metro
Sacked CBN workers challenge their disengagement in court
Sacked CBN workers challenge their disengagement in court
Some officials of the Central Bank of Nigeria whose appointments were terminated in March this year under the leadership of the Governor, Yemi Cardoso, have dragged the apex bank to the National Industrial Court.
The ex-CBN officials, through their lawyers Isa Mohammed and Associates, are challenging the legality of their termination of appointment and demanding that the court reinstate them as their sacking was not done in line with the Human Resources Policies and Procedures Manual of the CBN.
Newstrends had in May this year reported that fourteen directors of the apex bank and over 300 other officials of the CBN were sacked by the bank.
The sacking brought the list of those so far disengaged from the bank under the CBN Governor, Olayemi Cardoso to over 500.
The mass sacking cuts across 29 departments, affecting all cadres from directors to deputy directors, assistant directors, principal managers, senior managers and lower-ranking staff like executive trainees.
Most of the members of staff affected were branch operations officials across the 36 branches in the 36 states of the federation and the headquarters in FCT.
Some of those who were earlier transferred from the headquarters to the branches were affected by the latest action, as they received their disengagement letters through emails.
A sample of the termination letter read, “In line with our new mission and vision, the Bank is currently undergoing a significant organizational and human capital restructuring process.
“As a result of this review, I have been directed to notify you that your services will not be required with effect from Friday, 24th May 2024. Your final entitlements will be calculated and paid to you in due course.”
But in the court affidavit dated October 21, 2024, which was obtained by THE WHISTLER, the workers claimed that they were unjustly sacked at a time when some of them had about seven years to their retirement date.
Part of the affidavit reads, “That it is the case of the claimants/applicants that the Unlawful termination of their appointment was not done for the alleged high-sounding phrase” on the grounds of reorganization and human capital restructuring.”
READ ALSO:
- Lagos teacher accused of sexually abusing student, aborting pregnancies
- We’re settling out of court with NNPC, others — Dangote
- EFCC re-arraigns ex-Kwara Governor Ahmed over N5.78bn fraud
“That the Claimants/Applicants state that the defendant/respondent has advertised the position of Directors skewed in such a way that all the Positions of Directors of the various Departments the Claimants/Applicants were heading as Directors, having late 2023 moved them to the FSS2020, a waiting point created by the Management of the Defendant/Respondent, for possible recruitment, even when the matter of unlawful termination of the Claimants/Applicant from the employ of the defendant/respondent is in Court and yet to be determined.
“That the claimants’/Applicants state that the letters issued to them on the 15th of March, 2024 by which the defendant/Respondent determined/terminated their employment was done contrary to the conditions of service.
“That the Claimants/Applicants state that their respective letters of employment specifically stated that their employment is subject to the conditions of service in force in the defendant/respondent from time to time. That the claimants/applicants state that payment in lieu of notice can only be paid to them on termination/determination of appointment after full.”
The Claimants/Applicants’ also stated through their counsel that they were discriminated against by the Defendant/Respondent, denied a fair hearing and were never queried for any act of misconduct by the Defendant before the determination of their respective appointments.
In the court document, the ex-CBN staff members also claimed that the action of the apex bank in advertising the vacancies of Directors, even when the matter is in Court, is an act of witch-hunt, which was done in bad faith and total disregard for its conditions of service and the Rule of Law.
Part of the court document reads, “The Claimants/Applicants’ states that the action of the Defendant/Respondent in advertising the vacancies of Directors, even when the matter is in Court, is an act of witch-hunt, which was done in bad faith and total disregard of its conditions of service and the Rule of Law.
“The Claimants/Applicants state that the Conditions of Service guarantee that in all cases of discipline, the relevant disciplinary Committee shall give a staff member against whom an allegation is made the opportunity to defend herself/himself.
“Sequel to the facts above, the Claimants/Applicants have initiated an action through their lawyers by way of a concurrent writ against the defendants seeking for reliefs as contained on the main suit.
“Unless the defendant is restrained by this Honorable court, it will destroy the subject matter of this suit and that will render the subject matter nugatory. Unless this application is granted, the claimants/Applicants will suffer further serious and grievous injustice.”
Sacked CBN workers challenge their disengagement in court
![]()
metro
Christian Council opposes ₦50,000 fine for bus preaching, seeks Tinubu’s intervention
Christian Council opposes ₦50,000 fine for bus preaching, seeks Tinubu’s intervention
The Christian Council of Nigeria (CCN) has called on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the National Assembly (NASS) to review contentious provisions of the proposed Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) Act (Amendment) Bill, 2026, warning that parts of the legislation could infringe on constitutional rights and impose additional hardship on struggling Nigerians.
The appeal follows the passage of the FRSC Amendment Bill, 2026 by the Senate, which proposes a ₦50,000 fine for anyone found hawking, trading or preaching in commercial buses, as well as stiffer penalties for several traffic-related offences. The bill is awaiting presidential assent before it can become law.
In a statement signed by its General Secretary, Rt. Rev. Evans Onyemara, the council said it fully supports efforts aimed at improving road safety and reducing accidents on Nigerian roads but insisted that such measures must respect the constitutional rights of citizens.
According to the CCN, the inclusion of preaching alongside hawking and trading among prohibited activities raises legitimate concerns over the constitutional rights to freedom of religion and freedom of expression guaranteed under the 1999 Constitution.
The council argued that while government has a responsibility to ensure road safety, legislation should not inadvertently criminalise peaceful religious activities carried out without disrupting drivers or passengers.
It noted that commercial buses have, for decades, served as platforms where Christians share brief messages of hope, repentance, encouragement and prayers with willing listeners, adding that any attempt to prohibit such activities deserves careful constitutional scrutiny.
According to the council, restricting peaceful evangelism without adequate consultation could create the perception that Christian religious expression is being unfairly targeted.
READ ALSO:
- EFCC secures final forfeiture of 52 luxury Lekki homes in landmark court ruling
- 2027 Gombe election: Pantami secures major boost as PDP aspirant withdraws court case
- MURIC backs FRSC bill to ban preaching, hawking in commercial buses
The CCN further expressed concern over the proposed ₦50,000 fine for hawkers, describing the penalty as harsh and insensitive to the prevailing economic realities facing millions of Nigerians.
It argued that many citizens engage in hawking and informal trading due to unemployment, poverty, inflation and the rising cost of living, stressing that poverty should not be criminalised through heavy financial penalties.
Rather than relying on punitive sanctions, the council urged the Federal Government to address the root causes of street trading by creating more employment opportunities, expanding social intervention programmes and implementing sustainable economic empowerment initiatives.
It also recommended the establishment of designated trading areas and age-appropriate restrictions where necessary instead of imposing blanket penalties on vulnerable Nigerians trying to earn a living.
The Christian body appealed to President Tinubu, the National Assembly and the Federal Road Safety Corps to embark on wider consultations before the bill is signed into law.
It said the consultation process should include faith-based organisations, civil society organisations, transport unions, road safety experts, constitutional lawyers and representatives of vulnerable groups to ensure that the final legislation adequately balances public safety with fundamental human rights.
According to the CCN, Nigeria needs laws that are firm enough to protect lives on the highways but compassionate enough to avoid placing unbearable burdens on citizens already grappling with severe economic hardship.
The council maintained that legislation should promote national unity, protect fundamental freedoms and avoid creating perceptions of discrimination against any religious group.
The latest appeal comes amid growing public debate over the proposed amendment. While the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has endorsed the provision seeking to prohibit preaching in commercial buses, arguing that it would reduce driver distraction and help curb road accidents, several Christian organisations have urged the government to review the proposal to safeguard constitutionally guaranteed religious freedoms.
Legal analysts say the controversy surrounding the bill underscores the need for lawmakers to strike a careful balance between strengthening road safety regulations and protecting citizens’ fundamental rights as enshrined in the Constitution.
With the legislation now awaiting presidential assent, stakeholders across religious, legal and civil society circles are expected to intensify advocacy over the bill before a final decision is taken by the Presidency.
Christian Council opposes ₦50,000 fine for bus preaching, seeks Tinubu’s intervention
![]()
metro
EFCC secures final forfeiture of 52 luxury Lekki homes in landmark court ruling
EFCC secures final forfeiture of 52 luxury Lekki homes in landmark court ruling
A Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos, has ordered the permanent forfeiture of 52 terrace and maisonette housing units in the upscale Lekki area of Lagos State to the Federal Government, handing the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) one of its biggest asset recovery victories in recent years.
Justice Alexandra Owoeye delivered the landmark judgment on July 15, 2026, after granting an application filed by the Lagos Zonal Directorate 2 of the EFCC, which argued that the properties were reasonably suspected to have been acquired with proceeds of unlawful activities.
The forfeited properties are located at Mercyville Estate, Covenant Way, off New Road, Ilasan, Lekki, and were recovered from Fielddreams Limited, Ifeanyi Nweke and Amex Savings and Loans Limited, according to the anti-graft agency.
The ruling followed a lengthy legal process that began on August 14, 2024, when the EFCC secured an interim forfeiture order from Justice Akintayo Aluko after filing an ex parte application.
As required by law, the court directed the commission to publish the interim forfeiture order in a national newspaper, inviting anyone claiming ownership or interest in the properties to appear before the court and show cause why the estate should not be permanently forfeited to the Federal Government.
Following the publication, the respondents filed a counter-affidavit opposing the final forfeiture application. They initially claimed that the funds used to develop the estate were generated from the sale of part of a landed property and 29 terrace and maisonette housing units, which they valued at approximately ₦1.9 billion.
READ ALSO:
- 2027 Gombe election: Pantami secures major boost as PDP aspirant withdraws court case
- MURIC backs FRSC bill to ban preaching, hawking in commercial buses
- Police Hunt Teacher Over Alleged Flogging to Death of 12-Year-Old Pupil in Anambra
However, the respondents later changed their position by alleging that several of the housing units had not been completed. The EFCC argued that the new claim directly contradicted their earlier sworn affidavit, in which they maintained that proceeds from previous property sales were used to complete the furnishing and interior decoration of the remaining units and that construction of the estate had already been completed in 2020.
During the hearing, EFCC counsel Franklin Ofoma informed the court that the commission had fully complied with the publication order issued during the interim forfeiture proceedings. He said the application for final forfeiture was supported by a 31-paragraph affidavit deposed to by Afolabi Seyi Oladele, a litigation officer in the commission’s Legal Department.
The anti-graft agency maintained that its investigations established reasonable grounds to believe that the properties represented proceeds of unlawful activities, making them liable to forfeiture under Nigeria’s asset recovery laws.
The commission also informed the court that the second respondent, Ifeanyi Nweke, is a fugitive facing criminal prosecution. According to the EFCC, Nweke failed to appear before Justice R.A. Oshodi and Justice Okunuga in separate criminal proceedings despite being required to answer charges filed against him.
The EFCC further disclosed that two subsisting warrants of arrest had already been issued against Nweke after he allegedly jumped the administrative bail earlier granted to him by the commission.
In her judgment, Justice Owoeye held that the respondents’ affidavit contained material contradictions that undermined its credibility. She ruled that the court could not selectively rely on conflicting pieces of evidence presented by the respondents.
Consequently, the judge rejected the respondents’ affidavit in its entirety, holding that there was no credible opposition to the EFCC’s application for final forfeiture.
Justice Owoeye further ruled that the commission had successfully demonstrated reasonable grounds to suspect that the estate was acquired with proceeds of unlawful activities. She therefore granted the application and ordered that all 52 terrace and maisonette housing units be permanently forfeited to the Federal Government.
The judgment represents another significant milestone in the EFCC’s campaign against corruption, money laundering and financial crimes. In recent years, the commission has intensified the use of Nigeria’s non-conviction-based asset forfeiture framework to recover assets believed to have been acquired through illicit wealth, even where related criminal proceedings remain pending.
Legal analysts say the ruling reinforces the courts’ support for lawful asset recovery while underscoring the importance of presenting consistent and credible evidence in forfeiture proceedings.
With the judgment, ownership of the 52 housing units now officially vests in the Federal Government, which is expected to determine the future use of the properties in line with existing laws and national interest.
EFCC secures final forfeiture of 52 luxury Lekki homes in landmark court ruling
![]()
metro
MURIC backs FRSC bill to ban preaching, hawking in commercial buses
MURIC backs FRSC bill to ban preaching, hawking in commercial buses
The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has thrown its weight behind a proposed Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) bill seeking to prohibit preaching and hawking inside commercial buses, describing the move as a necessary step to improve road safety and maintain public order.
In a statement issued on Saturday, the organisation’s Founder and Executive Director, Professor Ishaq Akintola, said the proposed legislation was “a step in the right direction” and praised the FRSC for what he described as a proactive initiative aimed at reducing distractions that could lead to road crashes.
According to MURIC, preaching inside commercial vehicles distracts drivers, increasing the risk of accidents, while also creating situations capable of causing public disturbance among passengers.
The group argued that bus preaching is inconsistent with global best practices, noting that similar activities are not permitted in commercial public transport systems in major cities such as London, Paris and Frankfurt.
READ ALSO:
- Police Hunt Teacher Over Alleged Flogging to Death of 12-Year-Old Pupil in Anambra
- My Period Saved Me: Oyo Woman Escapes Rape by Armed Bororo Fulani Attackers
- Case for replicating the Oyo kidnap-rescue template nationwide, By Farooq Kperogi
Akintola said bus preachers frequently board intra-city, inter-city and interstate commercial buses, sometimes preaching throughout long-distance journeys, a practice he described as discourteous to passengers and potentially dangerous for road users.
He said MURIC’s support for the bill is based on two key considerations: the need to minimise driver distraction and the need to prevent conflicts that may arise from unsolicited religious activities in confined public spaces.
The Islamic rights organisation further stated that passengers often tolerate bus preaching despite finding it disruptive, adding that disagreements arising from such activities have, in some cases, led to altercations.
MURIC urged members of the National Assembly to expedite consideration of the proposed bill, citing Nigeria’s persistent road safety challenges.
The group referenced FRSC road crash statistics, which showed thousands of crashes, fatalities and injuries recorded across the country in recent years, arguing that measures capable of reducing distractions on the roads should receive legislative backing.
Akintola also observed that bus preaching is more commonly associated with Christian evangelists and called on Christian leaders and churches, particularly in the South-West, to discourage the practice among their members.
He maintained that preventing distractions capable of contributing to fatal road crashes should take precedence in efforts to improve road safety nationwide.
The proposed FRSC bill also seeks to prohibit hawking on highways and prescribes penalties for violations as part of broader efforts to enhance safety on Nigerian roads.
MURIC backs FRSC bill to ban preaching, hawking in commercial buses
![]()
-
metro1 day agoFG Arraigns Three Suspects Over Abduction of Oyo Schoolchildren, Teachers
-
metro3 days agoMary Habila: NYCN gives David Umahi seven days to resign, threatens nationwide protest
-
News1 day agoJust in: Supreme Court Orders Final Forfeiture of Emefiele’s Assets, Ends Legal Battle
-
News2 days agoSenate passes Bill proposing N50,000 fine for preaching, hawking in commercial buses
-
metro2 days agoCAC Commences Deregistration of 100,000 Companies Over Unfiled Annual Returns
-
News2 days agoAppeal Court Restores INEC Guidelines, Paves Way for 2027 General Elections
-
metro2 days agoBREAKING: “I’ve Never Met Him”: Gbajabiamila Files ₦15bn Defamation Suit Against PFIPC DG
-
News3 days agoSanwo-Olu Tours Flood-hit Lagos Communities, Orders Urgent Drainage Works, Long-term Fixes
