International
North Korea Approves Automatic Nuclear Strike Policy if Kim Jong-un Is Assassinated
North Korea Approves Automatic Nuclear Strike Policy if Kim Jong-un Is Assassinated
North Korea has amended its constitution to authorize an automatic nuclear retaliation in the event that leader Kim Jong-un is killed or incapacitated by foreign forces, a dramatic policy shift that has intensified global security concerns over the Korean Peninsula.
The constitutional amendment, approved during the opening session of the 15th Supreme People’s Assembly in Pyongyang on March 22, was publicly disclosed this week by South Korea’s National Intelligence Service (NIS) during a briefing to lawmakers.
Under the revised law, North Korea’s military is now legally empowered to launch a nuclear strike automatically if the country’s command-and-control system comes under attack.
The updated Article 3 of the North’s nuclear policy law states that if “the command-and-control system over the state’s nuclear forces is placed in danger by hostile forces’ attacks,” a nuclear strike “shall be launched automatically and immediately.”
The development effectively creates what analysts describe as a “dead man’s switch” system aimed at guaranteeing retaliation even if the country’s top leadership is eliminated in a surprise military operation.
READ ALSO:
- Kano Govt Approves 200 Riyals, Ihram Package for 2026 Hajj Pilgrims
- FG Introduces Mandatory Drug Tests for Secondary School Students Nationwide
- Fake Pastors Arrested in Anambra Assisting Investigators — Soludo
Security experts believe the move was strongly influenced by the killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, and several senior advisers during coordinated US-Israeli strikes on Tehran earlier this year.
According to regional analysts, Pyongyang viewed the Iran operation as proof that advanced intelligence coordination, cyber infiltration and precision air strikes could rapidly dismantle a nation’s leadership structure.
Professor Andrei Lankov of Kookmin University in Seoul said the constitutional revision reflects growing fears within the North Korean leadership about potential “decapitation strikes” targeting senior government officials.
He explained that the Iran incident likely served as a “wake-up call” for Pyongyang, convincing authorities that they needed a legally binding system capable of ensuring nuclear retaliation even if Kim Jong-un were unable to issue direct orders.
The revised constitution also reportedly strengthens Kim Jong-un’s direct authority over North Korea’s nuclear arsenal. For the first time, the constitution explicitly grants the chairman of the State Affairs Commission formal command authority over nuclear weapons while establishing emergency procedures for delegated launch authority during wartime or national emergencies.
South Korean intelligence officials further disclosed that North Korea has removed longstanding references to peaceful reunification with South Korea from its constitution, signaling a major ideological shift in Pyongyang’s position toward the South.
Analysts say the constitutional changes suggest North Korea increasingly views the Korean Peninsula as permanently divided into two separate states rather than countries destined for reunification.
The announcement coincided with fresh military activity near the inter-Korean border.
State media agency KCNA reported that Kim Jong-un recently inspected production of a “new-type 155-millimetre self-propelled gun-howitzer” at a major munitions facility. According to the report, the artillery system has a firing range exceeding 37 miles, placing central Seoul and large parts of Gyeonggi Province within striking distance.
Kim reportedly described the new artillery system as one that would bring “significant changes and advantages” to North Korea’s ground combat operations.
Military analysts note that carrying out an operation similar to the strikes on Tehran would be significantly more difficult inside North Korea due to the country’s strict internal security apparatus, limited internet access, restricted communications network and minimal foreign presence.
Kim Jong-un is widely regarded as highly security-conscious, often traveling aboard armored trains instead of aircraft and moving with heavily protected convoys and elite security units.
The latest constitutional revisions have heightened tensions across East Asia, with observers warning that the formalization of an automatic nuclear response doctrine increases the risks of rapid escalation during any future military confrontation involving North Korea.
Relations between North and South Korea remain tense despite occasional diplomatic overtures from Seoul. The two countries are technically still at war because the 1950–1953 Korean War ended with an armistice agreement rather than a permanent peace treaty.
North Korea Approves Automatic Nuclear Strike Policy if Kim Jong-un Is Assassinated
![]()
International
Iran Threatens Strong Response Against Nations Supporting US Military
Iran Threatens Strong Response Against Nations Supporting US Military
The Iranian military has issued a stern warning to countries in the Middle East against cooperating with the United States armed forces, declaring that any nation involved in actions against Tehran would face a decisive response from Iran’s military.
The warning was delivered by a spokesperson for the Iranian army amid growing tensions across the region and increasing fears of a broader military confrontation involving the United States and its allies.
According to the spokesperson, Iran is closely monitoring developments in the region and would not hesitate to respond to any perceived act of aggression facilitated by neighbouring countries.
“We warn some countries in the region of the consequences of cooperating with the American army,” the spokesperson said in a strongly worded statement. “Any country that takes actions against us will face a firm response from our armed forces.”
The statement comes at a time of heightened geopolitical uncertainty in the Middle East, with concerns mounting over possible military escalation following recent developments involving Iran, the United States, and allied forces operating within the Gulf region.
READ ALSO:
- Iran Threatens Strong Response Against Nations Supporting US Military
- From Police Cadet to Industrial Icon: The Story of Olatunde Badmus
- ADC Reacts to Defections, Says Tinubu Benefiting from Opposition Disunity
Although the Iranian military official did not mention any specific countries, analysts believe the warning may be directed at nations hosting American military bases or providing logistical support to US operations in the region. Several Gulf countries, including Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates, maintain varying levels of military cooperation with Washington.
Security experts say Iran’s latest remarks reflect growing anxiety within Tehran over possible coordinated military actions targeting its interests. The warning is also seen as an attempt to deter neighbouring countries from allowing their territories to be used for military operations against Iran.
Regional observers fear that continued hostile rhetoric from both sides could further destabilise an already fragile Middle East security environment. Diplomatic efforts by international actors to ease tensions have so far produced limited results.
The United States has yet to officially respond to the latest Iranian statement. However, Washington has repeatedly maintained that its military presence in the region is aimed at protecting its interests and ensuring regional stability.
Meanwhile, global markets and international observers continue to monitor developments closely amid concerns that any direct confrontation could disrupt oil supplies, maritime security, and regional peace.
Iran Threatens Strong Response Against Nations Supporting US Military
![]()
International
Miami Teen Receives 17-Year Jail Term For Boyfriend’s Fatal Stabbing
Miami Teen Receives 17-Year Jail Term For Boyfriend’s Fatal Stabbing
, the South Florida teenager convicted over the fatal stabbing of her boyfriend, has been sentenced to 17 years in prison after an emotional court hearing that left both families devastated.
The sentence was handed down on Tuesday by Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Christine Hernandez, who ruled that Malik would serve 17 years in a Florida state prison followed by five years of reporting probation for the 2024 killing of 17-year-old Yahkeim “Keimo” Lollar.
The tragic incident occurred on December 20, 2024, at an apartment complex in Miami’s Liberty City neighbourhood. Prosecutors told the court that Malik stabbed Lollar in the chest during an argument inside a parking garage near Northwest Sixth Court and 61st Street.
Although Malik was 17 years old at the time of the incident, she was prosecuted as an adult. Earlier this year, she pleaded guilty to manslaughter and carrying a concealed weapon without reaching a plea agreement with prosecutors, leaving the final sentencing decision to the judge.
During the hearing, Judge Hernandez imposed additional probation conditions on Malik, including mandatory yearly reflection letters about the crime and its consequences.
“You will have to write a letter December 20th of every year that you’re on probation acknowledging what occurred and how it has affected your life,” the judge said in court.
The judge also ordered a mental health evaluation for the teenager as part of her probation requirements.
READ ALSO:
- Six Nasarawa University Students Abducted in Gudi Night Attack
- Meet Jetour G700: The 904HP Luxury beast shaking up the SUV world
- Edo Lawmakers, 2Baba’s Wife Join NDC in Major Political Shake-Up
Court proceedings became emotional as members of Lollar’s family delivered victim impact statements. His mother, Nathalie Jean, expressed relief after the ruling and said she believed justice had finally been served.
“I’m glad today my son can finally rest in peace knowing that justice was served,” she said after the sentencing.
Jean added that she hoped Malik would reflect deeply on the damage caused by the stabbing.
“I hope that when she goes to prison and gets processed, she thinks about the lives that she destroyed and how much she affected our families,” she stated.
During the hearing, prosecutors reportedly played surveillance footage showing Lollar’s final moments after the stabbing. Testimony from investigators revealed that the knife wound penetrated the teenager’s chest and struck his heart.
Before the sentence was announced, Malik addressed the court directly and apologised for her actions.
“Every day I sit and think about the damage I caused,” she told the judge.
“The family wants me in prison, but I’m in my own prison for the rest of my life. This was my best friend, my love and someone I could vent to about anything and everything,” Malik added tearfully.
Defense attorneys had urged the court to sentence Malik as a youthful offender and place her in a correctional boot camp programme instead of prison, arguing that she was still a juvenile when the incident occurred.
However, prosecutors requested a tougher punishment of 20 years imprisonment followed by 10 years probation, insisting the seriousness of the crime required a substantial sentence.
Judge Hernandez ultimately rejected the request for youthful offender treatment, saying the evidence showed the stabbing was not accidental.
“Although I do believe that you are remorseful, I do not believe that this was an isolated incident of aggression,” the judge said.
Following the hearing, emotions remained high outside the courthouse. While Lollar’s relatives embraced one another and welcomed the ruling, some members of Malik’s family argued that the sentence was too harsh for someone who was still a teenager at the time of the crime.
The case has continued to attract widespread attention across the United States due to the age of those involved and the emotional courtroom scenes surrounding the sentencing.
Miami Teen Receives 17-Year Jail Term For Boyfriend’s Fatal Stabbing
![]()
International
US Warns Parents Owing $2,500 Child Support Risk Passport Revocation
US Warns Parents Owing $2,500 Child Support Risk Passport Revocation
The United States government has warned that citizens who owe more than $2,500 in unpaid child support risk having their passports revoked or denied under existing federal regulations governing child support enforcement.
The US Department of State said the measure applies to individuals who fall behind on court-ordered child support payments, stressing that such persons will not be eligible to obtain or renew a US passport until their debts are cleared.
In its advisory, the department stated that affected individuals are typically identified through federal and state child support enforcement systems and notified through email or postal mail using contact details provided in their passport records.
The agency warned: “If you owe more than $2,500, federal regulations do not allow us to issue you a U.S. passport and we may revoke your valid U.S. passport.”
It also urged affected persons to contact their state child support enforcement agency immediately to make payment arrangements and avoid passport restrictions or revocation.
READ ALSO:
- Shakira-Burna Boy song named official 2026 FIFA World Cup anthem
- NDLEA, DEA Bust Billionaire Drug Cartel in Global Sting Operation
- Mambilla Scandal Resurfaces After Ex-Minister Mamman’s Conviction
The State Department explained that even after repayment, a revoked passport cannot be used for travel, meaning holders must apply for a new passport before regaining full travel privileges.
It further noted that in urgent travel situations, coordination between state agencies and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to update records and clear names from enforcement lists may take about 2–3 weeks.
The department also warned that US citizens abroad whose passports are revoked may only be issued limited-validity emergency travel documents to return home, until their child support debts are fully settled and verified.
According to the agency, applicants must first clear all outstanding arrears through their state child support enforcement agency before any passport application can be processed.
The policy is based on the 1996 federal child support enforcement law, which allows US authorities to deny, revoke, or restrict passports for individuals owing significant child support debt.
While the law has existed for decades, the State Department said improved coordination and data sharing between state agencies and federal systems have made enforcement more consistent and effective in recent years.
US Warns Parents Owing $2,500 Child Support Risk Passport Revocation
![]()
-
metro3 days ago16 Killed In Fatal Lokoja–Okene Highway Crash
-
metro1 day agoHuman Traffickers Remove Teenager’s Womb to Punish Her for Rejecting Sex Work
-
metro1 day agoRCCG Pastor Faces Rape, Oral Sex Allegation as Church Refuses Suspension
-
Business2 days agoDangote Refinery Opens 2026 Graduate Trainee Programme For Young Professionals
-
metro2 days agoNigerian Doctor, Wife Slammed With Nearly $1m Fine Over Illegal Tree Cutting In California
-
Politics23 hours agoRivers 2027: Why Fubara Missed APC Screening — Yilwatda
-
metro3 days agoGrand Chief Imam of Oyo Land Visits CAN Leadership, Advocates Religious Harmony
-
Politics2 days agoFresh Crisis Rocks APC Governors’ Forum As Uzodimma, Abiodun Camps Emerge
