Fresh indictment: Trump ordered to appear in Washington court Thursday – Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Fresh indictment: Trump ordered to appear in Washington court Thursday

Published

on

Former president Donald Trump

Fresh indictment: Trump ordered to appear in Washington court Thursday

Former U.S. President Donald Trump will make an initial appearance in federal court in Washington on Thursday, following his latest indictment by a grand jury for attempting to overturn the 2020 election result.

The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who was appointed by Trump’s predecessor Barack Obama.

Trump was indicted on Tuesday, the third time in four months he has been criminally charged even as he campaigns as front runner to regain the presidency next year.

The four-count, 45-page indictment charges Trump with conspiring to defraud the U.S. by preventing Congress from certifying Democrat Joe Biden’s victory and to deprive voters of their right to a fair election.

Then-President Trump pushed fraud claims he knew to be untrue, pressured state and federal officials – including Vice President Mike Pence – to alter the results and finally incited a violent assault on the U.S. Capitol in a desperate attempt to undermine American democracy and cling to power, prosecutors said.

The charges stem from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s sprawling investigation into allegations Trump sought to reverse his loss to Biden.

READ ALSO:

Despite a dizzying and growing array of legal troubles, Trump has solidified his status as the front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, according to public opinion polls.

Weeks of assertions that the election had been stolen culminated in a fiery Trump speech on Jan. 6, 2021, as Congress met to certify the results.

Soon after, his supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol in a bid to stop Congress from formalizing Biden’s victory.

In a brief statement to reporters, Smith placed the blame for the violence squarely on Trump’s shoulders.

“The attack on our nation’s Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, was an unprecedented assault on the seat of American democracy. As described in the indictment, it was fuelled by lies – lies by the defendant, targeted at obstructing the bedrock function of the U.S. government,” Smith said.

More than 1,000 people have been arrested in connection with the attack.

PHONEY SLATE OF ELECTORS
Trump and others organized fraudulent slates of electors in seven states, all of which he lost, to be certified as official by Congress on Jan. 6, the indictment said.

The indictment lays out numerous examples of Trump’s election falsehoods and notes that close advisers, including senior intelligence officials, told him repeatedly that the results were legitimate.

“These claims were false, and the defendant knew that they were false,” prosecutors wrote.

When the push to certify the fake electors failed, Trump sought to pressure Vice President Mike Pence not to allow certification of the election to go forward, and took advantage of the chaos outside the Capitol to do so, according to prosecutors. During the violence, Trump rebuffed calls from his advisers to issue a calming message.

READ ALSO:

“The Defendant attempted to use a crowd of supporters that he had gathered in Washington, D.C. to pressure the Vice President to fraudulently alter the election results,” the indictment reads.

In a statement, the Trump campaign said he had always followed the law and characterized the indictment as a “persecution” reminiscent of Nazi Germany.

“President Trump will not be deterred by disgraceful and unprecedented political targeting!” it added. Later Tuesday, Trump’s campaign sent out a fundraising email referencing the indictment.

The indictment also includes six unidentified co-conspirators who have not been charged.

Based on the descriptions, they appear to include Trump’s former personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, who called state lawmakers in the weeks following the 2020 election to pressure them not to certify their states’ results; former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark, who tried to get himself installed as attorney general so he could launch voter fraud investigations in Georgia and other swing states; and attorney John Eastman, who advanced the erroneous legal theory that Pence could block the electoral certification.

The most serious charge against Trump carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, though sentencing is based on numerous factors and is subject to the judge’s discretion.

MOUNTING LEGAL WOES

Trump already had become the first former U.S. president to face criminal charges. He has portrayed all of the prosecutions as part of a politically motivated witch hunt aimed at preventing his return to power.

Fresh indictment: Trump ordered to appear in Washington court Thursday

International

Chinese state linked to hacking of UK Defence Ministry

Published

on

Chinese state linked to hacking of UK Defence Ministry

Sky News has learned of a significant data breach at the Ministry of Defence (MoD), with indications pointing towards state-sponsored hacking by China. The breach targeted service personnel, prompting concerns about national security and individual safety.

According to sources, the cyberattack, allegedly orchestrated by the Chinese state, targeted the MoD’s payroll system, compromising the personal information, including names and bank details, of both current service personnel and veterans. While all salaries for this month will be disbursed as planned, the breach raises serious concerns about the vulnerability of sensitive government systems.

Conservative MP Tobias Ellwood, a former soldier, expressed suspicions that China may exploit the financial vulnerability of affected individuals for coercive purposes. Defence Secretary Grant Shapps is expected to address the issue in Parliament, outlining measures to safeguard affected personnel and mitigate future risks.

READ ALSO:

The MoD has moved swiftly to investigate the breach, assuring that no data appears to have been extracted thus far. However, the incident underscores the evolving nature of cyber threats and the imperative of bolstering national defenses in the digital realm.

The breach comes amid escalating tensions between the UK and China, with recent accusations of cyber aggression attributed to “state-affiliated actors.” Labour’s shadow defence secretary, John Healey, has called for a comprehensive response from the government, emphasizing the gravity of the breach and its implications for national security.

Conservative MP Sir Iain Duncan Smith echoed concerns about China’s systemic threat, calling for a recalibration of UK policy in response to Beijing’s hostile activities. The incident underscores the need for heightened vigilance and investment in cybersecurity infrastructure, as advanced warfare increasingly extends into the digital domain.

Chinese state linked to hacking of UK Defence Ministry

Continue Reading

International

Court rules against wife who sued husband for forced ‘unnatural sex’

Published

on

Court rules against wife who sued husband for forced ‘unnatural sex’

An Indian judge has dismissed the complaint of a woman who claimed that her husband committed “unnatural sex,”.

The judge said it is not illegal for a husband to force his wife to engage in sexual acts under the Indian law.

The ruling, made in the Madhya Pradesh High Court last week, highlighted a legal loophole in India that doesn’t criminalise marital rape by a husband against his wife if she’s over age 18, CNN reports.

The woman told police her husband came to her house in 2019, soon after they were married, and committed “unnatural sex,” under Section 377 of India’s penal code, according to the Madhya Pradesh High Court order.

The offence includes non-consensual “carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal,” and was historically used to prosecute same-sex couples who engaged in consensual sex before the Supreme Court decriminalized homosexuality in 2018

The woman also alleged the act happened “on multiple occasions,” and that her husband had threatened to divorce her if she told anyone about it. She finally came forward after telling her mother, who encouraged her to file a complaint in 2022, the court heard.

Meanwhile, the husband challenged his wife’s complaint with his lawyer claiming that any “unnatural sex” between the couple was not criminal as they were married.

READ ALSO:

Delivering his judgement, Justice Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia stressed India’s marital rape exemption, which does not make it a crime for a man to force sex on his wife, a relic of British rule more than 70 years after independence.

“When rape includes insertion of penis in the mouth, urethra or anus of a woman and if that act is committed with his wife, not below the age of fifteen years, then the consent of the wife becomes immaterial … Marital rape has not been recognized so far,” the judge said.

India’s Supreme Court increased marital consent from the age of 15 to 18 in a landmark judgment in 2017.

The woman also accused her in-laws of mental and physical harassment “on account of non-fulfilment of demand of dowry,” the court order said. A trial is pending.

Ahluwalia’s remarks have once again raised questions over India’s treatment of women, who continue to face the threat of violence and discrimination in the deeply patriarchal society.

The world’s largest democracy of 1.4 billion has made significant strides in enacting laws to better safeguard women, but lawyers and campaigners say its reluctance to criminalize marital rape leaves women without adequate protection.

According to the 2019-2021 National Family Health Survey by the Government of India, 17.6% of more than 100,000 women ages 15-49 surveyed said they were unable to say no to their husband if they didn’t want sex, while 11% thought husbands were justified in hitting or beating his wife if she refused.

READ ALSO:

Women alleging rape in India have some avenues of potential legal action against their husbands.

For example, they can seek a restraining order under civil law or charges under Section 354 of India’s Penal Code, which covers sexual assault short of rape, and Section 498A, which covers domestic violence.

These laws are open to interpretation and judges can use them to impose prison sentences for sexual assault in cases where a married woman has alleged rape, but many don’t, lawyer Karuna Nundy previously told CNN.

Many married women are also ignored when they try to file a police complaint, a 2022 study showed.

The study examined records from three Mumbai public hospitals from 2008 to 2017 and found that of 1,664 rape survivors, no rape cases were filed by police. At least 18 of those women reported marital rape to the police, including 10 women who alleged rape by a former partner or husband.

Four women were explicitly told by police that they could not do anything as marital rape was not a crime, the report said.

Over the years, Campaigners have been trying to change the law but said they’re up against conservatives who argue that state interference could destroy the tradition of marriage in India.

Court rules against wife who sued husband for forced ‘unnatural sex’

Continue Reading

International

Netanyahu rubbishes Hamas ceasefire proposal

Published

on

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Netanyahu rubbishes Hamas ceasefire proposal

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected a proposed Gaza ceasefire, deeming it “far from Israel’s basic requirements,” despite Hamas accepting the terms presented by Qatari and Egyptian mediators.

In response to Hamas’s acceptance of the truce terms, Netanyahu stated that negotiations would persist but emphasized that Israel’s military operations near the Rafah border crossing in southern Gaza would continue. Israeli forces and tanks were reportedly observed in the vicinity following overnight airstrikes on Rafah.

Tensions escalated as Israel issued evacuation warnings to Palestinians in eastern Rafah. Thousands sought refuge amid fears of an impending offensive against Hamas hold-outs.

Netanyahu’s office declared Israel’s intent to pursue negotiations while maintaining military pressure on Hamas. The Israeli war cabinet resolved to advance war objectives, including the release of Israeli hostages and the neutralization of Hamas’s military capabilities.

READ ALSO:

Hamas had signaled willingness to cease “hostile activity forever” as part of a two-phase ceasefire deal brokered by Qatar, Egypt, and the United States. The proposed agreement outlined the release of Israeli hostages and the gradual dismantling of Israeli military infrastructure within Gaza.

The United States, engaged in brokering the deal alongside Qatar and Egypt, is currently reviewing Hamas’s response.

The conflict, which began with Hamas incursions into southern Israel, has resulted in significant casualties. Both parties remain entrenched in their positions, with the prospect of a lasting ceasefire hanging in the balance.

Netanyahu rubbishes Hamas ceasefire proposal

Continue Reading

Trending

Skip to content