Owo Church Massacre: Court Sentences Four Terrorists to Death, Acquits One - Newstrends
Connect with us

metro

Owo Church Massacre: Court Sentences Four Terrorists to Death, Acquits One

Published

on

Owo Church Massacre: Court Sentences Four Terrorists to Death, Acquits One

Owo Church Massacre: Court Sentences Four Terrorists to Death, Acquits One

A Federal High Court in Abuja has sentenced four men to death by hanging for their roles in the horrific Owo Catholic Church attack that claimed dozens of lives and left scores injured, bringing a major terrorism trial that has gripped the nation for nearly four years to a close.

Justice Emeka Nwite delivered the judgment on Wednesday in charge number FHC/ABJ/CR/301/2025, ruling that the prosecution successfully proved the allegations against the defendants beyond reasonable doubt.

The four convicted men — Idris Abdulmalik Omeiza, 25, Al Qasim Idris, 20, Jamiu Abdulmalik, 26, and Abdulhaleem Idris, 25 — were found guilty on a nine-count terrorism charge filed by the Department of State Services (DSS) on behalf of the Federal Government.

The court subsequently sentenced all four defendants to death by hanging.

However, the fifth defendant, Momoh Otuho Abubakar, 47, was discharged and acquitted after the court held that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence linking him to the attack.

Justice Nwite held that the convicted men were principal members of a terrorist cell that operated in parts of Kogi and Ondo states. According to the court, evidence presented during the trial showed that the group held planning meetings in Kogi and Ondo states on May 30 and June 4, 2022, before carrying out the deadly attack on St. Francis Xavier Catholic Church, Owo, on June 5, 2022.

The court found that the attackers stormed the church during a Pentecost Sunday Mass armed with AK-47 rifles and improvised explosive devices (IEDs), opening fire on worshippers and detonating explosives inside the church premises. The attack resulted in the deaths of at least 41 worshippers, while more than 140 others sustained varying degrees of injuries. Many victims were women and children who had gathered for the church service when the assailants struck.

READ ALSO:

The five defendants were arrested in August 2022 following extensive intelligence operations by security agencies. Investigators told the court that the suspects were tracked using geospatial network filtering technology, which helped isolate and analyse phone activities within the attack zone.

The prosecution presented substantial evidence during the trial, including confessional statements, digital forensic reports and electronic communications allegedly exchanged among the suspects before and after the attack. In total, the prosecution called 11 witnesses and tendered 23 exhibits to support its case.

One of the exhibits was a Tecno mobile phone recovered during investigations, which reportedly contained communications linking the defendants to the planning and execution of the attack.

Among the prosecution witnesses was a Catholic priest who gave a chilling account of the attack, describing how multiple explosives were detonated within the church during worship. Another eyewitness narrated how he survived by hiding inside a restroom with several children while gunfire and explosions erupted around the church building.

The testimonies painted a grim picture of one of the deadliest attacks on a place of worship in Nigeria’s recent history.

Lead prosecuting counsel, Ayodeji Adedipe (SAN), urged the court to impose the maximum penalty prescribed by law, arguing that the magnitude of the killings and destruction warranted the full weight of justice. On the other hand, defence counsel, Abdullahi Mohammed, asked the court to acquit all five defendants, insisting that the prosecution had failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.

After reviewing the evidence and submissions from both parties, Justice Nwite ruled in favour of the prosecution and convicted the four defendants.

The Owo church massacre sparked widespread condemnation both within and outside Nigeria. The attack drew reactions from religious leaders, governments and international organisations across the world, including Pope Francis, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres, the European Union and the United Kingdom government. The massacre shocked the nation and renewed calls for stronger measures to combat terrorism and violent extremism across Nigeria.

The judgment marks a significant milestone in the quest for justice for victims and survivors of the attack. For families who lost loved ones and those still living with the physical and emotional scars of the tragedy, the verdict represents a major legal victory in the fight against terrorism and impunity.

Although the convicted men retain the constitutional right to appeal the judgment, Wednesday’s verdict is being widely viewed as one of the most consequential terrorism convictions secured in Nigeria in recent years.

Owo Church Massacre: Court Sentences Four Terrorists to Death, Acquits One

Loading

metro

Christian Council opposes ₦50,000 fine for bus preaching, seeks Tinubu’s intervention

Published

on

Christian Council opposes ₦50,000 fine for bus preaching, seeks Tinubu's intervention

Christian Council opposes ₦50,000 fine for bus preaching, seeks Tinubu’s intervention

The Christian Council of Nigeria (CCN) has called on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the National Assembly (NASS) to review contentious provisions of the proposed Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) Act (Amendment) Bill, 2026, warning that parts of the legislation could infringe on constitutional rights and impose additional hardship on struggling Nigerians.

The appeal follows the passage of the FRSC Amendment Bill, 2026 by the Senate, which proposes a ₦50,000 fine for anyone found hawking, trading or preaching in commercial buses, as well as stiffer penalties for several traffic-related offences. The bill is awaiting presidential assent before it can become law.

In a statement signed by its General Secretary, Rt. Rev. Evans Onyemara, the council said it fully supports efforts aimed at improving road safety and reducing accidents on Nigerian roads but insisted that such measures must respect the constitutional rights of citizens.

According to the CCN, the inclusion of preaching alongside hawking and trading among prohibited activities raises legitimate concerns over the constitutional rights to freedom of religion and freedom of expression guaranteed under the 1999 Constitution.

The council argued that while government has a responsibility to ensure road safety, legislation should not inadvertently criminalise peaceful religious activities carried out without disrupting drivers or passengers.

It noted that commercial buses have, for decades, served as platforms where Christians share brief messages of hope, repentance, encouragement and prayers with willing listeners, adding that any attempt to prohibit such activities deserves careful constitutional scrutiny.

According to the council, restricting peaceful evangelism without adequate consultation could create the perception that Christian religious expression is being unfairly targeted.

READ ALSO:

The CCN further expressed concern over the proposed ₦50,000 fine for hawkers, describing the penalty as harsh and insensitive to the prevailing economic realities facing millions of Nigerians.

It argued that many citizens engage in hawking and informal trading due to unemployment, poverty, inflation and the rising cost of living, stressing that poverty should not be criminalised through heavy financial penalties.

Rather than relying on punitive sanctions, the council urged the Federal Government to address the root causes of street trading by creating more employment opportunities, expanding social intervention programmes and implementing sustainable economic empowerment initiatives.

It also recommended the establishment of designated trading areas and age-appropriate restrictions where necessary instead of imposing blanket penalties on vulnerable Nigerians trying to earn a living.

The Christian body appealed to President Tinubu, the National Assembly and the Federal Road Safety Corps to embark on wider consultations before the bill is signed into law.

It said the consultation process should include faith-based organisations, civil society organisations, transport unions, road safety experts, constitutional lawyers and representatives of vulnerable groups to ensure that the final legislation adequately balances public safety with fundamental human rights.

According to the CCN, Nigeria needs laws that are firm enough to protect lives on the highways but compassionate enough to avoid placing unbearable burdens on citizens already grappling with severe economic hardship.

The council maintained that legislation should promote national unity, protect fundamental freedoms and avoid creating perceptions of discrimination against any religious group.

The latest appeal comes amid growing public debate over the proposed amendment. While the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has endorsed the provision seeking to prohibit preaching in commercial buses, arguing that it would reduce driver distraction and help curb road accidents, several Christian organisations have urged the government to review the proposal to safeguard constitutionally guaranteed religious freedoms.

Legal analysts say the controversy surrounding the bill underscores the need for lawmakers to strike a careful balance between strengthening road safety regulations and protecting citizens’ fundamental rights as enshrined in the Constitution.

With the legislation now awaiting presidential assent, stakeholders across religious, legal and civil society circles are expected to intensify advocacy over the bill before a final decision is taken by the Presidency.

Christian Council opposes ₦50,000 fine for bus preaching, seeks Tinubu’s intervention

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

EFCC secures final forfeiture of 52 luxury Lekki homes in landmark court ruling

Published

on

EFCC secures final forfeiture of 52 luxury Lekki homes in landmark court ruling

EFCC secures final forfeiture of 52 luxury Lekki homes in landmark court ruling

A Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos, has ordered the permanent forfeiture of 52 terrace and maisonette housing units in the upscale Lekki area of Lagos State to the Federal Government, handing the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) one of its biggest asset recovery victories in recent years.

Justice Alexandra Owoeye delivered the landmark judgment on July 15, 2026, after granting an application filed by the Lagos Zonal Directorate 2 of the EFCC, which argued that the properties were reasonably suspected to have been acquired with proceeds of unlawful activities.

The forfeited properties are located at Mercyville Estate, Covenant Way, off New Road, Ilasan, Lekki, and were recovered from Fielddreams Limited, Ifeanyi Nweke and Amex Savings and Loans Limited, according to the anti-graft agency.

The ruling followed a lengthy legal process that began on August 14, 2024, when the EFCC secured an interim forfeiture order from Justice Akintayo Aluko after filing an ex parte application.

As required by law, the court directed the commission to publish the interim forfeiture order in a national newspaper, inviting anyone claiming ownership or interest in the properties to appear before the court and show cause why the estate should not be permanently forfeited to the Federal Government.

Following the publication, the respondents filed a counter-affidavit opposing the final forfeiture application. They initially claimed that the funds used to develop the estate were generated from the sale of part of a landed property and 29 terrace and maisonette housing units, which they valued at approximately ₦1.9 billion.

READ ALSO:

However, the respondents later changed their position by alleging that several of the housing units had not been completed. The EFCC argued that the new claim directly contradicted their earlier sworn affidavit, in which they maintained that proceeds from previous property sales were used to complete the furnishing and interior decoration of the remaining units and that construction of the estate had already been completed in 2020.

During the hearing, EFCC counsel Franklin Ofoma informed the court that the commission had fully complied with the publication order issued during the interim forfeiture proceedings. He said the application for final forfeiture was supported by a 31-paragraph affidavit deposed to by Afolabi Seyi Oladele, a litigation officer in the commission’s Legal Department.

The anti-graft agency maintained that its investigations established reasonable grounds to believe that the properties represented proceeds of unlawful activities, making them liable to forfeiture under Nigeria’s asset recovery laws.

The commission also informed the court that the second respondent, Ifeanyi Nweke, is a fugitive facing criminal prosecution. According to the EFCC, Nweke failed to appear before Justice R.A. Oshodi and Justice Okunuga in separate criminal proceedings despite being required to answer charges filed against him.

The EFCC further disclosed that two subsisting warrants of arrest had already been issued against Nweke after he allegedly jumped the administrative bail earlier granted to him by the commission.

In her judgment, Justice Owoeye held that the respondents’ affidavit contained material contradictions that undermined its credibility. She ruled that the court could not selectively rely on conflicting pieces of evidence presented by the respondents.

Consequently, the judge rejected the respondents’ affidavit in its entirety, holding that there was no credible opposition to the EFCC’s application for final forfeiture.

Justice Owoeye further ruled that the commission had successfully demonstrated reasonable grounds to suspect that the estate was acquired with proceeds of unlawful activities. She therefore granted the application and ordered that all 52 terrace and maisonette housing units be permanently forfeited to the Federal Government.

The judgment represents another significant milestone in the EFCC’s campaign against corruption, money laundering and financial crimes. In recent years, the commission has intensified the use of Nigeria’s non-conviction-based asset forfeiture framework to recover assets believed to have been acquired through illicit wealth, even where related criminal proceedings remain pending.

Legal analysts say the ruling reinforces the courts’ support for lawful asset recovery while underscoring the importance of presenting consistent and credible evidence in forfeiture proceedings.

With the judgment, ownership of the 52 housing units now officially vests in the Federal Government, which is expected to determine the future use of the properties in line with existing laws and national interest.

EFCC secures final forfeiture of 52 luxury Lekki homes in landmark court ruling

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

MURIC backs FRSC bill to ban preaching, hawking in commercial buses

Published

on

MURIC backs FRSC bill to ban preaching, hawking in commercial buses

MURIC backs FRSC bill to ban preaching, hawking in commercial buses

The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has thrown its weight behind a proposed Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) bill seeking to prohibit preaching and hawking inside commercial buses, describing the move as a necessary step to improve road safety and maintain public order.

In a statement issued on Saturday, the organisation’s Founder and Executive Director, Professor Ishaq Akintola, said the proposed legislation was “a step in the right direction” and praised the FRSC for what he described as a proactive initiative aimed at reducing distractions that could lead to road crashes.

According to MURIC, preaching inside commercial vehicles distracts drivers, increasing the risk of accidents, while also creating situations capable of causing public disturbance among passengers.

The group argued that bus preaching is inconsistent with global best practices, noting that similar activities are not permitted in commercial public transport systems in major cities such as London, Paris and Frankfurt.

READ ALSO:

Akintola said bus preachers frequently board intra-city, inter-city and interstate commercial buses, sometimes preaching throughout long-distance journeys, a practice he described as discourteous to passengers and potentially dangerous for road users.

He said MURIC’s support for the bill is based on two key considerations: the need to minimise driver distraction and the need to prevent conflicts that may arise from unsolicited religious activities in confined public spaces.

The Islamic rights organisation further stated that passengers often tolerate bus preaching despite finding it disruptive, adding that disagreements arising from such activities have, in some cases, led to altercations.

MURIC urged members of the National Assembly to expedite consideration of the proposed bill, citing Nigeria’s persistent road safety challenges.

The group referenced FRSC road crash statistics, which showed thousands of crashes, fatalities and injuries recorded across the country in recent years, arguing that measures capable of reducing distractions on the roads should receive legislative backing.

Akintola also observed that bus preaching is more commonly associated with Christian evangelists and called on Christian leaders and churches, particularly in the South-West, to discourage the practice among their members.

He maintained that preventing distractions capable of contributing to fatal road crashes should take precedence in efforts to improve road safety nationwide.

The proposed FRSC bill also seeks to prohibit hawking on highways and prescribes penalties for violations as part of broader efforts to enhance safety on Nigerian roads.

MURIC backs FRSC bill to ban preaching, hawking in commercial buses

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending