Presidency Alleges PFIPC DG Forged Gbajabiamila’s Signature, Police Release Suspect’s Father

The Presidency has alleged that the self-acclaimed Director-General of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council, Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Mathew, forged the signature of the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, on a fake appointment letter, as the police released his father following public criticism over his arrest.

The Presidency said investigations by the police established that the appointment letter presented by Adeyemi, which purportedly originated from the Office of the Chief of Staff, contained a forged signature.

Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, maintained that neither Gbajabiamila nor the Presidency had any connection with the so-called Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council, describing it as a non-existent government agency.

According to the Presidency, Adeyemi allegedly forged official government documents and falsely presented himself as the Director-General of the purported council. It further alleged that he operated multiple bank accounts linked to fictitious government agencies in a bid to deceive members of the public.

Adeyemi is currently facing charges bordering on forgery, impersonation and conspiracy before the Federal High Court in Abuja.

Meanwhile, the police have released Adeyemi’s father after his arrest drew criticism from legal practitioners and rights advocates.

The arrest of the elderly man had sparked outrage, with senior lawyers arguing that Nigerian law does not permit the arrest or detention of a suspect’s relative solely to compel the suspect to surrender or cooperate with investigators, except where the relative is directly implicated in the alleged offence.

The release followed growing public concern over the legality of the action, although the police have yet to issue an official statement explaining the circumstances surrounding his arrest and subsequent release.

Presidency Alleges PFIPC DG Forged Gbajabiamila’s Signature, Police Release Suspect’s Father

Xenophobic attacks: Senate threatens review of diplomatic relations with South Africa

The Nigerian Senate has threatened to review the country’s diplomatic relations with South Africa over renewed xenophobic attacks targeting Nigerians, warning that Abuja may be forced to adopt tougher measures if the safety of its citizens is not guaranteed.

The upper legislative chamber also ordered a fresh investigation into the attacks and directed the Federal Government to seek firm assurances from the South African authorities on the protection of Nigerians living, working and doing business in the country.

The resolution followed a motion sponsored by Senator Asuquo Ekpeyong, who drew lawmakers’ attention to reports of a June 30, 2026 ultimatum allegedly issued to foreign nationals, including Nigerians, to leave parts of South Africa amid escalating anti-immigrant protests.

The Senate’s latest intervention comes amid renewed diplomatic tensions between Africa’s two largest economies following reports that two Nigerian citizens were recently killed during the latest wave of anti-migrant violence in South Africa. Nigeria’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has strongly condemned the killings, warning that all diplomatic options remain on the table if attacks on Nigerians continue.

During the debate, senators unanimously condemned the recurring attacks, describing them as unacceptable, inhumane and inconsistent with the principles of African unity.

Calls for tougher diplomatic action

Leading the debate, Senator Salihu Mustapha (Kwara Central) urged the Federal Government to abandon what he described as a passive diplomatic approach and adopt stronger measures against Pretoria.

“We cannot continue to fold our arms while Nigerians are being killed and their businesses looted,” Mustapha said.

READ ALSO:

• NELFUND, EFCC intensify probe into 34 institutions over alleged unpaid student refunds
• Nobody needs NYSC reform – Reuben Abati
• Deregistration: Court adjourns hearing on ADC, four other political parties’ appeal

“This is the starting point for a very robust engagement. I suggest we sever all diplomatic relationships with South Africa.”

However, former Senate Leader, Senator Yahaya Abdullahi, urged caution, arguing that the attacks should not automatically be interpreted as official South African government policy.

According to him, the violence could be linked to internal political efforts aimed at destabilising the South African government and weakening the governing African National Congress (ANC).

Recalling Nigeria’s historic support for South Africa during the anti-apartheid struggle, Abdullahi maintained that the situation required careful diplomatic handling.

“This is a coordinated effort to destabilise the government of South Africa and to remove the ruling party, the ANC, from office,” he said.

“There is an attempt from the right wing of White South Africans and now coming up from the Black ones to delegitimise the government as quickly as possible. We should tread with great caution and carefully consider this conspiracy.”

The senator also lamented what he described as inadequate funding of Nigeria’s foreign missions, saying the country’s embassies and high commissions have become too weak to effectively protect Nigerians abroad.

Senate demands written guarantees

Following extensive deliberations, the Senate adopted several far-reaching resolutions aimed at protecting Nigerians residing in South Africa.

Lawmakers directed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Nigerian High Commission in Pretoria, and other relevant agencies to obtain written guarantees from the South African government on the safety and security of Nigerians.

The Senate also insisted that all those responsible for attacks, killings, looting and destruction of property belonging to Nigerians must be arrested and prosecuted in accordance with South African law.

In addition, the lawmakers mandated the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NiDCOM) and the Nigerian High Commission in Pretoria to compile a comprehensive register of Nigerians affected by the attacks.

READ ALSO:

• Auto Tariff Reforms Must Not Undermine Nigeria’s Manufacturing Drive, NAMA Warns
• Tragedy in Benue as Woman Allegedly Sets Boyfriend’s Two Daughters Ablaze Over Suspected Infidelity

• Why Peter Obi cannot become Nigeria’s president in 2027 — Ali Modu Sheriff

The database is expected to include Nigerians who were killed, injured, displaced, unlawfully detained or whose businesses and properties were destroyed, with the aim of pursuing compensation and legal redress.

The demand for compensation comes despite the South African government’s recent rejection of calls to compensate Nigerians who abandoned their homes, businesses and properties while fleeing the violence.

South Africa’s Minister in the Presidency, Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, had argued that compensation could only apply to legally registered assets, insisting that structures in informal settlements do not qualify under the country’s property laws.

She also challenged the Nigerian government to cooperate in identifying criminal syndicates allegedly operated by some foreign nationals, including Nigerians, within South Africa.

Nigeria seeks continental response

Beyond bilateral engagement, the Senate urged the Federal Government to work with the African Union (AU) and other African countries to establish an early warning and accountability mechanism capable of preventing future xenophobic violence across the continent.

Lawmakers stressed that attacks on African migrants undermine regional integration, economic cooperation and the objectives of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).

The Senate further mandated its Committees on Foreign Affairs and Diaspora Affairs to review the implementation of its earlier resolution of May 5, 2026, on xenophobic attacks and examine existing bilateral agreements between Nigeria and South Africa.

Both committees were directed to submit their findings within two legislative weeks.

Tension briefly rose during the debate when Senator Abdul Ningi proposed that President Bola Tinubu should begin the process of severing diplomatic ties with South Africa should the attacks continue.

Similarly, Senator Adams Oshiomhole suggested that profits generated by South African-owned companies operating in Nigeria should be appropriated to compensate Nigerian victims of xenophobic violence.

Deputy President of the Senate Jibrin Barau, who presided over the session, urged restraint, insisting that the Senate should first await the outcome of the committees’ investigation before considering stronger diplomatic or economic sanctions.

The latest Senate action follows growing concern over anti-immigrant protests that have swept parts of South Africa in recent months. Although South African authorities insist many demonstrations have been peaceful, several incidents have turned violent, with foreign nationals reportedly attacked and foreign-owned businesses looted. South Africa has called on Nigeria to submit evidence through diplomatic channels while investigations continue into the reported death of one Nigerian during police interrogation.

Xenophobic attacks: Senate threatens review of diplomatic relations with South Africa

Tinubu orders probe of Google, Meta, X, AI platforms over alleged exploitation of Nigerian news content

President Bola Tinubu has directed the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) to investigate Google, Meta, X (formerly Twitter) and several Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) platforms over allegations of anti-competitive practices and the unlawful exploitation of content produced by Nigerian media organisations.

The directive followed a joint petition submitted to the Presidency by the Nigerian Press Organisation (NPO)—the umbrella body representing the Newspaper Proprietors’ Association of Nigeria (NPAN), the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), the Broadcasting Organisations of Nigeria (BON) and the Guild of Corporate Online Publishers (GOCOP).

The petition accuses major global technology companies and AI platforms of using news content created by Nigerian publishers without fair compensation, a practice media stakeholders say threatens the financial sustainability of journalism and undermines the country’s news ecosystem.

The directive was conveyed to the FCCPC through the Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, signalling what could become one of Nigeria’s most significant regulatory actions involving global technology companies and artificial intelligence platforms.

In a statement issued on Monday, the Director of Corporate Affairs at the FCCPC, Ondaje Ijagwu, confirmed that the investigation would examine allegations against Meta, Alphabet, the parent company of Google, X, formerly known as Twitter, and selected Generative AI platforms operating within Nigeria.

According to the commission, the probe will focus on claims of anti-competitive conduct, unfair market practices, unlawful exploitation of news content and other activities that may violate Nigeria’s competition and consumer protection laws.

READ ALSO:

• Police Arraign Visa Agent Over Alleged N7.6 Million Fraud in Ibadan
• Dr. Dayo Mobereola at NIMASA: Over two years of Reform, Stability, and the Road Ahead
• Sokoto: 2023 PDP governorship candidate defects to APC

“Big technology companies have come under the radar of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission following allegations of anti-competitive practices, unlawful exploitation of news content, and other potentially unfair market conduct,” the commission stated.

It added that the investigation followed President Tinubu’s directive after the Presidency received the petition from the Nigerian Press Organisation.

The FCCPC said Nigerian media organisations have expressed growing concern that some digital platforms have built highly profitable businesses by distributing, aggregating and monetising journalistic content without entering into meaningful commercial agreements with the publishers responsible for producing that content.

According to the commission, the investigation will also examine allegations that some Generative AI platforms have unlawfully extracted, scraped, ingested and commercially utilised copyrighted news articles, broadcast materials, photographs and other original journalistic works to train artificial intelligence models without the consent of publishers.

Another key issue before the commission is whether Nigerian publishers have been denied fair opportunities to negotiate licensing agreements and appropriate compensation for the commercial use of their intellectual property.

The Executive Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the FCCPC, Tunji Bello, assured all parties that the inquiry would be transparent, evidence-based and conducted in accordance with the law.

“We recognise the strategic importance of the media to Nigeria’s democracy and the equally significant role of technology in driving innovation and economic growth. Our responsibility is to objectively determine the facts and ensure that competition within the digital ecosystem remains fair, transparent, and consistent with Nigerian law,” Bello said.

He stressed that the investigation should not be interpreted as a finding of wrongdoing against any company.

According to him, every organisation involved will have the opportunity to present evidence before the commission reaches any conclusions.

“This inquiry is not directed at any entity by presumption of wrongdoing. Rather, it is an opportunity to carefully examine the facts, hear from all affected parties, and determine whether any conduct has resulted in anti-competitive outcomes or unfair business practices.”

The commission said the investigation will determine whether the practices complained of violate the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2018, or any other applicable Nigerian law.

Among the issues under review are allegations of market dominance, anti-competitive behaviour and the commercial exploitation of copyrighted journalistic content without authorisation or compensation.

The investigation comes at a time when governments around the world are increasingly scrutinising the relationship between digital platforms and news publishers.

Countries including Australia, Canada, France and South Africa have introduced or strengthened regulatory measures requiring technology companies to negotiate compensation agreements with media organisations whose content drives user engagement on their platforms.

In South Africa, negotiations facilitated by the country’s Competition Commission resulted in Google agreeing to provide approximately R688 million (about $40 million) annually for between three and five years to support local news publishers.

Nigeria’s investigation is expected to examine whether similar concerns exist within the country’s digital media market and whether regulatory intervention is necessary to promote fair competition and protect the long-term sustainability of journalism.

The latest probe also follows the FCCPC‘s earlier enforcement action against Meta, which resulted in a $220 million administrative penalty over alleged violations of Nigeria’s competition and consumer protection laws, including issues relating to consumer rights and data privacy. The company has appealed the decision.

Industry observers believe the outcome of the investigation could reshape the relationship between global technology companies, artificial intelligence developers and Nigerian media organisations by establishing clearer rules on content licensing, digital competition and fair compensation for publishers.

If the allegations are substantiated, the findings could influence future regulation of digital platforms, AI-generated content and the broader digital economy, while reinforcing the protection of intellectual property rights within Nigeria’s media industry.

Tinubu orders probe of Google, Meta, X, AI platforms over alleged exploitation of Nigerian news content