Libyan Boss
- UK Social Media Ban Could Increase Online Risks for Teens — Telegram CEO
Social media companies will have up to 12 months to comply with the new regulations. The UAE’s media and telecommunications regulatory bodies have authority to take all necessary measures against platforms in the event of non-compliance. Penalties for non-compliance may include warnings, partial or full blocking of platforms, or administrative penalties. The Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA) will oversee compliance and enforcement, supported by the Child Digital Safety Council. The phased compliance timeline gives companies time to adjust their systems and procedures to meet the new requirements.
The new law also imposes obligations on parents and caregivers, requiring them to monitor their children’s digital activities, use parental control tools, refrain from creating accounts for children on platforms that are not age-appropriate, refrain from circumventing age verification mechanisms, promote children’s awareness of digital risks and safe usage practices, and report harmful content or child sexual abuse material to the competent authorities. These provisions emphasize the shared responsibility between platforms, parents, and regulators in ensuring child safety online.
The UAE joins a growing list of countries implementing age-based restrictions on social media. Australia introduced a world-first social media ban for under-16s in December 2025, while the United Kingdom announced a similar ban this week. Greece, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Turkey have also introduced or are considering measures to regulate children’s access to social media platforms. The UAE government said the measures were designed to address concerns over children’s exposure to inappropriate content, unsafe online interactions, excessive social media use, and the collection of personal data. As governments worldwide grapple with the challenges of protecting children in the digital age, the UAE’s move represents a significant step in establishing comprehensive legal frameworks for child digital safety.
UAE Announces Social Media Ban for Children Under 15
![]()
International
US-Iran MoU Details Emerge: $300bn Reconstruction Aid, Sanctions Relief in 14-Point Deal
US-Iran MoU Details Emerge: $300bn Reconstruction Aid, Sanctions Relief in 14-Point Deal
The United States and Iran have signed a landmark 14-point memorandum of understanding that outlines a path to ending hostilities, lifting economic sanctions, and launching a $300 billion reconstruction plan for Iran. The agreement, dubbed the “Islamabad MoU,” was read out by a senior US official to journalists on Wednesday and sets the stage for a comprehensive final deal within 60 days. The digital signing has already taken place between President Donald Trump and Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, with a formal in-person ceremony scheduled for Friday in Switzerland. The Iranian government has released its own version of the text, which largely mirrors the US readout, though with slightly different emphases on certain provisions such as the centrality of Lebanon’s sovereignty and the operational mechanics of sanctions relief.
The Full 14-Point US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding Text
Below is the complete text of the memorandum as read by the senior US official, beginning with the preamble stating that “The United States of America and Islamic Republic of Iran have jointly agreed in good faith on [a date yet to be determined], on the following:”
Paragraph 1 – Permanent Cessation of Hostilities
The first paragraph declares an immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon. The United States and Iran, along with their respective allies in the current war, undertake from now on not to initiate any war or any military operation against each other and to refrain from the threat or use of force against one another, while also ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon. The final deal will confirm the permanent termination of the war on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and other provisions of this paragraph. A senior US official emphasized that Iran bears responsibility for restraining Hezbollah, stating that “they have to get a collar on their dog in Hezbollah; they’ve got to hold them back,” making clear that Washington views this as a critical test of Tehran’s good faith.
Paragraph 2 – Mutual Sovereignty
The second paragraph commits both parties to respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and to refrain from interfering in each other’s internal affairs. This provision is designed to establish a baseline of mutual non-aggression that extends beyond the immediate military cessation, addressing long-standing Iranian grievances about US support for regime change and American concerns about Iranian influence across the Middle East.
Paragraph 3 – 60-Day Negotiation Window
The third paragraph establishes a maximum 60-day timeline for negotiating and achieving the final deal, a period that can be extended with mutual consent. This tight deadline reflects the urgency both sides feel to capitalize on the current diplomatic momentum while also creating a sense of pressure that could force difficult compromises during the negotiations. The clock is now ticking on this critical window, with the formal signing in Switzerland set to trigger the countdown.
