US Congressman Pushes Bill Requiring Religious Immigrants to Reject Sharia Law

A United States congressman, Barry Moore, has sparked nationwide debate after proposing a bill that would require immigrants entering America as religious workers to formally reject Sharia law and pledge loyalty to the US Constitution.

Moore announced the proposed legislation, known as the CRUSADE Act — short for Countering Radicalism Under Sharia and Defeating Extremism Act — in a statement posted on X and published on his official congressional website.

According to the Republican lawmaker, the bill is designed to prevent the promotion of religious doctrines that he believes conflict with American constitutional values.

“America is built on the rule of law and the supremacy of the Constitution — not foreign legal systems that conflict with our freedoms and values,” Moore said while unveiling the legislation.

The proposal specifically targets immigrants applying through the EB-4 religious worker visa programme, which allows ministers, missionaries and other faith-based workers to enter the United States.

Under the proposed law, applicants would be required to affirm support for the US Constitution and disavow interpretations of Sharia law that Moore claims promote religious persecution, restrictions on women and suppression of dissent.

“Anyone seeking entry into the United States as a religious worker must affirm their commitment to the Constitution and reject extremist practices found in sharia law that have been used to justify persecution, violence, and the suppression of basic human rights,” he added.

READ ALSO:

• EFCC Arrests Energy Commission DG Over Alleged N500bn Money Laundering Probe
• Reuters: Saudi Arabia, UAE Secretly Bombed Iran During Gulf War
• Mourinho Wants Osimhen to Lead Real Madrid Attack in Major Rebuild

The bill has already received backing from several Republican lawmakers, including Andy Ogles, Josh Brecheen and Clay Higgins.

The development comes amid growing political campaigns around the “Sharia-Free America” movement in the United States. Supporters argue that political Islam and Sharia-based governance are incompatible with the American legal system, while critics warn that such measures could stigmatise Muslims and undermine constitutional protections for religious freedom.

The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, making the proposal likely to face legal and political scrutiny if it advances in Congress.

The controversy has also renewed international attention on Nigeria’s religious freedom concerns.

Earlier this year, Republican lawmakers Riley Moore and Chris Smith introduced the Nigeria Religious Freedom and Accountability Act of 2026, a bill seeking stronger US action against alleged religious persecution in Nigeria.

The legislation calls for investigations into violence against Christians, enforcement of anti-blasphemy laws and the implementation of Sharia-based legal systems in northern Nigeria.

The lawmakers argued that some blasphemy laws in northern Nigeria have been used to silence dissent, target minorities and deny due process.

Nigeria currently operates Sharia legal systems in 12 northern states alongside conventional constitutional law, mainly for civil matters involving Muslims, although some states also apply criminal Sharia provisions.

The renewed debate follows the decision by President Donald Trump’s administration to redesignate Nigeria as a “Country of Particular Concern” over allegations of religious persecution and sectarian violence.

Security concerns linked to extremist groups such as Boko Haram and armed bandit networks have continued to fuel international scrutiny of religious tensions in parts of the country.

US Congressman Pushes Bill Requiring Religious Immigrants to Reject Sharia Law

Reuters: Saudi Arabia, UAE Secretly Bombed Iran During Gulf War

Fresh revelations from multiple international media investigations have exposed how Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) allegedly carried out covert military strikes against Iran during the recent Middle East war, despite publicly distancing themselves from direct involvement in the conflict.

According to a detailed investigation by Reuters, Saudi Arabia secretly launched several retaliatory airstrikes inside Iran in late March 2026 after Iranian missiles and drones repeatedly targeted Saudi cities, airports, oil installations, and strategic infrastructure.

The report, which cited Western and Iranian officials familiar with the operations, said the attacks were conducted by the Saudi Air Force and marked the first known instance of Riyadh carrying out direct military action on Iranian territory.

Although Saudi authorities neither officially confirmed nor denied the operations, the revelations suggest a dramatic shift in the kingdom’s long-standing regional security strategy.

The covert strikes reportedly followed an intense escalation in the wider Middle East conflict, which began after joint US-Israeli military operations against Tehran earlier in the year.

During the conflict, Iran launched waves of missiles and drones across Gulf states hosting American military assets. Reports indicated that all six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) — including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman — experienced varying levels of attacks.

While Tehran maintained that its operations targeted US military facilities, civilian infrastructure was also affected. Airports, oil facilities, and energy infrastructure in Gulf countries reportedly suffered significant disruptions.

READ ALSO:

• Mourinho Wants Osimhen to Lead Real Madrid Attack in Major Rebuild
• Ohanaeze Tells Peter Obi to Drop 2027 Bid, Support Tinubu
• Real Madrid Crisis Deepens as Arbeloa Calls Out Mbappé Over Commitment

The conflict also affected global trade as the strategically important Strait of Hormuz became partially paralysed, raising fears of a global oil supply crisis and surging energy prices.

Reuters reported that Iran launched more than 105 missile and drone attacks on Saudi Arabia between March 25 and March 31 alone. However, following Saudi Arabia’s alleged retaliatory strikes and subsequent diplomatic contacts between both countries, the number of attacks reportedly dropped significantly in early April.

Western and Iranian officials told Reuters that Riyadh quietly warned Tehran of further retaliation if attacks on the kingdom continued, while simultaneously opening diplomatic backchannels aimed at preventing a wider regional war.

The latest revelations also implicated the United Arab Emirates in the conflict.

