metro
Retrieve my seized assets from buyers, Diezani tells court

Retrieve my seized assets from buyers, Diezani tells court
Diezani Alison-Madueke, the former Minister of Petroleum, requested the Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday to order the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission to reclaim her seized assets from their buyers.
The former minister expressly sought that the court order the anti-graft agency to reclaim the seized assets from the persons or businesses to whom they were sold.
Diezani made this motion in a revised application filed on her behalf by her attorney, Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), before Justice Inyang Ekwo.
She requested an injunction to overturn the EFCC’s public notice, which served as the foundation for the public auction of her assets.
She also requested the court to declare the EFCC’s public auction a violation of legislative laws, including the EFCC Act of 2004 and the Proceeds of Crime Recovery and Management Act of 2022.
Diezani claimed that the sale violated her right to a fair hearing, as stipulated by Section 36(1) of the 1999 Constitution (as modified).
She also requested an order prohibiting the EFCC from disposing of her properties as indicated in the public notice, as well as an order vacating the EFCC’s notice, which was based on a number of judgements and decrees in its favour.
She claimed that the final forfeiture orders imposed on her possessions breached her proprietary rights owing to a lack of jurisdiction and the denial of a fair hearing.
READ ALSO:
- Dangote, Amosun disagree on Ogun cement factory demolition, Abiodun facilitates rebuilding
- FG partners Femadec Energy to establish CNG centres in varsities
- SGF delays appointment letters of River Basin new executives
The former minister also requested an extension of time to seek court leave to rescind, discharge, or set aside the EFCC’s public notice.
The EFCC published in a public notice that Diezani’s assets would be sold between January 9 and January 13, 2023.
Diezani filed a lawsuit against the EFCC shortly after the announcement.
In an originating action designated FHC/ABJ/CS/21/2023, filed on January 6, 2023, she requested an extension of time to apply for an order setting aside the public notice and preventing the auction of her assets.
However, in a counter-affidavit filed on March 14, the EFCC asked the court to dismiss the complaint.
The declaration, signed by litigation officer Oyakhilome Ekienabor, disputed various accusations made by Alison-Madueke.
Ekienabor noted that thorough investigations into the former minister’s actions during her tenure resulted in criminal charges against her in several courts, including the Federal High Court.
He referenced charges filed in 2017 and 2018 as evidence against her, stating that the properties were sold in accordance with final forfeiture orders issued by the Federal High Court on July 9, 2019, and September 10, 2019.
According to Ekienabor, the forfeiture orders did not violate Diezani’s right to a fair hearing, and the properties were disposed of in accordance with due process.
“The cases leading to the forfeiture orders were actions in rem, and the decisions are binding on all,” said the judge.
He noted that during the forfeiture proceedings, the court directed the EFCC to issue a notice seeking interested parties to show cause why the properties should not be forfeited.
Ekienabor further noted that Diezani was represented in one of the cases, but the court imposed the final forfeiture orders after considering her counsel’s views.
On February 17, Justice Ekwo allowed the former minister’s request to amend her claim, following a petition by her counsel, Godwin Iyinbor.
At the resumed hearing on Monday, Iyinbor informed the court that an updated originating motion was filed and served on the EFCC on February 20th.
He asked for an adjournment to answer to the commission’s counter-affidavit, which was submitted on March 14.
Justice Ekwo underlined the importance of expediting the case, which has been pending since 2023.
Divine Oguru, the EFCC’s counsel, apologised for the delay in answering and told the court that he would be ready for the next hearing.
“We will be ready to go on the next adjourned date, my lord,” he said.
The judge subsequently adjourned the case to March 27 for a hearing.
Retrieve my seized assets from buyers, Diezani tells court
metro
Explosion in Yobe, three people hospitalised

Explosion in Yobe, three people hospitalised
At least 3 persons have been hospitalised after an undetonated Improvised Explosive Device exploded in Gujba Local Government Area of Yobe State.
The explosion took place on Saturday at Ngomari Community in Buni Yadi, headquarters of Gujba Local Government Area.
A reliable source in the area told Daily Trust that the incident happened when a 22-year-old discovered live ammunition and four AK47 rounds while fetching firewood in the bush.
“The young man attempted to open the ammunition out of curiosity.
READ ALSO:
- Rivers: Presidency reveals security intelligence leading to emergency rule
- Shehu Sani faults senators taking voice vote objection to media
- Abducted Anambra Rev Fr released after police, gunmen fierce battle
“He proceeded to strike the ammunition with a hammer, which triggered an explosion. 3 persons including the young man sustained various degrees of injury,” the source said.
Confirming the incident, the Secretary of the Local Metal Fabricators Association, Gujba LG, Malam Isyaku Dahiru, said the victims were moved to Yobe State Specialist Hospital Buni Yadi for urgent treatment.
Efforts to get the reaction of the Public Relations Officer of the Yobe State Police Command, SP Dungus Abdulkarim, were not successful as he did not pick his calls and was yet to reply to the calls as at the time of filing this report.
Boko Haram terrorists have been using IEDs to launch attacks on communities in the area.
Explosion in Yobe, three people hospitalised
metro
Rivers: Presidency reveals security intelligence leading to emergency rule

Rivers: Presidency reveals security intelligence leading to emergency rule
The Presidency has revealed that security intelligence reports led to the suspension of Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, and elected members of the State House of Assembly.
According to the government, militants were already targeting oil pipelines, posing a serious threat to national security and the economy.
Bayo Onanuga, Special Adviser to President Bola Tinubu on Information and Strategy, disclosed this in an article titled “Imagine Rivers State Without a State of Emergency”, published on Sunday.
He maintained that intelligence reports showed an escalating crisis in the oil-rich state.
President Tinubu, in a nationwide broadcast on Tuesday, explained that his efforts to mediate the political conflict in Rivers had been ignored. He stated that worsening security threats necessitated the declaration of a state of emergency.
“The latest security reports made available to me show that between yesterday and today, there have been disturbing incidents of vandalization of pipelines by some militants, without the governor taking any action to curtail them. I have, of course, given stern orders to the security agencies to ensure the safety of the good people of Rivers State and the oil pipelines,” Tinubu said while announcing the emergency rule.
READ ALSO:
- Shehu Sani faults senators taking voice vote objection to media
- Abducted Anambra Rev Fr released after police, gunmen fierce battle
- Group tackles Natasha over call for drug test on senators
The decision has drawn criticism from various quarters, with many questioning its necessity. However, the Presidency has defended the move, insisting it was based on credible security intelligence.
Onanuga explained that Section 305 of the Constitution empowers the President to act when there is a threat to law, order, or economic security.
“Impeachment threats might have spurred attacks on lawmakers by the governor’s supporters, while militants in the creeks—primed to sabotage critical oil infrastructure—could have plunged Nigeria’s oil production back to pre-2023 lows,” he stated.
He further alleged that militants were awaiting instructions from Fubara before launching attacks on pipelines.
“Intelligence confirmed that militants, told by Fubara to await signals, were already targeting pipelines, risking a collapse in output and a Niger-Delta domino effect,” Onanuga added.
According to him, Tinubu’s intervention was crucial, as Rivers State is a key player in Nigeria’s oil sector. He warned that any disruption in the region could have dire economic consequences.
He dismissed claims that the emergency rule undermines democracy, arguing that it is a “temporary, surgical” measure aimed at restoring order rather than replacing democratic institutions.
Rivers: Presidency reveals security intelligence leading to emergency rule
metro
Shehu Sani faults senators taking voice vote objection to media

Shehu Sani faults senators taking voice vote objection to media
A former senator who represented Kaduna Central Senatorial District has slammed lawmakers for going to the media to raise objections against the adoption of voice voting for the confirmation of a State of Emergency in Rivers State.
Shehu Sani said that any lawmaker who wished to raise such an objection ought to have done so in the chambers of the National Assembly and not the media.
Recall that members of the National Assembly had voted on the proclamation of a State of Emergency in Rivers by President Bola Tinubu.
However, rather than adhere to the provisions of the law by taking a head count to determine that the Assembly had formed a quorum, the leadership of both chambers adopted voice voting.
READ ALSO:
- Abducted Anambra Rev Fr released after police, gunmen fierce battle
- Group tackles Natasha over call for drug test on senators
- Taraba police spokesman Abdullahi Usman is dead
Shortly after the voting process which was condemned by many including Peter Obi, Atiku Abubakar, and the Peoples Democratic Party among others, Ireti Kingibe, a serving lawmaker condemned the process.
In his reaction, to this Sani said all objections should be done within the chambers, not outside or in the media.
He wrote on X, “If any lawmaker had issues with voice votes or quorum, he or she is supposed to raise a point of order on the floor and insist on being heard; and not be silent in the chamber then come to the media to raise objections.
“If there is no quorum, it’s because some lawmakers deliberately chose to abstain,” Sani noted.
Shehu Sani faults senators taking voice vote objection to media
-
metro3 days ago
Natasha: Court blocks recall attempt, stops INEC
-
Sports3 days ago
Odegbami speaks on Osimhen breaking his 44-year goals record
-
Entertainment3 days ago
I didn’t snatch Asake’s mother from her husband -Musibau Alani
-
Entertainment1 day ago
Some ladies in movie industry ready to sleep their way to fame — Jide Kosoko
-
metro17 hours ago
Court refers Ojukwu property case to alternative dispute resolution
-
metro3 days ago
Oluwo accuses Ooni of plotting to dethrone him
-
metro1 day ago
Presidency blasts Jonathan, Soyinka over comments on emergency rule in Rivers
-
metro3 days ago
Boko Haram attacks military base in Adamawa