With possible Iran-Israel ceasefire, Trump's high-risk strikes may pay off – Newstrends
Connect with us

International

With possible Iran-Israel ceasefire, Trump’s high-risk strikes may pay off

Published

on

U.S President Donald Trump

With possible Iran-Israel ceasefire, Trump’s high-risk strikes may pay off

US President Donald Trump took a gamble by inserting the US into the worsening conflict between Israel and Iran, but it may have paid off – at least for now.

Trump announced on Monday evening that the two countries had agreed to a ceasefire that he said could lead to a lasting peace.

If the American president has in fact ended what he labelled the “12 Day War”, it would make for a significant step back from the brink of a conflict that seemed on the verge of engulfing the region, along with pulling America further in after US airstrikes hit Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday.

“Provided that the Israeli regime stops its illegal aggression against the Iranian people no later than 4 am Tehran time,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a statement, “we have no intention to continue our response afterwards.”

It may not be called a ceasefire, but as the 04:00 deadline arrived in Tehran the Israeli attacks reportedly came to a halt. The two parties appear to be on the verge of turning down the heat.

This development comes after a tumultuous day in the region, when Iran followed through on its promise to retaliate for Saturday’s US strike.

According to early reports, all the Iranian missiles directed at the massive US base in Qatar were intercepted and there were no American casualties or damage.

During his address to the nation on Saturday night, President Trump warned that there would be an overwhelming American answer to any Iranian attacks on US interests. He promised that there were more targets that could be struck by American forces if needed.

READ ALSO:

For more than 24 hours, the world waited to see what Iran would do. Once Iran had acted, attention swung back to the US president and, after a few hours, he had his first say.

“Iran has officially responded to our Obliteration of their Nuclear Facilities with a very weak response, which we expected, and have very effectively countered,” Trump posted on his social media site.

He said that Iran had gotten it out of their “system” and added that “perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region”.

While the damage is reported to limited, Trump seemed inclined to hold his fire in the hope that the Iranians would be willing to negotiate in earnest. And, behind the scenes, the White House says he was talking to Qatari mediators and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to work out the details of the ceasefire.

Trump’s weekend attack on Iran was a high-risk manoeuvre, but a scenario in which the pay-offs are already coming into view.

A similar dynamic played itself out in January 2020, when Trump ordered the targeted killing of Iranian Revolutionary Guard leader Qasem Soleimani in Baghdad.

Iran launched missiles at military bases in Iraq, injuring more than 100 American soldiers, but the US chose not to escalate. Cooler heads ultimately prevailed.

According to US media, in their latest attack on Monday, Iran fired a number of missiles at American bases equal to the total number of bombs US warplanes dropped during its weekend attack.

That, along with the advance notice Iran provided to the Qatari government prior to the launch, for which Trump said he was grateful, suggests the Iranians are seeking proportionality, not escalation.

For most of the day, Trump was more focused on the price of oil, American media coverage and a suggestion by former Russian President Dimitry Medvedev that an outside nation provide Iran with nuclear weapons.

US officials have stated that this president follows through on his threats, in contrast with some of his predecessors.

If Iran were to launch another round of attacks – and there were American deaths or significant damage – pressure would mount for Trump to respond.

For the moment, however, he is seemingly eyeing an off-ramp to more fighting and both countries appear willing to entertain it.

BBC

With possible Iran-Israel ceasefire, Trump’s high-risk strikes may pay off

International

I’m ‘disappointed but not done’ with Putin, Trump tells BBC

Published

on

Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S President Donald Trump

I’m ‘disappointed but not done’ with Putin, Trump tells BBC

Donald Trump has said that he is disappointed but not done with Vladimir Putin, in an exclusive phone call with the BBC.

The US president was pressed on whether he trusts the Russian leader, and replied: “I trust almost no-one.”

Trump was speaking hours after he announced plans to send weapons to Ukraine and warned of severe tariffs on Russia if there was no ceasefire deal in 50 days.

In an interview from the Oval Office, the president also endorsed Nato, having once described it as obsolete, and affirmed his support for the organisation’s common defence principle.

The president made the phone call, which lasted 20 minutes, to the BBC after conversations about a potential interview to mark one year on since the attempt on his life at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

Asked about whether surviving the assassination attempt had changed him, Trump said he liked to think about it as little as possible.

“I don’t like to think about if it did change me,” Trump said. Dwelling on it, he added, “could be life-changing”.

READ ALSO:

Having just met with Nato chief Mark Rutte at the White House, however, the president spent a significant portion of the interview expanding on his disappointment with the Russian leader.

Trump said that he had thought a deal was on the cards with Russia four different times.

When asked by the BBC if he was done with Putin, the president replied: “I’m disappointed in him, but I’m not done with him. But I’m disappointed in him.”

Pressed on how Trump would get Putin to “stop the bloodshed” the US president said: “We’re working it, Gary.”

“We’ll have a great conversation. I’ll say: ‘That’s good, I’ll think we’re close to getting it done,’ and then he’ll knock down a building in Kyiv.”

The conversation moved onto Nato, which Trump has previously criticised as “obsolete”.

Asked if he still thought this was the case, he said: “No. I think Nato is now becoming the opposite of that” because the alliance was “paying their own bills”.

He said he still believed in collective defence, because it meant smaller countries could defend themselves against larger ones.

I’m ‘disappointed but not done’ with Putin, Trump tells BBC

BBC

Continue Reading

International

Gaza father outraged after Israeli strike kills son searching for water

Published

on

Gaza father outraged after Israeli strike kills son searching for water

Mahmoud Abdul Rahman Ahmed says his son, Abdullah, was “searching for a sip of water” when he took the family’s jerrycans on Sunday morning and headed as usual to one of the water distribution points in the urban Nuseirat camp, in central Gaza.

“That area was inhabited by displaced people, others who were exhausted by the war, and those who have seen the worst due to the imposed siege and limitations, and the ongoing aggression,” Mahmoud said in an interview with a local journalist working for the BBC.

“The children, Abdullah among them, stood in a queue with empty stomachs, empty jerrycans, and thirsty lips,” he added.

“Minutes after the children and thirsty people of the camp gathered, the warplanes bombed those children and the water distribution point, without prior notice.”

Graphic video filmed by another local journalist and verified by the BBC showed the immediate aftermath of the Israeli strike on a street in the New Camp area of Nuseirat.

He passes two men carrying young children before coming across a destroyed structure, beneath which dozens of yellow plastic jerrycans are clustered.

Women scream as bystanders pull a man from the rubble, while others try to help another man covered in blood. Other adults and children are seen lying motionless nearby.

Mahmoud called on the world to put pressure on Israel to end the 21-month war

Al-Awda hospital in Nuseirat said 10 people, including six children, were killed in the strike, and that 16 others were injured.

Along with Abdullah, they named the children who died as Badr al-Din Qaraman, Siraj Khaled Ibrahim, Ibrahim Ashraf Abu Urayban, Karam Ashraf al-Ghussein and Lana Ashraf al-Ghussein.

When asked about the strike, the Israeli military said it had targeted a Palestinian Islamic Jihad “terrorist” but that “as a result of a technical error with the munition, the munition fell dozens of meters from the target”.

READ ALSO:

The military said it was “aware of the claim regarding casualties in the area as a result” and “regrets any harm to uninvolved civilians”, adding: “The incident is under review.”

However, Mahmoud claimed that Israel “intended to convey a message: it won’t allow people to drink even the drinking water that they crave.”

He also lamented that dreams of Abdullah and the other children would never be realised.

“They were looking at reality with the hope of it changing, and of becoming like the other children of the world – practicing their normal role of playing, moving, traveling, eating, drinking, and living in safety,” he said.

The UN says water shortages in Gaza are worsening due to the lack of fuel and spare parts for desalination, pumping and sanitation facilities, as well as insecurity and inaccessibility due to Israeli military operations against Hamas and evacuation orders.

As a result, many people are receiving less than the emergency standard of 15 litres per day, amounting to what the UN calls “a human-made drought crisis”.

“You see children queuing up, by the side of the road, with yellow jerrycans every single morning, waiting for the daily water truck to come and get their five litres [or] 10 litres, of water used for washing, cleaning, cooking, drinking, etc,” Sam Rose, the acting Gaza director for the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (Unrwa), told the BBC.

“Every death is a tragedy. This one is particularly emblematic, given the circumstances in which it took place. But it’s one of many,” he added.

Last Thursday, 10 children and three women were killed as they waited for nutritional supplements outside a clinic in the nearby town of Deir al-Balah.

The Israeli military said it had targeted a Hamas “terrorist” nearby and, as with Sunday’s incident, that it regretted harming any civilians.

“We focus on these incidents, but of course these weren’t the only children killed in Gaza [on Sunday],” Rose said. “Every single day, since the start of the war, on average of classroom full of children have been killed.”

The executive director of the UN children’s agency (Unicef), Catherine Russell, meanwhile called both incidents “horrific” and demanded that Israeli authorities “urgently review the rules of engagement and ensure full compliance with international humanitarian law”.

Later this week, the UN Security Council will convene to discuss the situation of children in Gaza, following a request by the UK.

However, Israel’s permanent representative Danny Danon said council members would be “better served to apply pressure on Hamas for prolonging this conflict”.

“The children in Gaza are victims of Hamas, not Israel. Hamas is using them as human shields and the UN is silent,” he claimed.

Mahmoud said it was Israel which should be pressured to end the war.

“We have no power and no strength. We are victims. We are civilians just like other people in the world, and we don’t own any nuclear weapons or arms or anything,” he added.

“This war needs to stop, and so does the ongoing massacre happening in the Gaza Strip.”

Gaza father outraged after Israeli strike kills son searching for water

BBC

Continue Reading

International

US threatens Nigerians with permanent travel ban, deportation over visa overstay

Published

on

U.S President Donald Trump

US threatens Nigerians with permanent travel ban, deportation over visa overstay

The US has warned Nigerians about overstaying the authorised period granted in their visa, saying that such a violation will result in deportation and a probable permanent travel ban.

This was announced on Monday by the US Mission in Nigeria in a post on its X handle.

This comes after a series of travel restrictions and visa curbs affecting Nigerians, announced by the US recently as part of its ongoing immigration crackdown under President Donald Trump’s administration.

“If you remain in the United States beyond your authorised period of stay, you could be deported and could face a permanent ban on travelling to the United States in the future,” the US said in the post.

Early last week, the US announced a change to its visa reciprocity policy for Nigerians, limiting non-immigrant and non-diplomatic visas to three three-month single entries, citing reciprocity policy, visa overstay, national security, and incorrect documents as among the reasons.

It also established a new $250 required integrity cost for student, worker, and tourist visas.

In addition to the Visa Integrity Fee, the bill includes additional non-waivable travel-related surcharges.

READ ALSO:

There is a $24 I-94 cost and a $13 Electronic System for Travel Authorisation (ESTA) fee for Visa Waiver Program travellers.

According to the rule, the premium would apply to visa categories such as B-1/B-2 (tourist/business), F and M (students), H-1B (workers), and J (exchange visits).

Under the proposed rule, only diplomatic candidates in categories A and G would be exempt. The law provides explicitly that in fourteen cases.

The two visa restrictions were announced last week, after the United States required social media screening as part of the vetting process for candidates wishing to study in the country.

It required candidates to list all of their social network usernames and remove privacy settings in order to be properly screened.

The US Embassy in Nigeria stated in its announcement of the move, “Every visa adjudication is a national security decision. Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J non-immigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of their personal social media accounts to ‘public’ to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States.

Trump has implemented a rigorous immigration policy since taking office, requiring the expulsion of illegal immigrants from the United States.

Trump issued a slew of executive orders calling for an expanded and extremely stringent screening process during the visa-granting process to guarantee that those granted visas and permitted to enter the United States do not intend to harm citizens.

He also ordered continuing immigration screening and ensured that individuals already in the United States did not aid what he deemed foreign terrorist groups and did not harbour hatred towards the country.

US threatens Nigerians with permanent travel ban, deportation over visa overstay

Continue Reading

Trending