Separate reports by The Telegraph and The Wall Street Journal claimed that Emirati forces secretly carried out attacks against Iranian targets around the same period US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Washington and Tehran after five weeks of military confrontation.

One of the reported UAE operations allegedly targeted an oil refinery on Iran’s Lavan Island in the Persian Gulf in early April.

The refinery strike reportedly caused significant fires and temporarily disrupted refinery operations.

Despite the allegations, Abu Dhabi consistently maintained publicly that it sought regional stability and denied taking offensive military action against Iran during the conflict.

However, reports suggested the UAE adopted a more aggressive stance behind closed doors, believing Iran needed to face direct consequences for attacks on Gulf infrastructure.

The Wall Street Journal also reported that Israel quietly assisted Emirati operations through intelligence coordination and defensive military support during the conflict.

Analysts say the alleged covert operations by Saudi Arabia and the UAE represent one of the most significant shifts in Gulf geopolitics in recent decades.

For years, Gulf monarchies largely relied on the United States for protection against Iranian threats while avoiding direct military confrontation with Tehran.

But the latest reports indicate both Saudi Arabia and the UAE may now be willing to carry out direct retaliatory strikes when their territories are attacked.

The war eventually began to de-escalate after Washington and Tehran agreed to a ceasefire on April 7, 2026, though tensions across the Middle East remain high.

The developments have continued to generate widespread international attention amid concerns that future confrontations between Iran and Gulf states could trigger broader instability across global energy markets and international shipping routes.

Reuters: Saudi Arabia, UAE Secretly Bombed Iran During Gulf War

FG in Advanced Talks With World Bank for Fresh $1.25bn Loan Facility

The Federal Government is currently in advanced negotiations with the World Bank over a proposed $1.25 billion loan facility aimed at supporting economic reforms, investment growth, job creation, and improved competitiveness in Nigeria.

Details of the proposed financing were contained in a World Bank project document titled “Nigeria Actions for Investment and Jobs Acceleration,” which showed that discussions have moved into the critical decision-meeting stage of the lender’s approval process ahead of possible Board consideration on June 26, 2026.

The project has already progressed beyond the initial concept, appraisal, and negotiation stages, indicating that major policy reforms, financing terms, and implementation conditions have largely been agreed upon between Nigerian authorities and the World Bank team.

According to the document, the loan is designed “to support the government’s efforts to expand access to finance, digital, and electricity services, and strengthen competitiveness through tax, trade, and agriculture reforms.”

If approved, the facility would become one of the largest loans secured by President Bola Tinubu’s administration and the second-largest World Bank financing package obtained by Nigeria since the approval of the $1.5 billion Reforms for Economic Stabilisation to Enable Transformation Development Policy Financing in June 2024.

The borrower is officially listed as the Federal Republic of Nigeria, while the Federal Ministry of Finance will serve as the implementing agency for the programme.

Under the World Bank approval system, the decision-meeting phase represents one of the final internal stages before projects are forwarded to the institution’s Board of Executive Directors for formal approval.

The World Bank document stated: “The review did authorise the team to appraise and negotiate,” indicating that the proposed facility has successfully passed key internal assessments and is moving closer to final approval.

READ ALSO:

• Oshiomhole Wants Nigeria to Take Over MTN Over Xenophobia
• Trump Expands Efforts to Revoke Citizenship of Some Foreign-Born Americans
• Israel Jails Soldiers Over Virgin Mary Statue Desecration in Lebanon

The fresh loan discussions come amid growing public scrutiny over Nigeria’s rising debt burden and increasing dependence on multilateral financing to support reforms and infrastructure development.

According to recent debt figures, Nigeria’s external debt stood at approximately $51.86 billion as of December 31, 2025, while the country’s total public debt profile has risen to about $110.97 billion.

Reports show that between June 2023 and May 2026, the World Bank approved approximately $9.35 billion in loans and credits for Nigeria across sectors including power, healthcare, education, agriculture, renewable energy, social protection, MSME financing, and fiscal reform support.

Some of the major financing packages approved during the period include the $2.25 billion RESET and ARMOR reform financing package approved in June 2024, $1.57 billion for the HOPE and SPIN programmes in September 2024, and $1.08 billion for education and resilience programmes approved in March 2025.

Analysts say the latest loan request reflects the Federal Government’s continued reliance on concessional multilateral financing to sustain ongoing reforms, support critical infrastructure, and stimulate economic growth amid declining revenues, inflationary pressures, and foreign exchange challenges.

The development also comes days after the Accountant-General of the Federation, Shamseldeen Ogunjimi, warned that Nigeria may reconsider future World Bank financing arrangements if approval and disbursement delays continue beyond six months.

Speaking in Abuja during a meeting with a World Bank delegation led by Mrs Treed Lane, Ogunjimi stressed that Nigeria expects faster processing timelines since the facilities are repayable loans and not grants.

“If approvals take more than six months, the Nigerian Government may no longer honour such arrangements,” he said, according to a statement issued by the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation.

He further argued that prolonged approval processes could disrupt project implementation schedules, fiscal planning, and broader development objectives, urging the World Bank to accelerate the approval and disbursement of funds tied to Nigeria’s priority projects.

Economists say while multilateral loans generally offer lower interest rates and longer repayment periods compared to commercial borrowing, concerns remain over Nigeria’s rising debt servicing obligations and the sustainability of continuous external borrowing.

FG in Advanced Talks With World Bank for Fresh $1.25bn Loan Facility