Osun tribunal: INEC admits over-voting in governorship poll - Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

Osun tribunal: INEC admits over-voting in governorship poll

Published

on

Adegboyega Oyetola and Senator Ademola Adeleke

Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has admitted that there was over-voting in the July 16 governorship election that brought in Ademola AdelekeĀ as governor of Osun State.

A Deputy Director in the ICT department of INEC, Mrs. Abimbola Oladunjoye, disclosed this while giving evidence before the Election Petition Tribunal hearing the petition filed by Mr. Adegboyega Oyetola and the All Progressives Congress (APC), against the declaration of Adeleke as the winner of the election.

Cross-examined by the petitioners’ counsel, Chief Akin Olujinmi SAN, Oladunjoye, who was referred to as a star witness of INEC, admitted that in Ward 4 unit 7, Ede South Local Government, there was an over-voting of 75, as the figure of accreditation on the BVAS report presented by INEC was 313, while the result on form EC8A was 383.

Oladunjoye’s attention was also drawn to paragraph 21.36 of his witness statement where she said the accreditation figure was 830, but in the BVAS report presented by INEC, the figure of accreditation was 793, admitting that there was an over-voting of 37.
The witness also admitted that in paragraph 26.7 of his witness statement, there was an accreditation figure of 402, while the accreditation figure on the INEC BVAS report was 263, admitting that there was an over-voting of 139.
READ ALSO:

Also in paragraph 23.24 of his witness statement, Oladunjoye agreed that the accreditation figure she mentioned was 448, while the accreditation figure on BVAS was 224, admitting that there was an over-voting of 224.

The witness, who said under cross examination that she was not a presiding officer on the election day, added that it was only the presiding officers that had explanation on what transpired at the polling units on the election day.

The INEC representative, who admitted that she signed and certified a BVAS report for the petitioners, further said the copy of the report was different from the one issued to the respondents, adding that she never indicated that the report issued to the petitioners was an interim document, which would be subjected to synchronisation.

She testified that the synchronisation was done after election result had been declared on July 17, and BVAS report was issued to the petitioners on July 27.

After the cross examination of the witness, Chief Olujinmi hinted that the irregularities identified in the BVAS report presented by INEC was just a tip of an iceberg, saying there were loads of over-voting during the election.

The tribunal had admitted as exhibits the load of BVAS machines and CTC of Form EC8 series brought to the tribunal by the INEC counsel.

After the cross examination of the witness, the INEC counsel, Prof. Ananaba, told the court that he would no longer be calling any other witness, as he applied to close his case.

Counsel for Adeleke, Onyeachi Ikpeazu, subsequently opened his defence by tendering form EC8 series used for the election.

However, the tribunal raised issue as to the safe custody of the BVAS machine tendered and admitted in evidence, as the panel ordered that the machines should be kept at the Central Bank vault in Osogbo.

The tribunal adjourned till tomorrow (today).

The Nation

Loading

Politics

Presidency Slams Peter Obi’s ā€˜False Intimidation Claims’

Published

on

Presidency Slams Peter Obi’s ā€˜False Intimidation Claims’

Presidency Slams Peter Obi’s ā€˜False Intimidation Claims’ 

Presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga labels Obi a ā€œpathological and serial liarā€ over allegations of government persecution and safety threats ahead of the 2027 elections.

The Presidency has strongly dismissed allegations byĀ Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) presidential candidate Peter ObiĀ that he is being targeted by the Federal Government, describing the claims as false and an attempt to portray himself as a victim. In a statement titledĀ ā€œPeter Obi’s New Lies,ā€Ā the Presidency said Obi’s recent comments allegingĀ intimidation by the governmentĀ were unfounded and designed to attract public sympathy ahead of theĀ 2027 presidential election.

Mr Obi had claimed in an interview on theĀ With ChudeĀ podcast that he faces systematic harassment and may not be alive to contest the 2027 election. He cited specific incidents to support his claims, including an airport incident where he alleged that officials locked his vehicle while other cars parked in the same area were left untouched, and officials dismissed his complaint. He also claimed that associates avoid greeting him publicly for fear of becoming government targets, and that some families have invited him to events only to ask him not to attend. Additionally, Obi stated that the government is deliberately frustrating his daily activities, adding, ā€œEvery single thing I do for a living, this government is frustrating it. Deliberately so.ā€

READ ALSO:

Reacting to these allegations, Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy,Ā Bayo Onanuga, rejected the claims, insisting that theĀ Tinubu administrationĀ had neither the time nor the inclination to persecute the former Anambra State governor. Onanuga argued that the airport issue resulted from Obi flouting parking regulations, not from any government action, stating that ā€œPeter Obi’s recent claims of being targeted by the government—citing an incident involving his car at the airport, which, by his own account, must have resulted from flouting parking regulations—are simply unfounded and misleading.ā€

The presidential spokesman went further, dismissing Obi’s claims as a fabricated narrative and using strong language to describe the NDC candidate. He called Obi a ā€œpathological and serial liarā€ who is intent on dragging the government into every personal inconvenience he encounters, often resorting to exaggeration and baseless allegations. Onanuga also addressed Obi’s claim that he may not be alive for the January 2027 election and that people are being pressured not to invite him to social events, describing this as ā€œnothing more than a fabricated narrative, a page from his book of lies and propaganda.ā€

The Presidency also rejected suggestions that the government was targetingĀ Fidelity BankĀ due to Obi’s reported interests in the financial institution. According to the statement, the bank ā€œcontinues to thrive under the current administration’s economic reforms,ā€ adding that there was no basis for claims that it was under any form of government persecution. ā€œRather than being ā€˜haunted’ by the government, Mr Obi appears to be grappling with the consequences of his litany of unfounded statements,ā€ the statement said.

The Presidency maintained thatĀ President Bola Tinubu’s administrationĀ remained focused on implementing economic reforms and improving the welfare of Nigerians. It added that the government would not be distracted by what it described as Obi’s ā€œself-serving narrativesā€ and insisted that the administration’s priority remained consolidating reforms for national development.

Presidency Slams Peter Obi’s ā€˜False Intimidation Claims’ 

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

I may not be alive to contest, Peter Obi alleges systematic persecution

Published

on

Presidency Slams Peter Obi’s ā€˜False Intimidation Claims’

I may not be alive to contest, Peter Obi alleges systematic persecution

 

Former Peter Obi has expressed fears for his safety ahead of the 2027 general elections, saying he may not live long enough to contest the presidential race as he accused the government of systematically frustrating his businesses and targeting opposition figures.

Obi made the remarks during an interview on With Chude, hosted by media personality Chude Jideonwo, excerpts of which were shared on X on Wednesday.

Asked whether he would definitely be on the ballot in 2027, the former Anambra State governor responded that his participation was far from certain.

“Not even a candidate. I might not even be alive. I’m telling you. Every single thing I do for a living, this government is frustrating it. Deliberately so. Everything. So, there is even a possibility, if they have the opportunity, I will not be alive,” he said.

Although Obi stopped short of making a direct accusation against the government, he maintained that his businesses and daily activities are being deliberately obstructed, insisting that the pattern of events points to targeted harassment.

According to him, the alleged intimidation extends beyond his person, claiming that opposition figures across the country are facing similar treatment.

“They are attacking everybody who is in opposition personally,” he said, adding that he has also been denied benefits and privileges due to him.

To buttress his claim, Obi recounted an incident at an airport where, according to him, officials locked his vehicle while leaving other parked vehicles untouched. He said that even after identifying himself, the officer in charge ignored his complaint.

“But I said, ‘Look at the cars of other people.’ And you could see them talking to each other, as if, ‘Who is this one?'” he recalled.

Obi further claimed that the atmosphere of fear has become so pervasive that some of his associates now avoid being seen with him publicly, while others have asked him not to attend their family events to avoid possible repercussions.

“I have people send me invitations and say, ‘My son, my daughter is wedding, but please don’t come,'” he said.

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

Deregistration: Court adjourns hearing on ADC, four other political parties’ appeal

Published

on

Deregistration: Court adjourns hearing on ADC, four other political parties' appeal

Deregistration: Court adjourns hearing on ADC, four other political parties’ appeal

The Court of Appeal in Abuja has adjourned until Tuesday, July 14, 2026, the hearing of an appeal challenging the deregistration of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Accord Party, Action Alliance (AA), Action Peoples Party (APP) and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP).

The appellate court granted the adjournment after lawyers representing the parties informed the court that although some legal processes had been filed and served, they were yet to receive and respond to all outstanding briefs necessary for the hearing of the appeal.

The appeal seeks to overturn a judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister the five political parties over their alleged failure to meet constitutional requirements relating to electoral performance.

When the matter came up on Monday before a three-member panel led by Justice Abubakar Mohammed, counsel for all parties jointly requested more time to complete the exchange of legal documents.

The lawyers explained that they had filed and served some of their processes but were still awaiting response briefs from other parties before the substantive hearing could proceed.

After listening to the applications, the appellate court granted the request and fixed July 14 for hearing.

The court also directed all parties to ensure that every outstanding brief of argument is filed and served before the adjourned date to avoid further delays and enable the appeal to proceed on its merits.

READ ALSO:

The latest adjournment follows an earlier postponement from June 25 to July 7, which was granted after counsel to the Accord Party, Musibau Adetunbi (SAN), informed the court that the record of appeal and the certified copy of the Federal High Court judgment had only recently been transmitted to the Court of Appeal.

According to the senior advocate, the transmission of the court records was necessary before parties could prepare, file and exchange their respective briefs of argument.

None of the parties opposed the request for an adjournment at the time, prompting the appellate court to grant additional time for the completion of the legal processes.

The legal dispute originated from a judgment delivered by Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, who ordered INEC to deregister the ADC, Accord Party, Action Alliance, Action Peoples Party and Zenith Labour Party.

Justice Lifu held that the affected political parties failed to satisfy the constitutional threshold stipulated under Section 225 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) regarding electoral performance in previous general elections.

The trial court ruled that the parties did not secure the minimum constitutional requirements to remain registered political parties and consequently directed INEC to remove them from its register.

The judgment further restrained the electoral commission from recognising the affected parties, accepting candidates nominated by them or allowing them to participate in the 2027 general elections.

Justice Lifu also ordered the parties to stop presenting themselves as registered political parties in Nigeria after upholding a suit instituted by the National Forum of Former Legislators (NFFL).

However, the ruling immediately generated legal challenges after the affected parties argued that the Federal High Court proceeded to deliver its judgment despite an earlier order of the Court of Appeal directing the trial court to stay proceedings pending the determination of an interlocutory appeal already before the appellate court.

In an earlier unanimous ruling, the Court of Appeal strongly criticised the action of the lower court, describing it as a breach of judicial hierarchy and constitutional procedure.

Justice Abubakar Mohammed observed that once a superior court issues an order, lower courts are constitutionally bound to comply with it until it is set aside.

He stressed that the appellate court has a duty to preserve the integrity of the judicial process and ensure obedience to its orders.

Consequently, the Court of Appeal ordered a stay of execution of Justice Lifu’s judgment pending the determination of the substantive appeal.

The decision effectively suspended the enforcement of the deregistration order, allowing the ADC, Accord Party, Action Alliance, Action Peoples Party and Zenith Labour Party to retain their legal status until the appeal is finally determined.

The outcome of the appeal is expected to have significant implications for Nigeria’s political landscape ahead of the 2027 general elections, particularly following recent political realignments involving opposition parties.

The ADC, which has recently attracted several prominent opposition politicians, is widely regarded as one of the parties that could play a major role in the build-up to the next presidential election.

The Court of Appeal is expected to begin substantive hearing of the appeal on July 14, provided all parties comply with its directive to file and exchange all outstanding briefs before the adjourned date.

Deregistration: Court adjourns hearing on ADC, four other political parties’ appeal

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending