Protests break out as Maduro declared winner of disputed Venezuela election - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Protests break out as Maduro declared winner of disputed Venezuela election

Published

on

Protests break out as Maduro declared winner of disputed Venezuela election

Venezuelans have taken to the streets after the electoral authority officially declared President Nicolas Maduro the winner of an election that the opposition says was marred by fraud.

Protests have erupted across the country, with demonstrators even toppling a statue of Maduro’s predecessor, Hugo Chavez, in the state of Falcon.

In the Petare area — one of the poorest parts of the capital, Caracas — demonstrators shouted slogans against the president, and some masked young people tore down his campaign posters from lampposts.

Some protesters were also headed towards Miraflores, the presidential palace.

Police were deployed in large numbers across the city, and members of the National Guard were seen to be firing tear gas to disperse demonstrators. There were also reports of “colectivos” — pro-Maduro paramilitary groups — firing at protesters.

“It’s going to fall. It’s going to fall. This government is going fall!” some of the protesters shouted.

Public anger swelled after the National Electoral Council (CNE) on Monday formally confirmed that Maduro had been re-elected by a majority of Venezuelans to another six-year term as president “for the period 2025-2031”.

But the CNE, which is controlled by Maduro loyalists, has not released the tallies from each of the 30,000 polling stations across Venezuela, fuelling political tensions in the South American nation and calls for greater transparency.

Opposition representatives said the counts they collected from campaign representatives at the centres show presidential candidate Edmundo Gonzalez trouncing Maduro.

In a press conference on Monday evening, opposition leader Maria Corina Machado claimed her coalition had more than 70 percent of the votes tallied and catalogued in an online database.

READ ALSO:

“They show we have a president elect, and that person is Edmundo Gonzalez,” Machado said, turning to the presidential candidate, who stood by her side.

The CNE, however, maintained Gonzalez had failed to defeat the president, earning 44 percent of the votes compared with Maduro’s 51 percent.

Speaking in a televised address from Caracas on Monday, Maduro, 61, claimed, without providing evidence, that “an attempt is being made to impose a coup d’etat in Venezuela”.

“We already know this movie, and this time, there will be no kind of weakness,” he added, saying Venezuela’s “law will be respected”.

As Maduro spoke, demonstrators began to gather in Caracas, and some tried to block freeways, including one that connects the capital with a port city that is home to Venezuela’s main international airport.

Opposition leaders also rejected Maduro’s allegations, calling for peaceful protests across the country.

“The Venezuelans and the entire world know what happened,” Gonzalez said in his first remarks since the results were announced.

Later, during the Monday evening press conference, he reiterated his claim to victory while urging supporters to remain calm.

“I speak to you at peace, knowing the truth. And I want to tell all the Venezuelan people that their will expressed yesterday through their vote will be respected. We will make sure that happens,” Gonzalez said.

“That is the only path towards peace. We have in our hands the records that show our triumph — our overwhelming triumph that cannot be reversed.”

Eating breakfast on a bench next to an unopened business in Caracas on Monday morning, 28-year-old voter Deyvid Cadenas said he felt cheated.

“I don’t believe yesterday’s results,” Cadenas, who cast a ballot in a presidential election for the first time on Sunday, told AP.

As the political uncertainty continues to swirl, election observers and foreign leaders from around the world have urged Venezuela to release a full breakdown of the election results.

A spokesman for United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said the UN chief was calling “for complete transparency” and “the timely publication of the election results and their breakdown by polling stations”.

“The secretary-general trusts that all electoral disputes will be addressed and resolved peacefully and calls on all Venezuelan political leaders and their supporters for moderation,” Stephane Dujarric told reporters at UN headquarters in New York.

READ ALSO:

The Carter Center, which sent a team of electoral observers to Venezuela for the election, also called on the electoral authority to immediately publish the presidential voting results by polling station.

“The information contained in the polling station-level results forms as transmitted to the CNE is critical to our assessment and important for all Venezuelans,” the group said in a statement.

‘They robbed us’

Maduro, who first came to power in 2013 after the death of his mentor and predecessor Chavez, has presided over an economic collapse that has pushed millions of people to leave the country.

Venezuela also has been isolated internationally amid sanctions imposed by the United States, the European Union and others, which have crippled an already struggling oil industry.

Reporting from Buenos Aires, Argentina, Al Jazeera’s Teresa Bo said there was an immediate sense of disappointment amongst Venezuelans “who were hoping for change” at the ballot box on Sunday.

Many also expressed anger over the election results and how they were announced.

“What we saw happening on Sunday night is unprecedented in Venezuela. It was about one o’clock in the morning, on Monday morning, and the president of the electoral council came out and announced that Nicolas Maduro was the winner,” Bo noted.

“However, he never showed the results. We have never seen something like this.”

Venezuela’s Attorney General Tarek Saab, a Maduro ally, said on Monday that his office had launched an investigation into an alleged cyber attack on the electoral system that slowed the vote count.

Saab accused opposition leaders – including Machado – of being involved, but did not offer any evidence to back up his claim.

“What we’re seeing from the government right now is a government that is saying it won the elections, saying that it’s under attack,” Bo reported.

“This is not what people on the streets are saying. Millions of Venezuelans are convinced that there was massive fraud.”

On Monday morning, a cacophony of banging came from Caracas’s Petare and 23 de Enero areas – traditionally major working-class bastions for the United Socialist Party – as neighbours took part in a “cacerolazo”, a traditional Latin American protest in which people bang pots and pans.

“Maduro yesterday shattered my greatest dream, to see my only daughter again, who went to Argentina three years ago,” retiree Dalia Romero, 59, told the Reuters news agency in Maracaibo, a city in northwestern Venezuela.

“I stayed here alone with breast cancer so that she could work there and send me money for treatment,” she said through tears. “Now I know that I’m going to die alone without seeing her again.”

READ ALSO:

Ender Nunez, a 42-year-old driver in Maracaibo, also expressed disappointment. “We’re going to be in this nightmare for six more years and what hurts the most is that they robbed us,” he said.

Emergency meeting requested

Meanwhile, nine Latin American countries have called for an emergency meeting of the Organization of American States (OAS) permanent council due to their concerns over the election results.

Panama, one of the countries, also said it would be putting its diplomatic relations with Venezuela “on hold” and would withdraw diplomatic staff from the country until a full review is conducted.

“We are putting diplomatic relations on hold until a complete review of the voting records and of the voting computer system is carried out,” Panamanian President Jose Raul Mulino said during a news conference.

Al Jazeera’s Bo explained that the call for an OAS meeting was unsurprising, as the governments involved are largely “right-wing governments [that] have traditionally opposed Venezuela”.

Instead, she said “all eyes right now are on what left-wing or centre-left-wing governments in the region will say” about the results.

On Monday morning, the government of left-wing Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva called for the “impartial verification” of the results.

Gabriel Boric, the left-wing president of Chile, said his government would “not recognise any result that is not verifiable”, urging Venezuela to provide “total transparency of the election records and the process”.

In response to the international outcry, Maduro announced it would withdraw its diplomats from seven Latin American countries, including Panama, Peru, Chile and Argentina.

Opposition leaders also accused Maduro’s allies of attempting to surround the Argentinian embassy in Caracas, where certain political figures had taken refuge.

Eric Farnsworth, the vice president of the Americas Society/Council of the Americas (AS/COA), told Al Jazeera that the international community ultimately has relatively little power over what happens next with the election results

“The reality is, he [Maduro] does control the courts. He controls the electoral system,” Farnsworth explained, adding that Maduro also has good relations with the military.

“So there’s not a whole lot of leverage that the international community maintains at this point in terms of Venezuela, particularly when we understand that there are some countries around the region, such as Cuba, and around the world, like China, which continue to support the Maduro regime.”

Still, Farnsworth said international pressure could help defuse a potentially volatile situation — and ensure the safety of key members of the opposition.

“We have to be really careful that this does not get out of control, and I think the international community really has a role to play in saying, ‘Look, just because somebody ran for president does not put a target on their back.’ Their lives and their families need to be protected.”

He also anticipates the election crisis will trigger another exodus from Venezuela, as people seek economic stability and political freedom elsewhere.

“If you take hope away from those who have remained, they really face a question: Is it worth it to stay in Venezuela? Or should they seek their fortunes elsewhere?”

Protests break out as Maduro declared winner of disputed Venezuela election

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA AND NEWS AGENCIES

Loading

International

Trump, Xi Fail To Reach Major Deal As Tariff, Rare Earth Tensions Continue

Published

on

Trump, Xi Fail To Reach Major Deal As Tariff, Rare Earth Tensions Continue
United States President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping

Trump, Xi Fail To Reach Major Deal As Tariff, Rare Earth Tensions Continue

A high-stakes summit between United States President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping ended without major breakthroughs on tariffs and rare earth exports, leaving key disputes between the world’s two largest economies unresolved despite renewed diplomatic engagement.

The meeting, held in Beijing, came amid ongoing tensions over trade, technology, and supply chains that have strained relations between Washington and Beijing for years.

Although both leaders projected optimism and pledged to maintain dialogue, the summit produced few concrete commitments, disappointing many investors and global business leaders who had hoped for a broader easing of trade restrictions.

Trump’s trade policies toward China remain one of the central sticking points in the relationship. During his first term, the US president imposed sweeping tariffs on Chinese imports and encouraged American companies to relocate manufacturing operations away from China.

While tariff levels have fallen from the triple-digit figures briefly reached last year, duties on Chinese goods entering the United States still stand at nearly 48 per cent, according to Chad Bown of the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Both countries had reached a temporary truce in October last year under which Washington agreed to reduce some tariffs while Beijing maintained exports of critical rare earth materials to the United States. However, that agreement is due to expire in November.

Speaking after the summit, Trump revealed that tariff issues were not directly discussed during his conversations with Xi, raising uncertainty over whether the current arrangement would be extended.

“We did not discuss tariffs,” Trump told reporters.

Foreign policy analysts say extending the truce would have been the minimum achievement expected from the summit.

Patricia Kim, a foreign policy fellow at the Brookings Institution, described any extension of the agreement as “the most basic benchmark” for measuring the success of the meeting.

One of the most contentious unresolved issues remains China’s restrictions on rare earth exports.

Beijing imposed export controls on rare earth materials in response to Trump’s aggressive tariff measures introduced in April 2025. The restrictions have since disrupted supply chains for major American industries, including semiconductor manufacturers and aerospace companies.

Trump, Xi Fail To Reach Major Deal As Tariff, Rare Earth Tensions Continue

United States President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping

Rare earth elements are essential for the production of advanced technologies such as electric vehicles, semiconductors, radar systems, submarines, Tomahawk missiles, and F-35 fighter jets.

China currently dominates the global market, accounting for approximately 90 per cent of the world’s processed rare earths and magnets.

Analysts say Beijing’s ability to control supplies has become a major strategic advantage in its rivalry with Washington.

While the United States has accelerated efforts to build domestic rare earth supply chains, industry experts note that the country still lacks sufficient capacity to process and separate heavy rare earth materials independently.

The summit also failed to deliver major gains for leading American corporations that accompanied Trump to Beijing.

The US president arrived with a powerful delegation of business executives, including Tim Cook of Apple, Jensen Huang of Nvidia, Kelly Ortberg of Boeing and Elon Musk of Tesla.

However, expected business deals either failed to materialise or fell short of expectations.

Boeing shares dropped sharply after Trump announced that China would purchase 200 Boeing aircraft — significantly below earlier expectations of about 500 planes. Trump later stated that China could potentially buy as many as 750 aircraft in the future, but no binding agreement was announced.

The lack of clarity unsettled investors, with Boeing stock falling further in pre-market trading on Friday.

There was also no breakthrough regarding the sale of Nvidia’s advanced H200 artificial intelligence chips to China, despite Huang’s participation in the summit discussions.

US officials disclosed that both countries agreed on deals involving American agricultural exports and made progress on mechanisms aimed at managing future trade relations. According to officials, both sides are expected to identify up to $30 billion worth of non-sensitive goods for trade cooperation.

Trump also suggested that China could increase purchases of American oil. US Energy Secretary officials claimed Beijing had expressed interest in buying more US crude oil, although Chinese authorities did not publicly confirm any agreement or provide figures.

Business leaders remain cautious despite the renewed diplomatic engagement.

A senior American executive based in China told the Financial Times that while broader trade cooperation would be welcomed, companies still require “clarity” on timelines, tariffs, and the unresolved rare earth dispute.

Xi, meanwhile, sought to reassure foreign investors by declaring that China’s market would continue opening to international businesses.

“China’s door to business will only open wider and wider,” the Chinese president said during meetings with American executives.

Despite the optimistic rhetoric, the summit ended with few tangible outcomes, underscoring the deep economic and strategic divisions that continue to define US-China relations.

Trump, Xi Fail To Reach Major Deal As Tariff, Rare Earth Tensions Continue

Loading

Continue Reading

International

UK Health Minister Wes Streeting Resigns

Published

on

British Health Secretary Wes Streeting
British Health Secretary Wes Streeting

UK Health Minister Wes Streeting Resigns

British Health Secretary Wes Streeting has resigned from the Cabinet, triggering a major political shake-up in the UK government and intensifying pressure on Prime Minister Keir Starmer amid growing unrest within the Labour Party.

In a strongly worded resignation letter published on X, Streeting said it had become increasingly clear that Starmer would not lead Labour into the next general election. He argued that the party was now facing a “leadership vacuum” and insisted that Labour MPs and trade unions were demanding an open and urgent debate about the party’s future direction.

