APC dares INEC, says March 26 convention will hold - Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

APC dares INEC, says March 26 convention will hold

Published

on

The ruling All Progressives Congress, APC, may dare the Independent National Electoral Commission, as it has vowed to proceed with its March 26 National Convention.

The party has dismissed a letter written to it by INEC on the need to give the commission a fresh 21-day notice for its national convention slated for March 26.

It faulted INEC’s position that the letter by the acting Chairman Caretaker Extraordinary Convention Planning Committee, CECPC, Governor Abubakar Sani Bello, is legally defective.

The party also clarified that Yobe State Governor, Mai Mala Buni, remained the National Chairman of the CECPC, saying the Niger State Governor, Abubakar Sani Bello, is only operating in an acting capacity.

The spokesman for the party’s CECPC, Mr Ismaila Ahmed, disclosed this at a news conference in Abuja, on Friday.

He said, “It is pretty simple. I don’t know why this is a complicated issue for a lot of people to understand. Since the inception of this CECPC on June 25 2020, whenever the chairman is not around and Governor Sani Bello is around, he acts on behalf of the chairman.

“He is our acting chairman and that has always been the case. That has never changed. And now we have a Convention on 26th March, the Chairman wrote a letter for his leave to go for medical treatment. Those are two emergencies. He has a medical emergency that cannot wait for the Convention and we have a Convention that cannot wait for him to be healthy. So, one has to leave for the other.

“The chairman transmitted a letter and Governor Bello has been acting as appropriate. He is acting with the full authority of the CECPC and with the full authority of the stakeholders and leaders of the party and with the full consent and knowledge of Governor Mai Mala Buni. If anybody has any issues with any of our decisions, you can take it to court. For now, we know we are doing it with the full backing of the law. There is no ambiguity in this.”

According to him, the APC has given appropriate notice to INEC for its March 26 national convention.

He said the party had earlier intimated the commission of its intent to conduct its national convention on February 26 and that what is now required for its new date of March 26 is simply a notice of an adjustment and not a fresh 21-day notice.

“I am not only a youth leader or an interim Spokesperson for the party, I am also a lawyer and we have served a notice to INEC for the 26th of February earlier and we served that notice on 5th February. That was the required 21 days. If you are going to make any adjustment to that date, all you need is a letter making an adjustment to the date.

“We don’t need another 21 days and that letter was written about two weeks ago. Immediately we realized that we couldn’t hold it on the 26th of February.

“The moment the CECPC agreed on the 26th March, that letter was written to INEC and they have accepted the letter. So, that is long gone. It is not an issue. The issue of the date of the Convention is not an issue, not in INEC, not certainly with us. That is settled. It is sacrosanct. We have complied with all the requirements and we have notified INEC as appropriately expected of us.”

Buni had visited President Muhammadu Buhari, in London, to tell his side of the story on happenings in the APC and to hear directly from the head of state on his status in the CECPC.

He reportedly went to London from his sick bed in Dubai.

INEC had in a letter dated March 9, 2022 and signed by its Secretary, Rose Oriaran-Anthony, drew the attention of the APC to the need to comply with extant regulations.

The letter read, “Please refer to your letter Ref. APC/NHDQ/INEC/019/022/32, dated 8th March 2022.

“The Commission draws your attention to the fact that the notice for the meeting was not signed by the National Chairman and National Secretary of the CECPC (Buni and Akpanudoedehe) contrary to the provision of the Article 1.1.3 of the Commission’s Regulations and Guidelines for Political Party Operations (2018).

“Furthermore, the APC is reminded of the provision in Section 82(1) of the Electoral Act 2022 which requires ‘at least 21 days’ notice of any convention, congress, conference, or meeting convened for the purpose of ‘merger’ and electing members of its executive committees, other governing bodies or nominating candidates for any elective offices.’

“While hoping these issues are noted for compliance, please accept the assurance of the Commission’s warm regards.”

On the National Executive Committee meeting slated for next Thursday, the party said it would ratify the March 26 Convention date and update the house on the journey so far.

Ismaila Ahmed said the party’s Legal Adviser, Prof. Tahir Mamman, would address the public once some issues regarding the NEC meeting are clarified, adding that notices had been sent out for the NEC meeting.

The CECPC has excluded its National Secretary, Senator John James Akpanudoedehe, from the list of members saddled with fresh responsibilities.

Ahmed said, “I was tasked with the responsibility for Media and Publicity; Prof. Tahir Mamman will be overseeing the Legal Department; Hon. Stella Okotete and Senator Yusuf Abubakar Yusuf will be overseeing the Organizing Department, and then Dr James Lalu and Chief David Lyon will oversee the Finance Department; and former Senate President, Ken Nnamani and Senator Abba Ali will be overseeing the Policy, Strategy and Research Department.”

Meanwhile, immediate past Director-General of the Progressive Governors’ Forum, Salihu Lukman, has asked the party to probe some governors who he accused of working with Governor Buni to frustrate the party from holding its national convention.

He said, “There are known collaborators of His Excellency Mai Mala who have colluded with him to ensure that all attempts to organise the APC National Convention are blocked.

“Three governors who are known and must also be called upon to account for their roles in undermining decisions to organise the APC National Convention are His Excellency Yahaya Bello of Kogi State, His Excellency Hope Uzodimma of Imo State and His Excellency Dapo Abiodun of Ogun State.

“There are other party leaders, including Senator Uzo Kalu who have actively supported His Excellency Mai Mala to undermine the decision to organise the National Convention of the party. March 17, 2022, APC NEC should initiate processes of a disciplinary hearing in line with provisions of the APC Constitution to sanction all these leaders, if found guilty.”

 

 

Loading

Politics

BREAKING: Atiku Picks Amaechi As Running Mate For 2027 Presidential Election

Published

on

What I Discussed With Amaechi During Abuja Visit — Atiku

BREAKING: Atiku Picks Amaechi As Running Mate For 2027 Presidential Election

ABUJA — The presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, has reportedly selected former Minister of Transportation and ex-Governor of Rivers State, Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi, as his running mate for the 2027 presidential election.

The development, which marks a significant step in the ADC’s preparations for the general election, was confirmed on Saturday by prominent party figures, including the immediate past Chairman of the ADC in Rivers State, Leader Sampson.

When asked whether Amaechi had accepted the vice-presidential nomination, Sampson responded in the affirmative, signaling the successful conclusion of weeks of consultations and negotiations within the opposition coalition.

The emergence of an Atiku-Amaechi ticket comes shortly after a fiercely contested ADC presidential primary election that attracted more than 2.5 million votes from the party’s estimated 3.1 million registered members nationwide.

Atiku secured a decisive victory in the exercise, polling 1,855,787 votes to defeat Amaechi, who garnered 509,397 votes, while businessman and economist Mohammed Hayatu-Deen came third with 180,903 votes.

The primary election, however, was not without controversy. Following the announcement of the results, both Amaechi and Hayatu-Deen expressed reservations about the conduct of the exercise, alleging irregularities and claiming that the process had been skewed in favour of Atiku.

READ ALSO:

Prior to the primary, Amaechi had repeatedly maintained that he did not obtain the party’s expression of interest and nomination forms to pursue a vice-presidential position, insisting that his ambition was to contest for the presidency.

Political observers had therefore viewed the possibility of an Atiku-Amaechi ticket as unlikely, particularly in light of the disagreements that followed the primary election.

However, a major breakthrough reportedly occurred after Atiku embarked on a reconciliation mission to Amaechi’s residence shortly after the contest. Sources within the party disclosed that the meeting was aimed at healing divisions and strengthening party unity ahead of the 2027 election.

The reconciliation effort was later followed by another high-level meeting involving Atiku, Amaechi, Hayatu-Deen and senior ADC leaders at the Transcorp Hilton Hotel in Abuja.

During the discussions, Atiku was said to have appealed to his former rivals to set aside their differences and work together in building a formidable opposition platform capable of challenging the ruling party and advancing democratic governance in Nigeria.

According to sources familiar with the meeting, Atiku emphasized that the presidential primary should not be viewed as a battle between winners and losers but rather as a collective democratic process designed to strengthen the party.

The reported acceptance of the vice-presidential nomination by Amaechi is being interpreted by political analysts as a strategic move by the ADC to consolidate support across key regions of the country.

Atiku, a prominent political figure from Nigeria’s North-East, and Amaechi, a leading politician from the South-South, are expected to present a ticket that party leaders believe will enhance the ADC’s national appeal and electoral competitiveness.

The development is also seen as a major boost to opposition efforts ahead of the 2027 presidential election, with stakeholders expressing optimism that the reconciliation between the party’s leading figures will strengthen internal cohesion.

Party officials are expected to make a formal announcement on the Atiku-Amaechi ticket in the coming days.

If officially confirmed, the ticket will set the stage for one of the most closely watched presidential contests in Nigeria’s recent political history.

BREAKING: Atiku Picks Amaechi As Running Mate For 2027 Presidential Election

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

No Election Is Perfect Anywhere – Fashola Tells Opposition to Accept Results

Published

on

No Election Is Perfect Anywhere – Fashola Tells Opposition to Accept Results
Former Lagos State Governor and ex-Minister of Works, Housing and Power, Babatunde Fashola

No Election Is Perfect Anywhere – Fashola Tells Opposition to Accept Results

LAGOS – Former Lagos State Governor and ex-Minister of Works, Housing and Power, Babatunde Fashola, has declared that elections are inherently imperfect exercises, urging Nigerian opposition politicians to stop faulting outcomes and instead accept results while embracing their democratic role.

Speaking on Friday at The Platform, a public policy forum organised by the Covenant Christian Centre and led by Pastor Poju Oyemade as part of activities marking Democracy Day, Fashola laid bare the logistical scale of Nigerian elections to explain why absolute perfection remains unattainable.

According to the former minister, Nigeria conducts presidential elections across more than 176,000 polling units simultaneously, with officials and voters expected to perform identical tasks under vastly different conditions. This reality, he argued, makes flawless elections a practical impossibility anywhere in the world.

Elections are an imperfect event because they require a large logistical operation across a federation,” Fashola told the audience.

He then challenged his listeners directly, posing a fundamental question about democratic conduct: “Do we agree as a people that elections are an imperfect event all over the world? They are never perfect because it is a large and challenging logistic undertaking. So, perfection is aspirational.”

Explaining the inherent difficulties of nationwide polls, Fashola noted that the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) cannot be present at every polling unit to supervise or verify procedures. He asked pointedly: “And so, with imperfections, are we agreed that we should accept the results? Or are we agreed that it must be INEC’s fault? Even when the INEC chairman cannot be in all of those 176,000 polling stations.”

READ ALSO:

The former governor argued that electoral imperfections are not unique to Nigeria. He noted that even long-established democracies acknowledge such challenges while continually seeking ways to improve their electoral systems rather than undermining public confidence in democratic outcomes.

“In other jurisdictions, they recognise the imperfections, they aspire to improve, but they accept the results. They move peacefully and calmly to take up the position of opposition,” Fashola stated.

He expressed concern over what he described as a growing reluctance among some political actors to accept electoral defeat, warning that such attitudes weaken democratic development and prevent unsuccessful candidates and parties from playing constructive opposition roles.

“It seems to me that an unwillingness to accept the outcome of an election perhaps blinds the unsuccessful participants from seeking and taking up the role of opposition for the development of society,” he said.

Fashola emphasised that opposition politics plays a critical role in democratic governance and should not be viewed solely through the lens of electoral victory or defeat. He declared that “the role of opposition is as important, if not more important, than the role of those in government.”

Reflecting on the significance of June 12 as Democracy Day, Fashola recalled the annulment of the June 12, 1993 presidential election, describing it as a turning point in Nigeria’s democratic journey.

“This should have been an ordinary day, just another ordinary day. We had gone to vote and we had expected while we were monitoring the results that the votes would be counted. Then the abnormal happened. The votes were stopped, the elections were subsequently annulled and June 12 became not just a date anymore, it became an event, a cause and a movement, an agitation that took local, international and global centre stage,” he said.

The former minister stressed that democracy extends far beyond the conduct of elections. He urged citizens and political leaders to engage in deeper conversations about the kind of democratic culture Nigeria seeks to build.

“If we are to discuss democracy beyond elections, the question I ask is: What kind of democracy do we want? ” he asked.

Fashola also called for national consensus on critical governance issues such as taxation, foreign policy, parliamentary oversight, healthcare, education funding, labour relations and political party accountability. On taxation, he questioned whether political parties had clearly articulated their positions during recent debates on fiscal reforms.

“Can you truly have a representative government, a democratic government, without a debate about taxation? That is the basis of representation,” he said.

Addressing the broader function of consensus in democracy, Fashola noted that agreement across party lines does not weaken opposition politics. “Consensus does not disable opposition. On the contrary, it sharpens the alternative that they represent,” he stated.

The former minister further challenged Nigerians to reflect on the country’s identity, asking whether Nigeria should be regarded primarily as a nation or merely a country. “Are we a nation or are we a country? We use those words somewhat interchangeably, but they mean different things,” he said.

In a separate disclosure during a panel discussion at the same event, Fashola revealed that he did not receive security votes at any point during his eight years as governor of Lagos State. He explained that all funds belonging to the state government during his administration were managed through established institutional channels rather than being placed under the direct control of the governor, with revenues domiciled within the state’s Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning.

Fashola maintained that while elections remain a vital component of democracy, the true test of democratic maturity lies in the ability of institutions, political actors and citizens to uphold democratic values even after the ballots have been counted.

His remarks formed part of broader discussions at The Platform on the state of Nigeria’s democracy, governance, accountability and the responsibilities of citizens and political leaders in sustaining democratic institutions. The event was held at the Covenant Christian Centre in Lagos as part of activities marking the June 12, 2026 Democracy Day celebration.

No Election Is Perfect Anywhere – Fashola Tells Opposition to Accept Results

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

Aisha Yesufu Slams Dickson Over Comments on Peter Obi, NDC Leadership

Published

on

Aisha Yesufu Slams Dickson Over Comments on Peter Obi, NDC Leadership

Aisha Yesufu Slams Dickson Over Comments on Peter Obi, NDC Leadership

Popular activist and member of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Aisha Yesufu, has criticised the party’s national leader, Senator Seriake Dickson, accusing him of displaying political insecurity and behaving as though he was in competition with the party’s presidential candidate, Peter Obi.

Yesufu made the remarks in a post on X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday, reacting to Dickson’s interview on ARISE News, where he defended the NDC leadership and responded to criticism that followed the party’s recent primaries.

She said parts of the interview were “painfully appalling,” arguing that Dickson missed an opportunity to unite the party and reassure members ahead of the 2027 general elections.

According to her, the interview should have focused on strengthening the party and promoting its candidates rather than highlighting internal disagreements.

“This part of the interview was so painfully appalling to watch. It looked as if you were insecure and in competition with your presidential candidate,” she wrote.

Yesufu argued that as a party leader, Dickson’s primary responsibility should be to calm tensions and build confidence among members, especially after a heated primary process.

READ ALSO:

She added that his comments instead risked deepening divisions and sending the wrong message to supporters and aspirants.

The activist also rejected Dickson’s suggestion that some party members may have violated internal rules due to their popularity, insisting she followed due process during the primaries.

She maintained that she complied with party guidelines, even when uncertainty surrounded the conduct of certain primaries, including Senate contests, which she said were later addressed through internal adjustments.

Yesufu further disclosed that she had engaged supporters in parts of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) to ease tensions after disagreements over the primaries.

She accused Dickson of treating the NDC as a platform that had already achieved its purpose upon registration, rather than a political movement focused on winning elections.

“With all due respect, sir, it looks as if you consider the NDC a special purpose vehicle whose aim has been achieved just by being registered instead of a political party whose aim is to win the 2027 general election decisively,” she said.

Yesufu stressed that political leadership requires humility and the ability to manage grievances, noting that unity remains critical for electoral success.

She said leaders must prioritise persuasion and reconciliation, especially in moments of internal disagreement, warning that alienating supporters could weaken the party’s chances in 2027.

“As a leader of a political party, your number one job… was to pacify aspirants… but you ended up antagonising the very people you would need to win an election. Every vote counts!” she said.

Yesufu also emphasised that the focus of political actors should remain on addressing Nigeria’s challenges rather than internal ego battles.

“There is a whole battle ahead of us. Rescuing Nigeria from the current state it is in should be the main focus, not people’s fragile ego,” she added.

Meanwhile, Dickson had earlier defended the NDC leadership, insisting the party remained united despite disagreements that emerged after the primaries and dismissing what he described as counterproductive attacks from some Obi supporters.

Aisha Yesufu Slams Dickson Over Comments on Peter Obi, NDC Leadership

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending