Woman drugs husband, burns house in scheme to gain more money – Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Woman drugs husband, burns house in scheme to gain more money

Published

on

Barbara Pasa

Woman drugs husband, burns house in scheme to gain more money

An Iowa nurse had one final act of desperation to keep her husband from divorcing her and to cash in on life and home insurance payouts: set her house on fire — killing her husband inside.

Barbara Pasa denied murdering her husband, Timothy, but was found guilty by a jury after only three hours of deliberation.

“I think Barb was in a bad place financially,” said police chief Tom Demry on Snapped, airing Sundays at 6/5c on Oxygen. “She wanted to appear to be the perfect family. Have the perfect home. The perfect cars. And I think it got to the point where she was not going to be able to uphold that appearance and that’s why she did what she did.”

Tim and Barb met at one of Tim’s country band concerts in 1999. The two were born and raised in the small town of Centerville, Iowa. They eventually had two children together.

“Barb and Tim seemed to have a great life, and she was so proud of her home,” said Sonja Carson, a former friend of Barb, on Snapped. “She always had pictures on Facebook. It seemed to be a well-rounded family.”

But appearances were deceiving. Two weeks before her husband’s death, Barb made an eerie threat while out with friends.

“She talked about a pending divorce,” Carson said. “She said that she hated him. She said it with a lot of emotion. And that if she wanted to get rid of someone, she knew she could.”

What happened to Tim Pasa?

Around 7:30 a.m. on Saturday, May 5, 2018, a neighbor spotted a fire at a home in Centerville, Iowa and called for help. When firefighters got the flames under control, they found the body of 50-year-old Tim Pasa on the bed in the master bedroom.

Firefighters noticed a few disturbing details in the home, including two smoke detectors that were disabled, and a candle on the floor of the bedroom.

“These were some things that stuck out to me as red flags because this is not normal stuff that you usually see,” Vern Milburn, Centerville fire rescue assistant chief, said on Snapped.

READ ALSO:

Neighbors had been unable to contact Tim’s wife, Barb. When they finally reached her, she said she’d been at her children’s soccer tournament. Police said she showed little emotion when she was told her husband was dead but asked to see his body in the ambulance outside their home.

“When she came out, we were waiting for her, and she was very stoic,” Carson said. “I just thought she was in shock. She didn’t show a lot of emotion and I was concerned that when she broke, it was going to be bad.”

Barb Pasa had an explanation for the disabled fire alarms.

“She said something had burned while she was in the process of baking and set off the smoke alarms,” Demry said. “And so, she asked Tim to take the batteries out of the smoke alarms until they could get the smoke cleared out of the room.”

She also explained that she’d lit a candle in the master bedroom area to cover up the smell of dog pee on the carpet.

When Barb was told there would be an autopsy on her husband’s body, police said she grew angry.

“I thought Barb’s reaction to that was not typical,” Michael Moore, Centerville police officer, said on Snapped. “I just felt that maybe she was being overwhelmed with everything that had gone on that morning.”

Barb Pasa explained that she and her children left the house just before 7 a.m. to head to a soccer tournament and had left Tim sleeping in bed. But police and firefighters found other red flags in Tim’s death, including that he had made no attempt to get off the bed or move during the fire.

“Even if a smoke alarm didn’t go off, the smoke, the heat, and the flames would have woken somebody up,” Demry said. “And there was no indication that that happened … why wouldn’t somebody wake up when there was a roaring fire right next to them?”

But the smoking gun that turned it from an accident investigation into a murder investigation: The medical examiner found no smoke inhalation in Tim’s lungs, meaning he was dead before the fire started.

How did Barb Pasa try to deal with her money troubles and impending divorce?

Friends agreed Barb Pasa was upset at the prospect of divorce.

“I think they stayed together for the kids  … and Barb, I think she did not want to have a marriage that ended in divorce,” Carson said. “In her eyes, she would have felt like she wouldn’t be accepted or that she wouldn’t be able to do things with us as couples.”

READ ALSO:

Finances were other source of tension in the family.

“Barb always wanted the kids to have the best of everything,” Carson said. “They drove nice cars, had the newest shoes — whatever they wanted. She also spent a lot of time shopping for herself … Spending money was one of her favorite things to do.”

But police learned the Pasa home was about to go into foreclosure when Tim died, and the couple was swimming in overdue credit card bills. Barb had also taken suspicious steps before Tim’s death.

“Barb had maxed out Tim’s life insurance from $50,000 to $200,000,” Moore said. “That had happened approximately five months prior to this incident. We were also able to determine she had increased the amount on the homeowner’s insurance for the residence.”

Although an initial toxicology report on Tim’s body didn’t show anything suspicious, when police considered Barb Pasa’s profession as a surgical nurse, that led toxicologists to test for an anesthetic called propofol, that’s commonly used to sedate patients before surgery. The drug was found in Tim’s blood.

“The injection of propofol is going to cause a person to sleep, and it can also affect the heart and lower blood pressure,” said Dr. Laura Labay, forensic toxicologist, on Snapped. “It can cause an individual to stop breathing, and a sufficient concentration can lead to death.”

Although Barb told police she had left the house by 7 a.m., an eyewitness proved that wasn’t true.

“As I was driving to work, I happened to notice that Barb’s vehicle was at home,” said Meghan Decena, a former co-worker of Barb, on Snapped. “I knew it was her vehicle based on the personalized plates that she had that spelled out ‘Pasa.’”

Decena used an app for work that tracked her whereabouts, and it put her by the Pasa house at 7:22 a.m.— well after Barb claimed to have left.

“Barb snapped because she didn’t want people to know the truth,” Moore said. “She didn’t want them to know that her life was not as it was portrayed.”

Barb Pasa testified in her own defense at her trial for murdering her husband.

“The tears that she was giving — all phony. The entire thing was phony,” said Rich Parker, a friend of Tim Pasa, on Snapped. “In my opinion, this woman is a psychopath. Lucky for us, she’s not a very smart psychopath. If she was as smart as she thought she was, Tim would have had smoke in his lungs. She didn’t think that part out.”

Barb was sentenced to life in prison plus 20 years. Her children now live with family and have no contact with their mother.

“These children lost a father and a mother both, and the kids will remember this forever and it’s just a very, very sad ordeal,” Milburn said.

Watch all-new episodes of Snapped on Sundays at 6/5c on Oxygen and the next day on Peacock.

Woman drugs husband, burns house in scheme to gain more money

International

Democrats drag Trump to court over election overhaul order

Published

on

U.S President Donald Trump

Democrats drag Trump to court over election overhaul order

The Democratic Party has sued the Trump administration over an attempt to impose sweeping changes on the election systems, including requiring citizenship proof to register to vote and limiting mail-in ballot counting.

In a lawsuit filed Monday, the Democratic Party asked a federal court to block the executive order, which prevents states from counting mail-in ballots that arrive after election day. The president’s directive also requires proof of citizenship to be presented — through documents such as a passport — when registering to vote.

“The President does not get to dictate the rules of our elections,” said the lawsuit filed in Washington by the Democratic National Committee, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and others.

“The Executive Order seeks to impose radical changes on how Americans register to vote, cast a ballot, and participate in our democracy—all of which threaten to disenfranchise lawful voters and none of which is legal,” it added.

After signing the March 25 order, called “Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections”, US President Donald Trump described it as “the farthest-reaching executive action taken” to secure US elections.

READ ALSO:

Trump, who does not acknowledge his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, has long questioned the integrity of the US electoral system. He has repeatedly and baselessly amplified conspiracy theories about massive election fraud in the United States, particularly involving absentee voting.

Legal scholars swiftly denounced Trump’s election order as an abuse of presidential power that could prevent millions of eligible voters from casting ballots.

Advocacy groups led by the Campaign Legal Center and State Democracy Defenders Fund filed a separate lawsuit on Monday against the same executive order.

“The president’s executive order is an unlawful action that threatens to uproot our tried-and-tested election systems and silence potentially millions of Americans,” Danielle Lang of the Campaign Legal Center said in a statement.

“It is simply not within the president’s authority to set election rules by executive decree, especially when they would restrict access to voting in this way.”

Democrats drag Trump to court over election overhaul order

AFP

Continue Reading

International

Iran warns US against attack, threatens with nuclear weapon

Published

on

Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei

Iran warns US against attack, threatens with nuclear weapon

Iran would have no alternative but to acquire a nuclear weapon if attacked by the United States or its allies, an adviser to the country’s supreme leader warned on Monday, following a threat by Donald Trump.

The comments came hours after the supreme leader himself, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had promised to hit back if the US president made good on his threat to bomb the Islamic republic if it did not agree to a deal to curb its nuclear programme.

“We are not moving towards (nuclear) weapons, but if you do something wrong in the Iranian nuclear issue, you will force Iran to move towards that because it has to defend itself,” Khamenei’s adviser Ali Larijani said in an interview with state TV.

“Iran does not want to do this, but… (it) will have no choice,” he added.

“If at some point you (the US) move towards bombing by yourself or through Israel, you will force Iran to make a different decision.”

In an interview on Saturday, Trump had said “there will be bombing” if Iran did not agree to a new nuclear deal, according to NBC News, which said he also threatened to punish Tehran with what he called “secondary tariffs”.

Trump’s language represented a sharpening of his rhetoric, though it was not clear whether he was threatening bombing by US planes alone or perhaps in an operation coordinated with another country, possibly Iran’s nemesis Israel.

“They threaten to do mischief,” Khamenei said of the remarks during a speech on Eid al-Fitr, the holiday marking the end of the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan.

READ ALSO:

“If it is carried out, they will definitely receive a strong counterattack.”

Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei, in a post on X, said the threat was “a shocking affront to the very essence of international peace and security”.

Baqaei warned of unspecified “consequences” should the United States choose a path of “violence”.

Western countries including the United States have long accused Iran of pursuing a nuclear weapon, which Tehran has denied, insisting its enrichment activities were solely for peaceful purposes.

The 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers required Iran to limit its nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief.

– ‘Indirect’ channel –

On March 7, Trump said he had written to Khamenei to call for nuclear negotiations and warn of possible military action if Tehran refused.

READ ALSO:

The letter was delivered to Tehran on March 12 by UAE presidential adviser Anwar Gargash, Iranian news agency Fars reported at the time.

On Thursday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the country had delivered a response via intermediary Oman, without detailing its content.

Araghchi said Iran would not engage in direct talks “under maximum pressure and the threat of military action”.

In his remarks, however, the minister left open the door for “indirect negotiations”.

According to NBC, Trump also said US and Iranian officials were “talking,” but he did not give details.

President Masoud Pezeshkian on Sunday said Khamenei, who as supreme leader has the final say in major state policies, had permitted indirect talks.

Oman has served as an intermediary in the past, in the absence of US-Iranian diplomatic relations severed after the 1979 Islamic revolution.

On Monday, Araghchi said the United States had received Iran’s letter.

“We have been informed by our friends in Oman that the letter has reached its destination and has been read.”

Beyond its nuclear programme, the West also accuses Iran of using proxy forces to expand its influence in the region, a charge Tehran rejects.

“There is only one proxy force in this region, and that is the corrupt usurper Zionist regime,” Khamenei said, calling for Israel to be “eradicated”.

Iran warns US against attack, threatens with nuclear weapon

Continue Reading

International

‘Bitcoin could replace U.S. Dollar as global currency’

Published

on

‘Bitcoin could replace U.S. Dollar as global currency’

BlackRock Chairman and CEO Larry Fink acknowledged in his 2025 annual letter that Bitcoin could challenge the U.S. dollar’s status as the global reserve currency.

“If the U.S. doesn’t get its debt under control, if deficits keep ballooning, America risks losing that position to digital assets like Bitcoin,” Fink wrote in BlackRock’s March 2025 letter.

The statement marks a significant shift from the head of the world’s largest asset manager, recognizing digital assets as potential alternatives to the dollar.

Throughout the letter, Fink mentioned Bitcoin seven times and the dollar eight times, signaling the growing relevance of digital currencies in financial discourse.

READ ALSO:

BlackRock’s letter frames Bitcoin as both an innovation and a risk, warning that if investors view it as a more stable long-term store of value than the dollar, it could undermine U.S. financial primacy.

Fink stressed that “two things can be true at the same time,” referring to both innovation and risk in digital asset development.

Beyond Bitcoin, Fink positioned tokenization as a transformative force for capital markets, likening it to the shift from postal mail to email.

He argued that tokenized assets could bypass financial intermediaries and democratize access to investments through fractional ownership and improved voting systems.

BlackRock also highlighted India’s digital identity system as a model for secure transactions, with over 90% of Indians verifying smartphone transactions—a benchmark for future tokenized economies.

‘Bitcoin could replace U.S. Dollar as global currency’

Continue Reading

Trending