WAEC Assures Hitch-Free 2026 WASSCE as NASU Protest Enters Day Two

The West African Examinations Council (WAEC) has reassured candidates, parents, school owners, and other stakeholders that the ongoing 2026 West African Senior School Certificate Examination (WASSCE) will continue smoothly despite the ongoing nationwide protest by members of the Non-Academic Staff Union of Educational and Associated Institutions (NASU).

The assurance came amid growing concerns over a three-day industrial action embarked upon by NASU members across WAEC offices nationwide over allegations of management high-handedness, illegal recruitment practices, welfare concerns, and controversial pay policies.

The protest, which began on Wednesday at WAEC’s national headquarters in Yaba, Lagos, reportedly spread to several regional and state offices across the country, raising fears about possible disruptions to the ongoing examinations.

However, WAEC, in a statement signed by the Acting Head of Public Affairs for the Head of National Office, Moyosola F. Adesina, said the Council had already activated contingency plans to ensure that the 2026 WASSCE proceeds without interruption.

According to the examination body, discussions are currently ongoing with the aggrieved workers to address the issues raised by the union.

“While we are concerned about the rights of unions and staff to express their grievances, we are also committed to ensuring seamless and smooth conduct of the ongoing examination,” the statement read.

WAEC explained that some of the issues raised by NASU had either been misunderstood or misrepresented.

READ ALSO:

• Edo Varsity Suspends 27 Medical Students Over Exam Fraud
• Police Fire Tear Gas as Osun Students Protest Colleague’s Death
• CBN Data Shows Naira Strengthening Across Forex Markets

The Council clarified that the recent adjustment in examination days was a direct consequence of the streamlining of WAEC subjects from 76 to 38, as well as the adoption of a hybrid mode of examination conduct.

It also dismissed allegations of arbitrary dismissals and punitive sanctions against workers, insisting that all disciplinary and career progression matters are handled strictly in line with the provisions of the WAEC Staff Handbook and relevant statutory regulations.

On the controversial recruitment of contract staff, WAEC said the engagement of contract Examination Officers and Assistant Examination Officers was introduced to help manage increasing workloads and improve operational efficiency across the sub-region.

“The engagement of contract staff is a strategic operational measure aimed at enhancing efficiency and ensuring the seamless conduct of the Council’s processes,” WAEC stated.

The Council further urged members of the public to disregard rumours and misinformation capable of creating panic among candidates and parents.

WAEC assured Nigerians that the integrity, credibility, and smooth conduct of the examination remain its top priority.

The Council also reaffirmed its long-standing commitment to delivering reliable educational assessments to students across Nigeria and other member countries, noting that it has sustained that mandate for over 74 years.

Meanwhile, NASU insisted that the protest would continue following the expiration of a seven-day ultimatum issued to WAEC management.

In a letter signed by NASU General Secretary, Peters Adeyemi, the union accused the management of unilateral decision-making, breach of seniority principles, suspension of staff upgrade programmes, and imposition of a minimum net pay policy without proper consultation.

The union also faulted the constitution of investigative panels without union involvement and expressed concerns over recent changes to the structure of the WASSCE examination.

NASU disclosed that its branches nationwide unanimously agreed during an online meeting to proceed with the industrial action after negotiations with management allegedly failed to produce satisfactory outcomes.

The union warned that the protest could be escalated if the management fails to address its demands.

Despite the labour dispute, WAEC maintained that the ongoing 2026 WASSCE remains stable and uninterrupted nationwide.

The Council disclosed that nearly two million candidates from more than 24,000 secondary schools are currently participating in the examination across Nigeria.

WAEC Assures Hitch-Free 2026 WASSCE as NASU Protest Enters Day Two

NUT Rejects UTME Waiver for NCE Admission

The Nigeria Union of Teachers (NUT) has rejected the Federal Government’s decision to exempt candidates seeking admission into the Nigeria Certificate in Education (NCE) programme from writing the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME), warning that the policy could significantly undermine the quality of teacher education in Nigeria.

The position was expressed by the NUT National President, Audu Titus Amba, during a teacher sensitisation programme organised by 21st Century in collaboration with the Teachers Registration Council of Nigeria (TRCN) in Abuja.

Amba said the policy reflects a worrying trend where Colleges of Education in Nigeria are increasingly becoming a second-choice destination for candidates who fail to secure admission into universities, rather than attracting top-performing students into the teaching profession.

According to him, teaching should be reserved for some of the most academically strong candidates, stressing that lowering entry standards could have long-term consequences on the country’s basic education system.

“Why can’t we now say that anyone going to the College of Education to become a teacher tomorrow must be among the highest-scoring candidates in UTME?

READ ALSO:

• JUST IN: Kano APC Crisis Ends as Gwarzo Withdraws Senate Bid, Backs Barau Jibrin
• Zamfara Airstrike: 72 Feared Dead as Military, Amnesty Disagree on Death Toll
• How Suspected Kidnappers Lured UNIJOS Graduate With Job Offer

“Colleges of Education are supposed to have the best candidates, but unfortunately, when people fail to secure university admission, they are told to go and manage NCE,” he said.

The controversy follows the Federal Government’s recent policy announcement at the JAMB policy meeting, where the Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, stated that applicants with at least four credit passes in relevant subjects would no longer be required to sit for UTME before gaining admission into Colleges of Education.

Government officials argue that the reform is aimed at expanding access to teacher training programmes in Nigeria, reducing admission pressure on universities, and addressing the shortage of qualified teachers nationwide.

However, the NUT insists that while access to education is important, maintaining high academic and professional standards in teacher preparation must remain a priority.

Amba warned that weakening admission requirements could result in producing underqualified teachers, which may ultimately affect the quality of learning outcomes in primary and secondary schools across the country.

At the same event, stakeholders including the Teachers Registration Council of Nigeria (TRCN) highlighted the need for continuous professional development to prepare teachers for a rapidly evolving education system driven by technology and digital learning.

TRCN Registrar, Dr. Ronke Soyombo, stressed that modern teachers must be digitally competent, innovative, and professionally trained to meet global standards in education delivery.

She noted that teacher training must go beyond certification to include continuous capacity building, particularly in digital literacy in education.

The Minister of Education, represented by Dr. Iyabo Ali, also reaffirmed the government’s commitment to improving teacher quality through ongoing reforms and training initiatives aimed at strengthening Nigeria’s education sector.

Other speakers at the programme, including Speaker of the House of Representatives Tajudeen Abbas (represented by Dr. Mary Aba) and Senate Minority Leader Senator Abba Moro, called for stronger collaboration among education stakeholders to improve standards and learning conditions.

Senator Moro expressed concern over the deteriorating state of public education, warning that many schools in Nigeria still lack adequate infrastructure and conducive learning environments for effective teaching and learning.

Education analysts say the debate reflects a long-standing tension in Nigeria’s education policy between expanding access to teacher training and maintaining strict academic standards in education reform in Nigeria.

While the Federal Government maintains that the UTME waiver is designed to encourage more candidates into the teaching profession and address staffing shortages, critics like the NUT insist that quality must not be compromised.

NUT Rejects UTME Waiver for NCE Admission

Trump Expands Efforts to Revoke Citizenship of Some Foreign-Born Americans

The administration of United States President Donald Trump has intensified efforts to strip citizenship from some naturalised Americans, launching fresh denaturalisation cases against individuals accused of fraud, terrorism-related activities, war crimes and other serious offences.

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) confirmed that new proceedings have been filed against about a dozen foreign-born US citizens accused of concealing critical information during their immigration and naturalisation processes or engaging in criminal activities that could have disqualified them from obtaining citizenship.

Among the most prominent cases is that of Debashis Ghosh, an Indian-origin businessman accused of orchestrating an investment fraud scheme valued at approximately $2.5 million.

According to court filings, Ghosh allegedly defrauded investors both before and after obtaining US citizenship by misleading them about the management and location of investment funds.

Federal authorities alleged that he intentionally concealed aspects of the scheme during his naturalisation process and continued the fraudulent operation after becoming a US citizen.

The latest actions are part of a broader immigration enforcement strategy by the Trump administration, which has increasingly focused on denaturalisation as a tool for addressing alleged immigration fraud and national security concerns.

US officials said the new cases were filed through collaboration between the Department of Justice’s Office of Immigration Litigation, the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and federal prosecutors across multiple states.

Authorities stated that some of the individuals targeted in the latest crackdown are accused of terrorism-related offences, firearms trafficking, financial crimes and even war crimes.

Under US law, denaturalisation is the legal process through which citizenship obtained through naturalisation can be revoked if the government proves that the person intentionally concealed material facts or committed fraud during the citizenship process.

READ ALSO:

• Israel Jails Soldiers Over Virgin Mary Statue Desecration in Lebanon
• Frank Edoho Breaks Silence on Collapse of Second Marriage
• Repentant Terrorists Swear Quran Oath Before Reintegration — Borno Govt

Legal experts note that denaturalisation remains relatively uncommon because US citizenship enjoys strong constitutional protections.

However, federal courts may revoke citizenship in cases involving deliberate deception, false identity claims, undisclosed criminal conduct or affiliations with terrorist or extremist organisations.

Statistics released by immigration authorities show that between 1990 and 2017, the United States filed slightly more than 300 denaturalisation cases — averaging about 11 cases annually — making the recent increase under the Trump administration particularly significant.

The renewed push follows years of stricter immigration policies introduced during Trump’s presidency, including expanded vetting procedures, tougher asylum policies and intensified reviews of old immigration records for possible fraud.

The Department of Justice has previously argued that citizenship obtained through deception undermines the integrity of the US immigration system and should be revoked when evidence supports such action.

Critics, however, warn that aggressive denaturalisation efforts could create widespread anxiety among immigrant communities and naturalised citizens who fear increased government scrutiny.

Civil liberties organisations and immigration advocacy groups have repeatedly argued that expanding citizenship revocation policies risks undermining confidence in the immigration system and may discourage eligible immigrants from applying for US citizenship.

Legal scholars have also raised concerns that broad denaturalisation campaigns could disproportionately affect minority and immigrant populations, particularly individuals from developing countries.

Although the current list of defendants does not specifically target any nationality, the inclusion of an Indian-origin businessman has attracted significant attention within South Asian communities in the United States.

Many immigrant advocacy groups believe the development signals a broader immigration enforcement approach rather than a nationality-specific crackdown.

Immigration lawyers also noted that denaturalisation cases can have severe consequences beyond the loss of citizenship, including possible criminal prosecution, detention and eventual deportation if courts rule against the accused individuals.

The Justice Department has not disclosed how many of the ongoing cases could ultimately lead to deportation proceedings or additional criminal charges.

Meanwhile, supporters of the administration’s immigration policies argue that enforcing denaturalisation laws is necessary to preserve the credibility of the US citizenship process and ensure that citizenship is not granted through fraud or deception.

The renewed enforcement push is expected to further fuel political debate over immigration, citizenship rights and national security as the United States moves deeper into another heated election season.

Trump Expands Efforts to Revoke Citizenship of Some Foreign-Born Americans