READ ALSO:
- Former Minister Diezani Speaks on Emotional Toll of 11-Year Battle
- Iyabo Obasanjo Secures PDP Senate Ticket After Party Switch
- P-Square Feud: Peter Okoye’s Absence Delays Jude Okoye’s N1.3bn Fraud Trial
Paragraph 4 – US Naval Blockade Removal
The fourth paragraph requires the United States to begin removing its naval blockade and any disturbances or impediments against Iran immediately upon signing, with full removal within 30 days. During this period, the traffic of vessels will be in proportion to the numbers of pre-war traffic being restored by Iran. The United States further undertakes to remove its forces from the proximity of Iran within 30 days after the final deal. This represents a significant military de-escalation, as the US naval presence in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz has been a major point of tension and a primary tool of economic pressure against Iranian oil exports.
Paragraph 5 – Strait of Hormuz Passage
The fifth paragraph places obligations on Iran to make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge for 60 days only, from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman, and vice versa. The traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start, and considering the need for removing technical and military obstacles and de-mining by Iran, will be instated within 30 days. Iran will also conduct dialogue with the Sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz, in discussion with other Persian Gulf littoral states, in line with applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait. This provision is crucial for global energy markets, as the Strait of Hormuz is a vital chokepoint through which roughly 20% of the world’s oil passes.
Paragraph 6 – $300 Billion Reconstruction Fund
The sixth paragraph commits the United States to work with regional partners to develop a definitive mutually agreed plan with at least USD 300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of Iran. The mechanism for implementation will be finalized as part of a final deal within 60 days, and all required licenses, waivers, and permissions needed for the relevant financial transactions will be granted by the United States. A critical detail is that the US will not directly contribute to this fund. Instead, it serves as a framework for regional partners—particularly Gulf states—to invest in Iran’s reconstruction with US approval and sanctions waivers, representing a significant geopolitical shift that could reshape the Middle East’s economic landscape.
Paragraph 7 – Comprehensive Sanctions Termination
The seventh paragraph is perhaps the most consequential for Iran’s economy, as the United States undertakes to terminate all types of sanctions against Iran, including United Nations Security Council resolutions, IAEA Board of Governors resolutions, and all unilateral US sanctions, both primary and secondary, on an agreed-upon schedule as part of the final deal. Both parties acknowledge the critical importance of the sanctions termination issue and express their intentions to immediately address these issues in the negotiations in order to achieve mutual agreement on them. The Iranian version of the text reportedly places stronger emphasis on this provision as a fundamental pillar of the agreement, reflecting Tehran’s view that sanctions relief is the primary benefit it seeks from the deal.
Paragraph 8 – Nuclear Commitments
The eighth paragraph addresses the most sensitive aspect of the negotiations: Iran’s nuclear program. Iran reaffirms that it shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons, and both parties agree to resolve the disposition of stockpiled enriched material pursuant to a mechanism that will be mutually agreed upon in accordance with the schedule mentioned in Paragraph 7, with the minimum methodology to be down-blending on site under the supervision of the IAEA. The two parties also agreed to discuss the issue of enrichment and other mutually agreed matters related to Iran’s nuclear needs, based on a satisfactory framework being agreed upon in the final deal. The final deal will confirm the provisions of this paragraph, and both parties acknowledge the critical importance of the nuclear issues and express their intention to immediately address them in the negotiation. A US official described this provision as a “major, major win” for the United States, as it commits Iran to verifiable steps that roll back its nuclear program.
READ ALSO:
- Grand Chief Imam Denies Involvement in Prayer Event for Oyo APC Governorship Candidate
- 2027: I’ll Negotiate With Bandits Who Seek Peace, Fight Those Who Choose Violence — Peter Obi
- Ivory Coast Footballer Arrested Over Spot-Fixing Allegations
Paragraph 9 – Status Quo Maintenance
The ninth paragraph establishes a freeze on the current situation pending the final deal. Iran will maintain the current status quo of its nuclear program, and the United States will not impose any new sanctions and will not deploy additional forces in the region. This “standstill” provision is designed to prevent either side from taking actions that could undermine the negotiations or escalate tensions during the 60-day window, creating a stable environment for the difficult talks ahead.
Paragraph 10 – Immediate Oil Export Waivers
The tenth paragraph provides for immediate economic relief, as the United States undertakes that immediately upon signing the MOU, and until the termination of sanctions, the US Department of Treasury will issue waivers for the export of Iranian crude oil, petroleum products and derivatives, and all associated services, including banking transactions, insurances, and transportation. This provision allows Iran to begin ramping up its oil exports immediately, providing a tangible economic benefit that can be presented to the Iranian public as a concrete achievement of the diplomatic process.
Paragraph 11 – Release of Frozen Assets
The eleventh paragraph addresses the billions of dollars in Iranian assets that have been frozen or restricted in various jurisdictions around the world. The United States undertakes to make these funds fully available for use upon implementation of the MOU, with the procedures related to the release to be mutually agreed upon during the negotiations. Such funds, whether retained in the original account or transferred, shall be made fully usable for payment to any ultimate beneficiary designated by the Central Bank of Iran, and the United States undertakes to issue all necessary licenses and authorizations accordingly. This represents a significant financial windfall for Iran, though the exact amount and the timeline for access remain to be determined in the negotiations.
Paragraph 12 – Monitoring Mechanism
The twelfth paragraph establishes that an executive mechanism will be created to monitor the successful implementation of the MOU and the future compliance with the final deal. This monitoring body will be critical for building trust between the two sides and providing verification that each party is meeting its commitments, particularly on the nuclear front and on sanctions relief.
Paragraph 13 – Performance-Based Sequencing
The thirteenth paragraph contains the operational logic of the entire agreement, establishing that after signing the MOU and subject to the beginning of the implementation of Paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 10 and 11, and the continuing implementation of these measures, the United States and Iran will start negotiations regarding the final deal exclusively on the other paragraphs. This is the “performance-based” core of the agreement. Negotiations on the comprehensive final deal only commence after Iran begins implementing its commitments on the ceasefire, maritime security, and the US begins delivering economic relief. A senior US official described the logic: “If the Iranians dial up their good behavior, we respond by dialing up the kind of economic and sanctions relief that can make them a more prosperous country.”
Paragraph 14 – UN Security Council Endorsement
The fourteenth and final paragraph provides for international legitimacy, as the final deal will be endorsed by a binding UN Security Council resolution. This would give the agreement the force of international law and make it more difficult for future US administrations to unilaterally withdraw from the deal, addressing a key Iranian concern following the US withdrawal from the 2015 JCPOA under the first Trump administration.
Analysis: What This Means for US-Iran Relations
The Islamabad MoU represents the most significant diplomatic breakthrough between Washington and Tehran in decades, and several key themes emerge from a close reading of the document. The agreement is structured as a “performance-based” roadmap where Iran’s compliance unlocks specific US actions, creating a dynamic where both sides have ongoing incentives to fulfill their commitments. The $300 billion reconstruction framework, while not a direct US financial commitment, signals a broader realignment in the Middle East where Gulf states may be willing to invest heavily in Iran’s economy as part of a regional stabilization effort. On the nuclear front, Iran has agreed to on-site down-blending of enriched uranium under IAEA supervision, a provision US officials have hailed as a major victory, though the final deal will still need to resolve the broader question of Iran’s enrichment program and the extent to which it will be allowed to continue. The MoU provides for immediate oil export waivers and a phased removal of the naval blockade, but the comprehensive termination of all US sanctions will only come as part of the final deal within 60 days, creating a clear sequence of benefits tied to continued compliance. With provisions addressing Lebanon’s sovereignty, the Strait of Hormuz, and dialogue with Gulf states, the MoU signals a broader effort to stabilize the entire region beyond just the bilateral US-Iran relationship.
What Happens Next?
The 60-day clock is now ticking. Implementation of the initial provisions—ceasefire, naval de-escalation, maritime passage, oil waivers, and access to frozen assets—must begin before negotiations on the final deal can formally start. The final agreement, if reached, will be enshrined in a binding UN Security Council resolution, giving it international legal weight and making it more durable against future political changes in either country. All eyes are now on Friday’s formal signing ceremony in Switzerland and the subsequent negotiations that will determine whether this diplomatic breakthrough leads to a lasting transformation of US-Iran relations or proves to be another temporary pause in a long history of hostility. The coming weeks will test whether both sides can translate the framework of the MOU into a comprehensive agreement that addresses the full range of issues dividing them, from nuclear enrichment to regional influence to economic integration.
US-Iran MoU Details Emerge: $300bn Reconstruction Aid, Sanctions Relief in 14-Point Deal
![]()
International
Trump Declares “I’m the Boss” as G7 Summit Ends in France
Trump Declares “I’m the Boss” as G7 Summit Ends in France
United States President Donald Trump sparked global attention at the closing stage of the G7 summit in France, after declaring “I’m the boss” as he arrived for a morning session attended by fellow world leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron.
The remark was made as Trump entered the meeting room in Evian, a resort town on the shores of Lake Geneva, where leaders of the world’s major advanced economies gathered for three days of talks on global security, economic stability, and geopolitical tensions.
According to accounts from officials present, Trump made the comment while other leaders were already seated. The statement reportedly triggered laughter in the room, with Macron responding in a relaxed and conversational tone as the session continued.
“I’m the boss,” Trump said before taking his seat, after which proceedings moved on to scheduled discussions.
The G7 summit brought together leaders of the United States, France, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Canada, and Japan, with key talks centered on trade relations, international conflicts, and energy security.
READ ALSO:
- Oshiomhole Clarifies Remarks on Natasha Suspension, Denies Forgery Allegation
- Woman Sentenced to Death for Supplying Ammunition to Bandits in Katsina
- Three Records, One Night: Messi’s Hat-Trick Powers Argentina Past Algeria
Diplomatic sources said Trump remained a dominant presence throughout the summit, actively participating in discussions and supporting a joint communique at the conclusion of the meeting. His full attendance until the end was also noted as significant, contrasting with previous summits where he had departed early.
The gathering came at a politically sensitive moment, following heightened global tensions and recent international negotiations involving the United States. Trump’s presence added increased global attention to the summit’s outcome and policy direction.
At the close of the meeting, Macron extended a private invitation to Trump for a dinner at the Palace of Versailles outside Paris. French officials clarified that the dinner was intended as a working engagement rather than a ceremonial gala, amid domestic political scrutiny over the optics of hosting the US president in such a setting.
Observers say the “I’m the boss” remark has become one of the most talked-about moments of the summit, reflecting Trump’s assertive communication style and continued influence on the global diplomatic stage.
The incident has since circulated widely across international media and social platforms, adding a viral moment to an otherwise formal gathering of world leaders.
Trump Declares “I’m the Boss” as G7 Summit Ends in France
![]()
-
News3 days agoShot by Bandits, Saved by Soldiers: Dramatic Rescue of General’s Wife in Katsina
-
metro2 days agoDrugged, Beaten, Forced to Sleep with 60 Men Daily: Teenage Girl’s Harrowing Escape from Lagos Traffickers
-
metro1 day agoBREAKING: UK Court Clears Diezani Alison-Madueke of All Bribery Charges
-
Opinion3 days agoIf Nigeria Is Not Divided, We Will Never Have Any Sense in the North
-
metro1 day ago‘They Assigned One Girl to 3 or 4 Men Daily’: Survivor Recounts 20 Days of Rape, Torture in Bandits’ Den
-
metro2 days agoAbducted Kwara Monarch Dies in Captivity Despite N18m Ransom Payment
-
Business2 days agoDangote Refinery Announces New Petrol Price as Crude Oil Eases
-
News10 hours agoFG Launches FreeTV, Offers Nigerians Over 100 Free Digital TV Channels