Streeting said remaining in government under the current leadership situation would be “dishonourable and unprincipled,” adding that the party urgently needs a “battle of ideas” involving strong candidates capable of rebuilding public confidence. While he stopped short of announcing a leadership bid, his comments are widely seen as a direct challenge to Starmer’s authority.

The resignation comes at a time of escalating internal tension within the Labour Party, following a series of disappointing electoral performances across the United Kingdom. In the May 7 local elections, Labour suffered significant losses, including more than 1,400 council seats and control of dozens of local authorities in England. The party also faced historic setbacks in Wales and further declines in Scotland.

READ ALSO:

At the same time, the rise of Reform UK has reshaped the political landscape, with the party gaining hundreds of council seats and taking control of several traditional Labour strongholds, particularly in northern and central England.

The developments have fuelled speculation over a possible Labour leadership contest. Former deputy leader Angela Rayner has been mentioned as a potential successor, although she has publicly stated she will not initiate a challenge. Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham is also frequently cited in political discussions, though he is not currently a Member of Parliament, making any immediate leadership move difficult.

Despite the growing unrest, most Cabinet members and over 100 Labour MPs have publicly reaffirmed their support for Starmer. Downing Street has also insisted that the Prime Minister has no intention of resigning.

However, political analysts warn that Streeting’s resignation could mark the beginning of a wider internal struggle that may reshape Labour’s leadership structure if further resignations or open challenges follow.

For now, Starmer remains in office, but the pressure inside the Labour Party continues to build as questions over its direction and leadership grow louder.

UK Health Minister Wes Streeting Resigns

Loading

Continue Reading

International

US Congressman Pushes Bill Requiring Religious Immigrants to Reject Sharia Law

Published

on

US Congressman Pushes Bill Requiring Religious Immigrants to Reject Sharia Law
United States congressman, Barry Moore

US Congressman Pushes Bill Requiring Religious Immigrants to Reject Sharia Law

A United States congressman, Barry Moore, has sparked nationwide debate after proposing a bill that would require immigrants entering America as religious workers to formally reject Sharia law and pledge loyalty to the US Constitution.

Moore announced the proposed legislation, known as the CRUSADE Act — short for Countering Radicalism Under Sharia and Defeating Extremism Act — in a statement posted on X and published on his official congressional website.

According to the Republican lawmaker, the bill is designed to prevent the promotion of religious doctrines that he believes conflict with American constitutional values.

“America is built on the rule of law and the supremacy of the Constitution — not foreign legal systems that conflict with our freedoms and values,” Moore said while unveiling the legislation.

The proposal specifically targets immigrants applying through the EB-4 religious worker visa programme, which allows ministers, missionaries and other faith-based workers to enter the United States.

Under the proposed law, applicants would be required to affirm support for the US Constitution and disavow interpretations of Sharia law that Moore claims promote religious persecution, restrictions on women and suppression of dissent.

“Anyone seeking entry into the United States as a religious worker must affirm their commitment to the Constitution and reject extremist practices found in sharia law that have been used to justify persecution, violence, and the suppression of basic human rights,” he added.

READ ALSO:

The bill has already received backing from several Republican lawmakers, including Andy Ogles, Josh Brecheen and Clay Higgins.

The development comes amid growing political campaigns around the “Sharia-Free America” movement in the United States. Supporters argue that political Islam and Sharia-based governance are incompatible with the American legal system, while critics warn that such measures could stigmatise Muslims and undermine constitutional protections for religious freedom.

The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, making the proposal likely to face legal and political scrutiny if it advances in Congress.

The controversy has also renewed international attention on Nigeria’s religious freedom concerns.

Earlier this year, Republican lawmakers Riley Moore and Chris Smith introduced the Nigeria Religious Freedom and Accountability Act of 2026, a bill seeking stronger US action against alleged religious persecution in Nigeria.

The legislation calls for investigations into violence against Christians, enforcement of anti-blasphemy laws and the implementation of Sharia-based legal systems in northern Nigeria.

The lawmakers argued that some blasphemy laws in northern Nigeria have been used to silence dissent, target minorities and deny due process.

Nigeria currently operates Sharia legal systems in 12 northern states alongside conventional constitutional law, mainly for civil matters involving Muslims, although some states also apply criminal Sharia provisions.

The renewed debate follows the decision by President Donald Trump’s administration to redesignate Nigeria as a “Country of Particular Concern” over allegations of religious persecution and sectarian violence.

Security concerns linked to extremist groups such as Boko Haram and armed bandit networks have continued to fuel international scrutiny of religious tensions in parts of the country.

US Congressman Pushes Bill Requiring Religious Immigrants to Reject Sharia Law

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending