N32bn debt: Innoson wants court to stop GTBank’s holdings structure bid - Newstrends
Connect with us

Business

N32bn debt: Innoson wants court to stop GTBank’s holdings structure bid

Published

on

Hearing will begin at the Federal High Court, Enugu, Monday (today) in an application filed by Innoson Nigeria Limited seeking to stop GTBank from transmuting into a financial holding company until the bank has paid a N32 billion judgment debt it obtained against it.

Innoson in a statement issued by its Head of Corporate Communications, Cornel Osigwe, said while awaiting GTBank Plc to come up with a payment plan for the over N32 billion judgement debt, the bank should suspend its proposed new structure.

Innoson is seeking the following order of perpetual injunctions:

(a) restraining the 4th Defendant (Corporate Affairs Commission) from deregistering the 1st Defendant (GTB) as a public limited liability company and or re-registering the 1st Defendant (GTB) as a private limited liability until it-GTB- pays the UC outstanding judgment debt of N32, 875, 204, 984.38k arising from Suit Nos: FHC/L/CS/603/2006 and No. FHC/AWK/CS/139/2012 respectively affirmed by the appellate courts in appeal Nos. CA/1/258/2011, SC.694/2014 and CA /E/288/2013 to Innoson Nig Ltd;

  1. An order of perpetual injunction restraining the 4th Defendant (Corporate Affairs Commission) from registering or re-registering the 1st Defendant (GTB) as a holding or financial holding company whether as a public or private limited liability company until it – the 1st Defendant(GTB) – pays Innoson Nigeria Ltd the outstanding total judgment debt of N32, 875, 204, 984.38k (Thirty two billion, eight hundred and seventy five million, two hundred and four thousand, nine hundred and eight four naira, thirty eight kobo) arising from suit Nos. FHC/L/CS/603/2006 and FHC/AWk/CS/139/2012 respectively affirm by the appellate courts in Appeal Nos. CA/1/258/2011, SC.694/2014 and CA/E/288/2013:
  2. An order cancelling the 1st Defendant’s (GTB’s) special  resolution and or any other of its resolution that it should be deregistered as a public limited liability company and or be re-registered as a private limited liability company and or a holding company until it -the 1st Defendant (GTB)- pays Innoson Nig Ltd the total outstanding judgment debt of  N32, 875, 204, 984.38k (Thirty two Billion, Eight Hundred and seventy Five Million, Two Hundred and four thousand, Nine Hundred and Eight Four Naira, Thirty Eight kobo) arising from suit Nos. FHC/L/CS/603/2006 and FHC/AWk/CS/139/2012 respectively affirmed by the appellate courts in Appeal Nos. CA/1/258/2011, SC.694/2014 and CA/E/288/2013:
  3. an order setting aside the 3rd Defendant’s (Security and Exchange Commission) No -objection to 1st Defendant’s proposal to be re-registered as a private limited liability company and as a holding or a holding financial company:
  4. An order setting aside the 2nd Defendant’s approval -in- principal granted to the 1st Defendant to operate as a holding or a holding financial company.
  5. An order of perpetual injunction restraining the 2nd Defendant from granting the 1st Defendant a financial holding company license and or a final approval to operate or carry on business as a financial holding company whether in its present name or as a private limited liability company until it, the 1st Defendant pays the Plaintiff the total outstanding judgement debt of N32, 875, 204, 984. 38k (Thirty Two Billion, Eight Hundred and Seventy-Five Million, Two Hundred and Four Thousand, Nine Hundred and Eighty-Four Naira, Thirty-Eight Kobo) arising from suit Nos. FHC/L/CS/603/2006 and FHC/AWK/CS/139/2012 respectively affirmed by the appellate courts in Appeal Nos. CA/1/258/2011, SC.694/2014, and CA/E/288/2013.

Osigwe in the statement explained that the Supreme Court of Nigeria had struck out GTB’s motion filed to set  aside its earlier decision/order made on 27th February 2019 dismissing GTB’s against Court of Appeal judgement of 6th February 2014  in favor of Innoson Nigeria Ltd

The statement added, “Recall that the Federal High Court, Awka Division on March 27th, 2019, pursuant to Supreme Court dismissing GTB’s appeal, granted leave to Innoson Nigeria Ltd to enforce and execute the judgment and Garnishee Order Absolute made by the court coram Shakarho, J at the Ibadan Judicial Division on the 18th of May 2010 and the 29th of July 2011 respectively. This order was concurrently affirmed by the Court of Appeal in the judgment of 6th February 2014 and by the Supreme Court in its judgment of 27th February 2019.

“As Innoson Nigeria Ltd commenced the tedious act of the execution, GTB rushed to the court vide its desperate motion on notice seeking orders staying or suspending the execution embarked by Innoson Nigeria Ltd and also seeking orders setting aside the exparte orders made by the court granting Innoson leave to enforce the judgment and to issue the processes of executing same.

“Whilst refusing GTB’s application and staying further proceedings the court further held that the order it made on March 27th, 2019 in favor of Innoson Nigeria Ltd granting it leave to enforce the judgment and issue processes of execution of the judgment are valid; also that all the steps taken to levy executions in pursuance of that order are still valid and are not vacated; whilst all the prayers by GTB in its motion of 1st April 2019 are not granted.

“GTB however rushed back to the Supreme Court and applied for an order setting aside the Supreme Court’s judgement dismissing its appeal against the above judgement. However, the Supreme Court struck out the motion on Tuesday, November 3rd, 2020.”

Loading

Business

NMDPRA Unveils Sweeping Draft Rules to Ban Fuel Price-Fixing, Artificial Scarcity

Published

on

NMDPRA Unveils Sweeping Draft Rules to Ban Fuel Price-Fixing, Artificial Scarcity

NMDPRA Unveils Sweeping Draft Rules to Ban Fuel Price-Fixing, Artificial Scarcity

The Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) has proposed comprehensive new regulations aimed at eliminating anti-competitive practices, including fuel price-fixing, market allocation, bid-rigging, and artificial scarcity, across the country’s midstream and downstream petroleum industry. The draft framework, released for public consultation on August 6, 2026, comes amid growing concerns over coordinated pricing among major fuel importers and follows allegations that some operators were selling imported Premium Motor Spirit at prices significantly above locally refined alternatives from the Dangote Petroleum Refinery.

The proposed Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Prevention of Anti-Competitive Practices and Behaviour Regulations, 2026, if adopted, would prohibit petroleum companies from entering into any formal or informal agreements that prevent, restrict, or distort competition. The NMDPRA, in a public notice issued on Thursday, invited licensees, permit holders, and other stakeholders to submit comments on the draft regulations within 21 days, in compliance with Section 216(1) of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) 2021, which requires stakeholder consultation before regulations are finalised. The notice, signed by the Authority’s Chief Executive, Rabiu A. Umar, directed industry participants to review the draft on the NMDPRA website and submit observations through the prescribed format. A stakeholders’ consultation forum has been scheduled for September 22, 2026, at the Authority’s headquarters in Abuja, where industry players, civil society organisations, and consumer groups will have the opportunity to provide direct input on the proposed framework.

The draft regulations target a wide range of coordinated conduct that could harm competition and disadvantage consumers. Under Part IV, titled “Collusive Agreements and Anti-Competitive Coordination,” the framework states that “No licensee, market participant, or group of undertakings in the midstream or downstream petroleum sector shall enter into any agreement, arrangement, understanding, or concerted practice, whether formal or informal, written or oral, explicit or tacit, that has the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition.” The regulations specifically identify price-fixing or coordinated pricing behaviour as prohibited, including agreements on pump prices, ex-depot prices, margins, discounts, surcharges, freight charges, and pricing benchmarks. If approved, petroleum companies would no longer be permitted to jointly set commercial terms that influence retail fuel prices, a practice that has historically kept pump prices artificially high even when global crude prices decline.

READ ALSO:

The proposed framework also seeks to outlaw market allocation arrangements, where competitors divide customers, geographical territories, product lines, or supply areas among themselves instead of competing openly for market share. Additionally, the regulations would prohibit bid-rigging and collusive tendering in procurement processes, as well as collective supply restrictions where companies jointly reduce production, imports, throughput, or product supply to create artificial scarcity or manipulate market conditions. Such practices have been a longstanding concern in Nigeria’s petroleum sector, where consumers have frequently faced fuel queues and sudden price hikes that appear disconnected from global market trends. The NMDPRA is also targeting tacit collusion and price signalling, including the use of public statements, trade association meetings, or indirect communications to influence competitors’ pricing decisions or exchange commercially sensitive information such as future pricing plans, production schedules, customer lists, and bidding strategies.

Beyond pricing and supply coordination, the regulations aim to prevent restrictive commercial arrangements that could limit market access for smaller operators and independent marketers. The draft proposes restrictions on exclusive supply agreements, excessively long-term contracts, and take-or-pay obligations that effectively lock buyers into a single supplier, thereby reducing their ability to source fuel from more competitive alternatives. The Authority also plans to scrutinise tying and bundling arrangements, where companies with significant market power require dealers or buyers to purchase unrelated products or services as a condition for accessing fuel supply or infrastructure services. These practices, according to the draft regulations, could stifle the growth of independent marketers and reduce consumer choice in the downstream market.

To strengthen enforcement, the regulations empower the NMDPRA to monitor press releases, investor calls, trade association meetings, and public statements by dominant market players for possible anti-competitive coordination. The Authority would also be authorised to investigate suspected anti-competitive practices and work alongside the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) on competition-related matters, ensuring a coordinated regulatory approach across Nigeria’s economic sectors. Under the proposed framework, companies found guilty of serious anti-competitive practices could face administrative fines of up to five per cent of their annual turnover from regulated petroleum activities in Nigeria, while persistent offenders risk suspension or revocation of their licences. Directors or managers directly involved in serious violations could face personal liability, management disqualification, or prosecution where applicable, signalling a tough stance on corporate misconduct.

The regulatory push comes amid renewed scrutiny of Nigeria’s downstream petroleum market following concerning developments in petrol pricing dynamics after the entry of the Dangote Petroleum Refinery. In July 2026, independent petroleum marketers accused major fuel importers, including AA Rano and Matrix, of selling imported petrol at coordinated prices around N1,350 per litre, significantly above what Dangote had been offering to marketers. The Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) argued that such practices defeated the purpose of import licences meant to encourage competition and moderate prices for Nigerian consumers. The allegations remain contested, and no regulatory finding of collusion has been published, but the incident has heightened public and official concern about the effectiveness of deregulation in delivering price benefits to consumers.

Official price data illustrate the pressure on regulators and the urgency of the proposed rules. National Bureau of Statistics figures show the average pump price surged from N1,034.76 per litre in January 2026 to N1,596.25 in May 2026, representing a 55.31 per cent rise over the same period in 2025. The NMDPRA has confirmed that the Dangote Petroleum Refinery accounted for 87.55 per cent of petrol supplied to the domestic market in May 2026, highlighting significant market concentration that could potentially enable dominant players to influence prices and supply conditions. The proposed regulations form part of broader reforms introduced under the Petroleum Industry Act 2021, which expanded the role of regulators in promoting efficiency, transparency, and fair competition across Nigeria’s petroleum value chain, moving away from the opaque and subsidy-dependent system that characterised the sector for decades.

If adopted after stakeholder consultations, the new rules will provide the NMDPRA with a dedicated legal framework to investigate and sanction anti-competitive conduct while supporting a more transparent, competitive, and consumer-focused petroleum market. The regulations would also strengthen Nigeria’s position in the regional energy market by fostering a more predictable and investment-friendly environment for domestic and foreign investors. The Authority has also signalled interest in improving price transparency across the region, saying it is exploring pathways for establishing an African petroleum products reference price benchmark that reflects regional market realities and protects consumers from arbitrary pricing. Stakeholders have until August 27, 2026, to submit their comments, and the September 22 consultation forum is expected to generate robust debate on how best to balance competition, investment, and consumer protection in Nigeria’s evolving petroleum sector.

NMDPRA Unveils Sweeping Draft Rules to Ban Fuel Price-Fixing, Artificial Scarcity

Loading

Continue Reading

Business

Petrol, Diesel Prices Drop as Dangote Cuts Ex-Depot Rates

Published

on

Why Imported Fuel Landing Cost Is Cheaper Than Dangote Gantry Price — Marketer

Petrol, Diesel Prices Drop as Dangote Cuts Ex-Depot Rates

 

Motorists and businesses may get some relief from fuel costs as Dangote Petroleum Refinery announced fresh reductions in the ex-depot prices of petrol and diesel, cutting the prices by N50 and N80 per litre respectively.

Under the new pricing regime, the refinery reduced the ex-depot price of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS), popularly known as petrol, from N1,215 to N1,165 per litre.

The price of Automotive Gas Oil (AGO), or diesel, was also reduced from N1,650 to N1,570 per litre.

The latest adjustment represents a 4.1 per cent reduction in the price of petrol and a 4.8 per cent cut in diesel.

The refinery said in a statement issued by the Dangote Group on Wednesday that the review was aimed at improving energy affordability, expanding access to locally refined petroleum products and supporting economic activities across the country.

The company said the new prices reflected its commitment to delivering affordable and quality petroleum products while maintaining a stable supply to the Nigerian market.

“Dangote Petroleum Refinery has announced a reduction in the ex-depot prices of Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) and Automotive Gas Oil (Diesel), reaffirming its commitment to providing affordable, high-quality petroleum products to the Nigerian market,” the statement said.

It added that the refinery would continue to leverage operational efficiencies and pass the resulting benefits to consumers whenever market conditions allowed.

The latest reduction comes less than two weeks after the refinery resumed naira-denominated petrol sales and raised its ex-depot price to N1,215 per litre following a brief shift to dollar-based transactions.

The earlier change had triggered concerns among petroleum marketers over rising downstream costs.

In July, the refinery had temporarily suspended petrol truck loading and introduced dollar-denominated sales, with petrol priced at $0.779 per litre under the new framework. It subsequently returned to naira transactions and fixed the ex-depot price at N1,215 per litre.

With the latest adjustment, the refinery has now reversed part of that increase, reducing the petrol price by N50 and diesel by N80.

However, the new figures are ex-depot prices and do not necessarily translate into an equivalent reduction in pump prices. The final price paid by motorists will depend on factors including transportation, depot charges, margins and other downstream costs.

Dangote said it remained committed to ensuring stable supplies while improving operational efficiency and supporting consumers, businesses and other stakeholders.

The refinery, which has a nameplate capacity of 650,000 barrels per day, has increasingly become a major source of locally refined petrol, diesel and other petroleum products as Nigeria seeks to reduce its dependence on imported refined fuels.

The company said its operations were contributing to Nigeria’s energy security by strengthening domestic refining capacity, reducing reliance on imports and supporting economic development.

It added that it would continue to pass on the benefits of improved operational efficiencies to consumers whenever market conditions permitted.

Loading

Continue Reading

Auto

High Power Bills Force BUK to Halt Electric Vehicle Charging on Campus

Published

on

High Power Bills Force BUK to Halt Electric Vehicle Charging on Campus

High Power Bills Force BUK to Halt Electric Vehicle Charging on Campus

Rising electricity costs have forced Bayero University, Kano, to ban the charging of privately owned electric motorcycles and other electric vehicles across its campuses.

The university said the growing practice of using its electricity supply to charge private electric vehicles had contributed significantly to a sharp increase in its power bills, creating an additional financial burden for the institution.

The directive, which takes immediate effect, was contained in a statement issued on Tuesday by the university’s Director of Public Affairs, Lamara Garba.

According to the statement, the management has observed the “indiscriminate charging” of privately owned electric motorcycles and other electric vehicles using the university’s electricity supply.

It said the development was no longer sustainable at a time when the institution was seeking to manage its resources prudently.

READ ALSO:

“The Management of Bayero University, Kano has observed with concern the indiscriminate charging of privately owned electric motorcycles and other electric vehicles using the University’s electricity supply across its campuses.

“This practice has contributed significantly to the sharp increase in the University’s electricity bills, thereby placing an enormous financial burden on the institution,” the statement said.

The university consequently directed all staff, students, commercial motorcycle operators and other users of electric motorcycles to stop charging their vehicles with the institution’s electricity.

It warned that anyone who violated the directive would face disciplinary action in accordance with the university’s rules and regulations.

“Management expects full compliance with this directive. Any person found violating this ban will be liable to appropriate disciplinary action,” the statement added.

To enforce the ban, the university directed provosts, deans, directors, heads of departments and heads of units to monitor compliance in their respective areas and report any violations to the appropriate authorities.

It also announced that a monitoring team would conduct regular patrols across the campuses to ensure strict adherence to the directive.

The institution urged all affected persons to cooperate with the measure, saying it was part of broader efforts to reduce energy costs and promote the prudent use of university resources.

 

High Power Bills Force BUK to Halt Electric Vehicle Charging on Campus

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending