Iran Denies Request for Strike Pause as Trump Extends Deadline to April 6 - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Iran Denies Request for Strike Pause as Trump Extends Deadline to April 6

Published

on

Iran’s newly appointed supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei and United States President Donald Trump

Iran Denies Request for Strike Pause as Trump Extends Deadline to April 6

Washington, March 27, 2026 – U.S. President Donald Trump has announced a temporary pause on attacks targeting Iran’s energy infrastructure, extending the deadline until April 6, 2026, claiming that Tehran requested the move.

In a statement released late Wednesday, Trump said that the pause, initially requested by Iran for seven days, had been extended to ten days by the United States to allow for ongoing negotiations. “They asked for seven; I gave them ten,” Trump said, emphasizing his administration’s desire to pursue dialogue while maintaining a firm stance on U.S. interests in the region.

The announcement comes amid the escalating conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran, which has seen repeated drone attacks and threats over strategic locations, including the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil shipping route.

Conflicting Reports from Tehran

Despite Trump’s claims, reports from independent mediators and Iranian officials have denied that Tehran formally requested the pause. Sources suggest that while discussions are ongoing, no official request has been made by the Iranian government for a suspension of U.S. strikes. Analysts say the conflicting statements highlight the uncertainty surrounding the situation, as both sides attempt to assert their narratives.

The ongoing tension has already affected global energy markets, with oil prices remaining volatile due to the threat to Iran’s energy infrastructure and potential disruptions in the region.

Global Reactions and Implications

International observers have called for caution, noting that unilateral claims about negotiations can further complicate diplomatic efforts. While Trump’s announcement appears aimed at projecting progress in talks, the absence of confirmation from Iran raises questions about the credibility of the pause.

Experts warn that any miscommunication or misunderstanding could escalate hostilities, particularly in light of Iran’s previous retaliatory attacks and the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz in global oil transport.

As the April 6 deadline approaches, both the United States and Iran remain under global scrutiny, with nations monitoring developments closely to gauge whether the temporary pause could evolve into a broader diplomatic resolution or spark renewed confrontation.

Iran Denies Request for Strike Pause as Trump Extends Deadline to April 6

Loading

International

Reuters: Saudi Arabia, UAE Secretly Bombed Iran During Gulf War

Published

on

Saudi Arabia, UAE Secretly Bombed Iran During Gulf War

Reuters: Saudi Arabia, UAE Secretly Bombed Iran During Gulf War

Fresh revelations from multiple international media investigations have exposed how Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) allegedly carried out covert military strikes against Iran during the recent Middle East war, despite publicly distancing themselves from direct involvement in the conflict.

According to a detailed investigation by Reuters, Saudi Arabia secretly launched several retaliatory airstrikes inside Iran in late March 2026 after Iranian missiles and drones repeatedly targeted Saudi cities, airports, oil installations, and strategic infrastructure.

The report, which cited Western and Iranian officials familiar with the operations, said the attacks were conducted by the Saudi Air Force and marked the first known instance of Riyadh carrying out direct military action on Iranian territory.

Although Saudi authorities neither officially confirmed nor denied the operations, the revelations suggest a dramatic shift in the kingdom’s long-standing regional security strategy.

The covert strikes reportedly followed an intense escalation in the wider Middle East conflict, which began after joint US-Israeli military operations against Tehran earlier in the year.

During the conflict, Iran launched waves of missiles and drones across Gulf states hosting American military assets. Reports indicated that all six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) — including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman — experienced varying levels of attacks.

While Tehran maintained that its operations targeted US military facilities, civilian infrastructure was also affected. Airports, oil facilities, and energy infrastructure in Gulf countries reportedly suffered significant disruptions.

READ ALSO:

The conflict also affected global trade as the strategically important Strait of Hormuz became partially paralysed, raising fears of a global oil supply crisis and surging energy prices.

Reuters reported that Iran launched more than 105 missile and drone attacks on Saudi Arabia between March 25 and March 31 alone. However, following Saudi Arabia’s alleged retaliatory strikes and subsequent diplomatic contacts between both countries, the number of attacks reportedly dropped significantly in early April.

Western and Iranian officials told Reuters that Riyadh quietly warned Tehran of further retaliation if attacks on the kingdom continued, while simultaneously opening diplomatic backchannels aimed at preventing a wider regional war.

The latest revelations also implicated the United Arab Emirates in the conflict.

Separate reports by The Telegraph and The Wall Street Journal claimed that Emirati forces secretly carried out attacks against Iranian targets around the same period US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Washington and Tehran after five weeks of military confrontation.

One of the reported UAE operations allegedly targeted an oil refinery on Iran’s Lavan Island in the Persian Gulf in early April.

The refinery strike reportedly caused significant fires and temporarily disrupted refinery operations.

Despite the allegations, Abu Dhabi consistently maintained publicly that it sought regional stability and denied taking offensive military action against Iran during the conflict.

However, reports suggested the UAE adopted a more aggressive stance behind closed doors, believing Iran needed to face direct consequences for attacks on Gulf infrastructure.

The Wall Street Journal also reported that Israel quietly assisted Emirati operations through intelligence coordination and defensive military support during the conflict.

Analysts say the alleged covert operations by Saudi Arabia and the UAE represent one of the most significant shifts in Gulf geopolitics in recent decades.

For years, Gulf monarchies largely relied on the United States for protection against Iranian threats while avoiding direct military confrontation with Tehran.

But the latest reports indicate both Saudi Arabia and the UAE may now be willing to carry out direct retaliatory strikes when their territories are attacked.

The war eventually began to de-escalate after Washington and Tehran agreed to a ceasefire on April 7, 2026, though tensions across the Middle East remain high.

The developments have continued to generate widespread international attention amid concerns that future confrontations between Iran and Gulf states could trigger broader instability across global energy markets and international shipping routes.

Reuters: Saudi Arabia, UAE Secretly Bombed Iran During Gulf War

Loading

Continue Reading

International

FG in Advanced Talks With World Bank for Fresh $1.25bn Loan Facility

Published

on

FG in Advanced Talks With World Bank for Fresh $1.25bn Loan Facility

FG in Advanced Talks With World Bank for Fresh $1.25bn Loan Facility

The Federal Government is currently in advanced negotiations with the World Bank over a proposed $1.25 billion loan facility aimed at supporting economic reforms, investment growth, job creation, and improved competitiveness in Nigeria.

Details of the proposed financing were contained in a World Bank project document titled “Nigeria Actions for Investment and Jobs Acceleration,” which showed that discussions have moved into the critical decision-meeting stage of the lender’s approval process ahead of possible Board consideration on June 26, 2026.

The project has already progressed beyond the initial concept, appraisal, and negotiation stages, indicating that major policy reforms, financing terms, and implementation conditions have largely been agreed upon between Nigerian authorities and the World Bank team.

According to the document, the loan is designed “to support the government’s efforts to expand access to finance, digital, and electricity services, and strengthen competitiveness through tax, trade, and agriculture reforms.”

If approved, the facility would become one of the largest loans secured by President Bola Tinubu’s administration and the second-largest World Bank financing package obtained by Nigeria since the approval of the $1.5 billion Reforms for Economic Stabilisation to Enable Transformation Development Policy Financing in June 2024.

The borrower is officially listed as the Federal Republic of Nigeria, while the Federal Ministry of Finance will serve as the implementing agency for the programme.

Under the World Bank approval system, the decision-meeting phase represents one of the final internal stages before projects are forwarded to the institution’s Board of Executive Directors for formal approval.

The World Bank document stated: “The review did authorise the team to appraise and negotiate,” indicating that the proposed facility has successfully passed key internal assessments and is moving closer to final approval.

READ ALSO:

The fresh loan discussions come amid growing public scrutiny over Nigeria’s rising debt burden and increasing dependence on multilateral financing to support reforms and infrastructure development.

According to recent debt figures, Nigeria’s external debt stood at approximately $51.86 billion as of December 31, 2025, while the country’s total public debt profile has risen to about $110.97 billion.

Reports show that between June 2023 and May 2026, the World Bank approved approximately $9.35 billion in loans and credits for Nigeria across sectors including power, healthcare, education, agriculture, renewable energy, social protection, MSME financing, and fiscal reform support.

Some of the major financing packages approved during the period include the $2.25 billion RESET and ARMOR reform financing package approved in June 2024, $1.57 billion for the HOPE and SPIN programmes in September 2024, and $1.08 billion for education and resilience programmes approved in March 2025.

Analysts say the latest loan request reflects the Federal Government’s continued reliance on concessional multilateral financing to sustain ongoing reforms, support critical infrastructure, and stimulate economic growth amid declining revenues, inflationary pressures, and foreign exchange challenges.

The development also comes days after the Accountant-General of the Federation, Shamseldeen Ogunjimi, warned that Nigeria may reconsider future World Bank financing arrangements if approval and disbursement delays continue beyond six months.

Speaking in Abuja during a meeting with a World Bank delegation led by Mrs Treed Lane, Ogunjimi stressed that Nigeria expects faster processing timelines since the facilities are repayable loans and not grants.

“If approvals take more than six months, the Nigerian Government may no longer honour such arrangements,” he said, according to a statement issued by the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation.

He further argued that prolonged approval processes could disrupt project implementation schedules, fiscal planning, and broader development objectives, urging the World Bank to accelerate the approval and disbursement of funds tied to Nigeria’s priority projects.

Economists say while multilateral loans generally offer lower interest rates and longer repayment periods compared to commercial borrowing, concerns remain over Nigeria’s rising debt servicing obligations and the sustainability of continuous external borrowing.

FG in Advanced Talks With World Bank for Fresh $1.25bn Loan Facility

Loading

Continue Reading

International

Israel Jails Soldiers Over Virgin Mary Statue Desecration in Lebanon

Published

on

Israel Jails Soldiers Over Virgin Mary Statue Desecration in Lebanon

Israel Jails Soldiers Over Virgin Mary Statue Desecration in Lebanon

The Israeli military has sentenced two soldiers to prison after they were involved in the desecration of a statue of the Virgin Mary in southern Lebanon, an incident that has sparked outrage among Christian communities and drawn international condemnation.

According to reports by CNN and other international media outlets, a photograph circulated widely on social media showing an Israeli soldier holding a cigarette to the mouth of a Virgin Mary statue in the predominantly Christian village of Debel in southern Lebanon.

In response to the backlash, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) confirmed that disciplinary action had been taken against the soldiers involved.

The military announced that the soldier seen desecrating the statue was sentenced to 21 days in military prison, while the soldier who photographed the incident received a 14-day prison sentence.

In an official statement, the IDF condemned the soldiers’ conduct and reiterated its commitment to respecting religious freedom and sacred sites.

“The IDF views the incident with great severity and respects freedom of religion and worship, as well as holy sites and religious symbols of all religions and communities,” the military stated.

According to the Israeli military, the incident occurred several weeks ago during military operations in Debel, a Christian-majority border village in southern Lebanon that has experienced repeated Israeli troop presence amid ongoing tensions with Hezbollah.

READ ALSO:

The controversy has intensified concerns over alleged misconduct by Israeli soldiers in southern Lebanon, especially after similar incidents emerged from the same village in recent weeks.

In April, the IDF reportedly jailed two soldiers and questioned six others after another Israeli soldier was photographed smashing a statue of Jesus Christ in Debel using a blunt object.

Shortly afterward, the Israeli military announced a separate investigation after videos surfaced online allegedly showing troops vandalising solar panels, damaging civilian property and destroying a vehicle outside the village.

The incidents have generated criticism from religious leaders, humanitarian organisations and foreign governments concerned about attacks on Christian symbols and civilian infrastructure in conflict zones.

The Assembly of Catholic Ordinaries of the Holy Land previously described the destruction and desecration of Christian statues in Lebanon as a “grave affront” to Christianity and called for accountability.

Reports also indicated that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned earlier acts of vandalism against Christian symbols and assured that disciplinary measures would be taken against those responsible.

The Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs also criticised the latest incident, describing the desecration of the Virgin Mary statue as offensive to Christian religious sensitivities.

Debel, located near the Israeli-Lebanese border, is one of several Christian villages affected by the renewed conflict between Israel and Hezbollah following months of escalating regional tensions.

Residents of the area have repeatedly complained about damage to homes, churches, water systems, solar infrastructure and farmland caused by military operations and cross-border hostilities.

The ongoing clashes between Israeli forces and Hezbollah fighters have displaced thousands of civilians across southern Lebanon and northern Israel, despite international calls for de-escalation and ceasefire negotiations.

Security analysts say the repeated incidents involving Christian symbols could further complicate tensions in the region by increasing fears among minority Christian communities already struggling with instability and displacement.

Although disciplinary action against Israeli soldiers over battlefield misconduct is considered relatively uncommon, the IDF said it intends to reinforce operational guidelines regarding the protection of religious institutions and sacred objects during military deployments.

The latest development has continued to attract widespread reactions online, with many observers calling for stronger measures to prevent future violations involving religious sites and civilian communities during armed conflicts.

 

Israel Jails Soldiers Over Virgin Mary Statue Desecration in Lebanon

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending