South African Consulate Denies Visa Restrictions on Nigerians

Consul General confirms visa services continue as normal and introduces new digital travel system

The South African Consulate in Lagos has officially debunked reports that it has stopped issuing visas to Nigerians due to ongoing anti-migrant protests in South Africa. Consul General of South Africa, Prof. Bobby Moroe, made the clarification during a round-table organised by the Nigerian Institute of International Affairs (NIIA) themed “South Africa’s Xenophobia in Comparative Perspective”. He assured that no Nigerian applicant who qualifies for a visa will be denied entry into the country, offering a firm rebuttal to widespread speculation that visa services had been suspended amid rising tensions.

Speaking at the event, Prof. Moroe emphasised that visa issuance remains ongoing despite heightened concerns over xenophobic tensions in parts of South Africa. He stated, “Visas continue to be issued in spite of the ongoing protests and Nigerians are still visiting the country for tourism and other legitimate purposes. We wish to make it clear again that Nigerians under these circumstances faced today will never be discriminated against. No basis will justify why your visa is rejected except that you, for one reason or another may not have qualified with the requirements of the visa.” The Consul General stressed that visa applications would be considered on their individual merits and in accordance with established immigration requirements, drawing a clear distinction between domestic protests and South Africa’s official visa policy, which remains unchanged and non-discriminatory toward Nigerian nationals.

READ ALSO:

• Electric Vehicles: Six-point blueprint to drive mass adoption, by Metropolitan CEO 
• New Mercedes-Benz Atego’s technology, performance raise benchmark in Nigeria’s truck business
• Fuel subsidy: FG records N20.4tn extra resources, spends N30.6tn, says Oyedele

Prof. Moroe also announced the recent introduction of South Africa’s Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA), describing it as a digital system designed to simplify and accelerate travel authorisation for prospective visitors. The new system reduces documentation requirements and replaces aspects of the traditional visa application process, allowing travellers to apply through their mobile devices, which makes the process faster, safer and more convenient. However, it is important to note that Nigeria is not currently among the four countries covered by the initial ETA rollout, as the system remains a future expansion priority for South Africa, meaning Nigerian travellers will still follow the existing visa application procedure for now.

The reassurance comes amid data showing that visa applications from Nigerians have nearly doubled in recent months, reflecting sustained interest in travel to South Africa for business, tourism and education. Despite persistent safety concerns and the repatriation of over 1,400 Nigerians affected by previous xenophobic violence, Prof. Moroe insisted that “South Africa is open for business, South Africa is open for tourism, and South Africa is open for any other form of visit,” signalling that the country remains welcoming to legitimate travellers from Nigeria.

South African missions in Nigeria have confirmed that their visa sections in Lagos and Abuja remain accessible and are actively receiving applications. Key requirements for Nigerian applicants include a completed visa application form with two passport-size photographs, a valid Nigerian passport that must be valid for at least 30 days beyond your return date, and a Yellow Fever vaccination certificate, which is mandatory for travellers from Nigeria and is the most commonly mishandled requirement—it must be presented as the original International Certificate of Vaccination or Prophylaxis (ICVP), not a photocopy or photo. Applicants are also required to provide bank statements showing six months of financial history, along with proof of accommodation and return flight booking. Processing takes a minimum of 15 working days, so early application is strongly advised. The Consul General urged Nigerian travellers to familiarise themselves with South African laws, understand their rights, and know the locations of law enforcement agencies in case of emergencies, ensuring they are well-prepared for their stay.

The clarification comes against the backdrop of persistent xenophobic tensions in South Africa, where foreign nationals have periodically faced protests, hostility and attacks over claims surrounding unemployment and economic competition. Nigerians have been among the foreign nationals affected by previous episodes of xenophobic violence, making reports of any possible restriction on their entry into South Africa particularly sensitive. The Consul-General’s intervention aims to reassure the Nigerian public that no blanket restrictions have been imposed and that eligible travellers will continue to be granted travel authorisation, reinforcing the message that diplomatic ties remain strong and that South Africa values its relationship with Nigeria.

South African Consulate Denies Visa Restrictions on Nigerians

LAWMA, Police Move to Crack Down on Illegal Waste Dumping in Lagos

The Lagos State Government is stepping up efforts to tackle indiscriminate waste dumping and illegal activities at dumpsites, with the Lagos Waste Management Authority and the state Police Command agreeing to strengthen enforcement and security measures across the state.

The two agencies also agreed to improve the protection of waste management facilities and personnel following concerns over attacks and resistance faced by some LAWMA officials while carrying out their duties.

The Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer of LAWMA, Dr Muyiwa Gbadegesin, made the call on Tuesday during a courtesy visit to the Lagos State Commissioner of Police, CP Tijani Fatai, at the Lagos State Police Command, GRA, Ikeja.

A statement signed by the Director, Public Affairs, LAWMA, Mukaila Sanusi, said Gbadegesin sought stronger police support for the authority’s enforcement and operational activities.

Gbadegesin said Lagos’ rapidly growing population had continued to put pressure on its waste management infrastructure, with the state generating between 13,000 and 16,000 tonnes of waste daily.

He said the huge volume required sustained waste collection, infrastructure development, recycling and resource recovery, alongside effective enforcement and inter-agency cooperation.

The LAWMA boss also raised concerns over the safety of enforcement officers, street sweepers and other personnel deployed to evacuate indiscriminately dumped waste.

According to him, some officials had encountered resistance and attacks from unauthorised persons, including armed scavengers, while performing their statutory duties.

He therefore called for enhanced security around critical LAWMA facilities, operational locations and areas identified as prone to illegal activities.

“We are committed to working closely with the Police and other relevant security agencies to restore order around waste management facilities, protect our personnel and infrastructure, and ensure that anyone who assaults or obstructs our officers while performing their lawful duties is made to face the consequences of such actions,” he said.

Responding, Fatai acknowledged LAWMA’s role in maintaining a clean, healthy and sustainable environment in Lagos, commending the authority for its efforts to improve waste management and environmental sanitation.

The police commissioner said indiscriminate dumping and other environmental violations continued to undermine gains recorded in waste management, stressing the need for stronger enforcement, public awareness and responsible behaviour by residents.

Fatai assured LAWMA of the command’s full support in tackling illegal dumping, unauthorised occupation and encroachment of dumpsites, as well as attacks on LAWMA personnel.

He said the police would work with the authority to ensure that environmental offenders faced the consequences of their actions while supporting efforts to protect LAWMA’s facilities, personnel and operational assets.

The meeting reaffirmed the commitment of both agencies to sustained collaboration and stronger enforcement as part of efforts to achieve a cleaner, safer and more sustainable Lagos.

US Court Grants Four-Day Extension for Release of Tinubu Drug-Trafficking Records

A United States federal prosecutor appointed by President Donald Trump has begun moves to comply with a court order compelling the release of records held by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) , Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) , and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) concerning historical drug-trafficking allegations involving Nigerian President Bola Ahmed Tinubu . US Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro requested an additional 10 days to comply with the court’s directive, but US District Judge Beryl Howell granted only a four-day extension, setting August 21, 2026 as the deadline for compliance, noting that the case had already been pending for more than three years.

President Tinubu has formally joined the Department of Justice’s request for additional time in the long-running Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit. According to a filing obtained by Von Batten-Montague-York, a Washington-based policy advisory and lobbying firm retained by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, Tinubu’s legal team submitted a notice of joinder to ensure his response remained on the same schedule as the defendants’. The filing, titled “Notice of Joinder,” was submitted before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in Aaron Greenspan v. Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, et al., and identifies Tinubu as “Intervenor Bola Ahmed Tinubu”. The filing was signed by Christopher W. Carmichael of Henderson Parks LLC, but the court rejected the full extension request, maintaining the August 21 deadline. According to the lobbying firm’s clarification of the court’s timetable, the DOJ must by that date tell Judge Howell its position on the demand for the release of the records, while Tinubu also has until August 21 to formally object to their disclosure.

READ ALSO:

• Osun Poll: Fayose Says Federal Might Could Have Swayed Result If Deployed
• NAICOM revokes Universal Insurance licence over ₦15bn capital shortfall
• US indicts 17 Iranians over $20m cyber-theft campaign targeting 322 global institutions

The case was brought by American transparency activist Aaron Greenspan, who filed FOIA requests seeking records from US law enforcement agencies relating to investigations involving Tinubu. The records concern a US federal investigation into a Chicago-based heroin-trafficking network that operated between 1988 and 1991, with US authorities investigating individuals including Adegboyega Mueez Akande and Abiodun Agbele in connection with the network. According to previously released US court records, the investigation examined funds deposited into several US bank accounts reportedly opened or controlled by Tinubu, and in January 1992, US authorities obtained a court order freezing accounts containing more than $1.4 million** allegedly connected to Tinubu. On **October 4, 1993**, the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ordered the forfeiture of **$460,000 held in an account at First Heritage Bank in Tinubu’s name to the US government, with the court order stating that the funds constituted proceeds of narcotics trafficking or were involved in financial transactions prohibited under US federal law.

Von Batten-Montague-York, which has been campaigning for the release of the documents, welcomed the development and commended Pirro and the Justice Department for taking steps towards complying with the court’s directive. The firm has argued that US strategic interests with Nigeria should not prevent the release of the records, stating, “As President Trump has indicated, our shared interests with Nigeria do not mean supporting an alleged drug trafficker.” The firm has also alleged that the DOJ under former President Joe Biden fought the release of the FOIA records, while asserting that the DOJ under President Trump would not protect an alleged drug trafficker linked to heroin smuggling from Nigeria through Illinois to Indiana. In July 2026, Von Batten-Montague-York disclosed that it had begun distributing more than 60 pages of DOJ documents and related court materials concerning Tinubu’s 1993 civil forfeiture case to officials in the Trump administration and members of Congress.

President Tinubu has consistently denied wrongdoing and rejected allegations linking him to drug trafficking. His lawyers have maintained that the 1993 proceeding was an in rem civil forfeiture case brought against the money rather than a criminal prosecution against Tinubu personally, and they have emphasised that Tinubu was never arrested, indicted, arraigned, or criminally convicted of a drug-trafficking offence in the United States. The All Progressives Congress (APC) has previously informed the Presidential Election Petition Court that the decision was not against Tinubu but against funds in accounts opened in his name, and that the compromise terms that led to the forfeiture were preceded by express admission that Tinubu did not admit the commission of any drug-related conduct. In April 2025, following Howell’s ruling, presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga said the court order did not amount to an indictment of Tinubu and that the records related to an old matter, with the distinction between the civil forfeiture and a criminal conviction remaining central to Tinubu’s defence whenever the issue resurfaces.

The development comes as Nigeria approaches the 2027 general elections, in which Tinubu is expected to seek re-election. The issue previously resurfaced during legal challenges to Tinubu’s victory in Nigeria’s 2023 presidential election, when Atiku Abubakar and Labour Party candidate Peter Obi argued that the forfeiture should have affected Tinubu’s eligibility, but Nigeria’s Presidential Election Petition Court dismissed the challenges and affirmed Tinubu’s election. The court’s deadline of August 21, 2026, for compliance with the records disclosure order suggests that the legal proceedings are fast-tracking towards a resolution, though the exact scope and content of the materials to be released remain unclear. Unless Judge Howell requests further information or arguments, the court is expected to regard the arguments as complete after September 18 and proceed to a ruling.

US Court Grants Four-Day Extension for Release of Tinubu Drug-Trafficking Records