metro
Agbekoya warns protesters to stay away from Lagos, South-West
Agbekoya warns protesters to stay away from Lagos, South-West
Agbekoya Parapo, a Yoruba socio-cultural and farmers organisation, has warned those who are allegedly inciting violent protests in Lagos and other southwest states against the consequences, saying that those with ulterior motives should steer clear of the zone.
Agbekoya Parapo spoke in a statement titled, ‘Agbekoya Parapo’s position on the upcoming nationwide protest by youths and opposition against President Bola Tinubu’s government,’ made available to reporters in Ibadan on Tuesday.
The statement was issued after a meeting attended by its President General, Aare Kunle Oshodi; the Secretary General, Chief Kunle Adelakun Eruobodo; Chairman, Elders Council, Agbekoya Parapo, Prof. Ademola Onibonokuta, Prof. Amusa, Pastor Benson Olayanju, Comrade Adebayo Balogun and Chief Remilekun Oyelami.
While saluting the Nigerian youths for their courage and commitment to throw their weight behind the quest for a better country, Agbekoya Parapo advised those with ulterior motives to “reconsider their plans and move their protests to Abuja and their respective states of origin” rather than pressing their points in the South-West, insisting that “We shall never allow what happened in Lagos during #EndSARS to repeat itself.”
According to the statement, it is very sad and pathetic that the current generation of youths has waited for so long to address the inefficiency, injustice, oppression, and lack of equity from the ruling class and constituted authorities.
The statement read in part: “We are very much aware that Nigeria belongs to every one of us and that the dividends of democracy should and must be felt by every Nigerian. In view of the impending protests, there are a few salient questions and fundamental issues that the present youths, the opposition, and the organizers of the August protests need to understand to grasp the nature and complexity of the Nigerian state:
“What was the reason behind the removal of history from the secondary education curriculum? Why did the Nigerian military take over the civilian government in the January 1966 coup? And, why was there a counter-coup in July 1966?
“Why and who imposed the unitary system of government on Nigeria’s regional structures designed by the British colonialists? What were the causes of Nigeria’s military coups/rules in the 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s, especially after the civil war of 1967-1970, and who were the beneficiaries of those coups?
READ ALSO:
- I’m focused on Yoruba Nation agitation not hunger protest – Igboho
- FG suspends Arik Air operations, airline mgt kicks
- Anambra woman who accused husband of defiling their 3-year-old daughter demands justice
“Is there any official reason why the freest, fairest, and most transparent June (12) 1993 Presidential election was annulled? Whose interests were served, and who benefited from the June 12 annulment? Why have the coupists/perpetrators not been prosecuted to this day? Lastly, is Nigeria free from neo-colonialism?
“The fundamental truth is that Nigerians have been struggling since the military took over civilian administration in the First Republic in the January 1966 coup and the July 15 counter-coup. Furthermore, the 1999 Constitution, which was drafted by General (Sanni) Abacha’s stooges under Prof Yadudu, does not help matters.
“There is no doubt that the 1999 Constitution is a fraudulent and corrupt document, full of lacunae. This is the fundamental reason why the country is in shambles and without peace. The ruling elites exploit these constitutional deficiencies to milk the country dry, while the masses and youths are left at the mercy of God.
“Things have deteriorated in Nigeria, and there’s no magic wand under the less-than-two-year government of President Tinubu. We are all gradually approaching the end of these games. Nonetheless, the solution is bitter and hard to say, but something will surely lead to something. We can’t build something on nothing.
“We are using this medium to warn those who are hell-bent on destroying Yoruba land, including the promoters, organizers, and opposition to President Tinubu’s administration, to reconsider their plans and move their protests to Abuja and their respective states of origin, not Lagos and Yoruba land.
“Protesters should direct their grievances to Abuja, the Federal Capital Territory. We will not condone any action that may destroy our heritage in Lagos State or any of the Yoruba states. Despite Lagos being the commercial hub of Nigeria, it holds deeper significance for every Yoruba person; it is the hope of the average Yoruba man.
“The destruction and agony caused by the #EndSARS saga still linger. Who could have imagined that the palace of the revered Oba of Lagos could be attacked, a sacrilege on our temple, by uncouth, uncivilized, and irresponsible people of other tribes?
“Our experience during the last #EndSARS protest is enough for our decision. The Southwest has yet to fully recover. The properties destroyed during that single attack were estimated to be worth billions of naira, with no compensation from the federal authorities.
“Most of our farmlands have been destroyed by herders, resulting in billions of naira worth of agricultural products being lost. Many of our farmers have been killed, and many could no longer go to their farms for fear of being killed.”
It urged the governors in the zone to be more sensitive and proactive by showing greater commitment to the plights of the people in line with the ethos of Omoluabi being attributed to the region.
Agbekoya warns protesters to stay away from Lagos, South-West
![]()
metro
Christian Council opposes ₦50,000 fine for bus preaching, seeks Tinubu’s intervention
Christian Council opposes ₦50,000 fine for bus preaching, seeks Tinubu’s intervention
The Christian Council of Nigeria (CCN) has called on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the National Assembly (NASS) to review contentious provisions of the proposed Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) Act (Amendment) Bill, 2026, warning that parts of the legislation could infringe on constitutional rights and impose additional hardship on struggling Nigerians.
The appeal follows the passage of the FRSC Amendment Bill, 2026 by the Senate, which proposes a ₦50,000 fine for anyone found hawking, trading or preaching in commercial buses, as well as stiffer penalties for several traffic-related offences. The bill is awaiting presidential assent before it can become law.
In a statement signed by its General Secretary, Rt. Rev. Evans Onyemara, the council said it fully supports efforts aimed at improving road safety and reducing accidents on Nigerian roads but insisted that such measures must respect the constitutional rights of citizens.
According to the CCN, the inclusion of preaching alongside hawking and trading among prohibited activities raises legitimate concerns over the constitutional rights to freedom of religion and freedom of expression guaranteed under the 1999 Constitution.
The council argued that while government has a responsibility to ensure road safety, legislation should not inadvertently criminalise peaceful religious activities carried out without disrupting drivers or passengers.
It noted that commercial buses have, for decades, served as platforms where Christians share brief messages of hope, repentance, encouragement and prayers with willing listeners, adding that any attempt to prohibit such activities deserves careful constitutional scrutiny.
According to the council, restricting peaceful evangelism without adequate consultation could create the perception that Christian religious expression is being unfairly targeted.
READ ALSO:
- EFCC secures final forfeiture of 52 luxury Lekki homes in landmark court ruling
- 2027 Gombe election: Pantami secures major boost as PDP aspirant withdraws court case
- MURIC backs FRSC bill to ban preaching, hawking in commercial buses
The CCN further expressed concern over the proposed ₦50,000 fine for hawkers, describing the penalty as harsh and insensitive to the prevailing economic realities facing millions of Nigerians.
It argued that many citizens engage in hawking and informal trading due to unemployment, poverty, inflation and the rising cost of living, stressing that poverty should not be criminalised through heavy financial penalties.
Rather than relying on punitive sanctions, the council urged the Federal Government to address the root causes of street trading by creating more employment opportunities, expanding social intervention programmes and implementing sustainable economic empowerment initiatives.
It also recommended the establishment of designated trading areas and age-appropriate restrictions where necessary instead of imposing blanket penalties on vulnerable Nigerians trying to earn a living.
The Christian body appealed to President Tinubu, the National Assembly and the Federal Road Safety Corps to embark on wider consultations before the bill is signed into law.
It said the consultation process should include faith-based organisations, civil society organisations, transport unions, road safety experts, constitutional lawyers and representatives of vulnerable groups to ensure that the final legislation adequately balances public safety with fundamental human rights.
According to the CCN, Nigeria needs laws that are firm enough to protect lives on the highways but compassionate enough to avoid placing unbearable burdens on citizens already grappling with severe economic hardship.
The council maintained that legislation should promote national unity, protect fundamental freedoms and avoid creating perceptions of discrimination against any religious group.
The latest appeal comes amid growing public debate over the proposed amendment. While the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has endorsed the provision seeking to prohibit preaching in commercial buses, arguing that it would reduce driver distraction and help curb road accidents, several Christian organisations have urged the government to review the proposal to safeguard constitutionally guaranteed religious freedoms.
Legal analysts say the controversy surrounding the bill underscores the need for lawmakers to strike a careful balance between strengthening road safety regulations and protecting citizens’ fundamental rights as enshrined in the Constitution.
With the legislation now awaiting presidential assent, stakeholders across religious, legal and civil society circles are expected to intensify advocacy over the bill before a final decision is taken by the Presidency.
Christian Council opposes ₦50,000 fine for bus preaching, seeks Tinubu’s intervention
![]()
metro
EFCC secures final forfeiture of 52 luxury Lekki homes in landmark court ruling
EFCC secures final forfeiture of 52 luxury Lekki homes in landmark court ruling
A Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos, has ordered the permanent forfeiture of 52 terrace and maisonette housing units in the upscale Lekki area of Lagos State to the Federal Government, handing the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) one of its biggest asset recovery victories in recent years.
Justice Alexandra Owoeye delivered the landmark judgment on July 15, 2026, after granting an application filed by the Lagos Zonal Directorate 2 of the EFCC, which argued that the properties were reasonably suspected to have been acquired with proceeds of unlawful activities.
The forfeited properties are located at Mercyville Estate, Covenant Way, off New Road, Ilasan, Lekki, and were recovered from Fielddreams Limited, Ifeanyi Nweke and Amex Savings and Loans Limited, according to the anti-graft agency.
The ruling followed a lengthy legal process that began on August 14, 2024, when the EFCC secured an interim forfeiture order from Justice Akintayo Aluko after filing an ex parte application.
As required by law, the court directed the commission to publish the interim forfeiture order in a national newspaper, inviting anyone claiming ownership or interest in the properties to appear before the court and show cause why the estate should not be permanently forfeited to the Federal Government.
Following the publication, the respondents filed a counter-affidavit opposing the final forfeiture application. They initially claimed that the funds used to develop the estate were generated from the sale of part of a landed property and 29 terrace and maisonette housing units, which they valued at approximately ₦1.9 billion.
READ ALSO:
- 2027 Gombe election: Pantami secures major boost as PDP aspirant withdraws court case
- MURIC backs FRSC bill to ban preaching, hawking in commercial buses
- Police Hunt Teacher Over Alleged Flogging to Death of 12-Year-Old Pupil in Anambra
However, the respondents later changed their position by alleging that several of the housing units had not been completed. The EFCC argued that the new claim directly contradicted their earlier sworn affidavit, in which they maintained that proceeds from previous property sales were used to complete the furnishing and interior decoration of the remaining units and that construction of the estate had already been completed in 2020.
During the hearing, EFCC counsel Franklin Ofoma informed the court that the commission had fully complied with the publication order issued during the interim forfeiture proceedings. He said the application for final forfeiture was supported by a 31-paragraph affidavit deposed to by Afolabi Seyi Oladele, a litigation officer in the commission’s Legal Department.
The anti-graft agency maintained that its investigations established reasonable grounds to believe that the properties represented proceeds of unlawful activities, making them liable to forfeiture under Nigeria’s asset recovery laws.
The commission also informed the court that the second respondent, Ifeanyi Nweke, is a fugitive facing criminal prosecution. According to the EFCC, Nweke failed to appear before Justice R.A. Oshodi and Justice Okunuga in separate criminal proceedings despite being required to answer charges filed against him.
The EFCC further disclosed that two subsisting warrants of arrest had already been issued against Nweke after he allegedly jumped the administrative bail earlier granted to him by the commission.
In her judgment, Justice Owoeye held that the respondents’ affidavit contained material contradictions that undermined its credibility. She ruled that the court could not selectively rely on conflicting pieces of evidence presented by the respondents.
Consequently, the judge rejected the respondents’ affidavit in its entirety, holding that there was no credible opposition to the EFCC’s application for final forfeiture.
Justice Owoeye further ruled that the commission had successfully demonstrated reasonable grounds to suspect that the estate was acquired with proceeds of unlawful activities. She therefore granted the application and ordered that all 52 terrace and maisonette housing units be permanently forfeited to the Federal Government.
The judgment represents another significant milestone in the EFCC’s campaign against corruption, money laundering and financial crimes. In recent years, the commission has intensified the use of Nigeria’s non-conviction-based asset forfeiture framework to recover assets believed to have been acquired through illicit wealth, even where related criminal proceedings remain pending.
Legal analysts say the ruling reinforces the courts’ support for lawful asset recovery while underscoring the importance of presenting consistent and credible evidence in forfeiture proceedings.
With the judgment, ownership of the 52 housing units now officially vests in the Federal Government, which is expected to determine the future use of the properties in line with existing laws and national interest.
EFCC secures final forfeiture of 52 luxury Lekki homes in landmark court ruling
![]()
metro
MURIC backs FRSC bill to ban preaching, hawking in commercial buses
MURIC backs FRSC bill to ban preaching, hawking in commercial buses
The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has thrown its weight behind a proposed Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) bill seeking to prohibit preaching and hawking inside commercial buses, describing the move as a necessary step to improve road safety and maintain public order.
In a statement issued on Saturday, the organisation’s Founder and Executive Director, Professor Ishaq Akintola, said the proposed legislation was “a step in the right direction” and praised the FRSC for what he described as a proactive initiative aimed at reducing distractions that could lead to road crashes.
According to MURIC, preaching inside commercial vehicles distracts drivers, increasing the risk of accidents, while also creating situations capable of causing public disturbance among passengers.
The group argued that bus preaching is inconsistent with global best practices, noting that similar activities are not permitted in commercial public transport systems in major cities such as London, Paris and Frankfurt.
READ ALSO:
- Police Hunt Teacher Over Alleged Flogging to Death of 12-Year-Old Pupil in Anambra
- My Period Saved Me: Oyo Woman Escapes Rape by Armed Bororo Fulani Attackers
- Case for replicating the Oyo kidnap-rescue template nationwide, By Farooq Kperogi
Akintola said bus preachers frequently board intra-city, inter-city and interstate commercial buses, sometimes preaching throughout long-distance journeys, a practice he described as discourteous to passengers and potentially dangerous for road users.
He said MURIC’s support for the bill is based on two key considerations: the need to minimise driver distraction and the need to prevent conflicts that may arise from unsolicited religious activities in confined public spaces.
The Islamic rights organisation further stated that passengers often tolerate bus preaching despite finding it disruptive, adding that disagreements arising from such activities have, in some cases, led to altercations.
MURIC urged members of the National Assembly to expedite consideration of the proposed bill, citing Nigeria’s persistent road safety challenges.
The group referenced FRSC road crash statistics, which showed thousands of crashes, fatalities and injuries recorded across the country in recent years, arguing that measures capable of reducing distractions on the roads should receive legislative backing.
Akintola also observed that bus preaching is more commonly associated with Christian evangelists and called on Christian leaders and churches, particularly in the South-West, to discourage the practice among their members.
He maintained that preventing distractions capable of contributing to fatal road crashes should take precedence in efforts to improve road safety nationwide.
The proposed FRSC bill also seeks to prohibit hawking on highways and prescribes penalties for violations as part of broader efforts to enhance safety on Nigerian roads.
MURIC backs FRSC bill to ban preaching, hawking in commercial buses
![]()
-
metro1 day agoFG Arraigns Three Suspects Over Abduction of Oyo Schoolchildren, Teachers
-
metro2 days agoMary Habila: NYCN gives David Umahi seven days to resign, threatens nationwide protest
-
News1 day agoJust in: Supreme Court Orders Final Forfeiture of Emefiele’s Assets, Ends Legal Battle
-
News1 day agoSenate passes Bill proposing N50,000 fine for preaching, hawking in commercial buses
-
metro2 days agoCAC Commences Deregistration of 100,000 Companies Over Unfiled Annual Returns
-
News2 days agoAppeal Court Restores INEC Guidelines, Paves Way for 2027 General Elections
-
metro2 days agoBREAKING: “I’ve Never Met Him”: Gbajabiamila Files ₦15bn Defamation Suit Against PFIPC DG
-
News2 days agoSanwo-Olu Tours Flood-hit Lagos Communities, Orders Urgent Drainage Works, Long-term Fixes
